Elberik said:You believe in Valve and think that I am wrong because I don't believe in Valve.lacktheknack said:OK, then. What does MY post boil down to?Elberik said:The potential of the Steam Machine is intriguing. Right out the gate I see little to nothing that makes it any better than what already exists. I'm not ignoring what people are saying, but no one has disproved my OP. Most of them boil down to "I believe in Valve."lacktheknack said:People have told you why you're wrong over and over and over and over and over and it's like talking to someone in R&P.
A prebuilt Steam Machine holds a ton of value to any console gamers wishing to take a stepping stone to PC gaming, as well as potentially the entire hardware-modder community. The OS holds immense value to Microsoft-haters, as it indicates a step into Linux that wouldn't otherwise be taken if the Steam Machine was not released.
Just because it doesn't fill a void doesn't mean it doesn't do some things better. The upcoming consoles don't "fill a void" either, as they have predecessors.
If you're going to reply with "But it doesn't hold any value to the general public!" and ignore everything I just said, please don't bother. I won't.
Analyze carefully.
That's not what I said AT ALL.
Go re-read the post and show me where I said "It's good because Valve did it". Maybe you'll notice that I've not even SAID the word "Valve".
SHOW ME.
This is a Chewbacca defense at its finest worst.