I can't speak for the politics of the writers of Bloodlines, though since the sequel has the same writing team we can safely assume that they are pretty progressive today. More pertinently, my first paragraph was a hypothetical example of how a storyline can be written with two different focuses, the second paragraph was a discussion on the actual Voerman plotline in the first game. That's besides the point that someone who uses a highly masculine tone can still deliver a solid point (see Conan the Barbarian, Starship Troopers for examples) or write a good plotline, but that a hypermasculine tone might not be right for a setting like the WoD.Dreiko said:I think you're kinda contradicting yourself. Was the game prior this sort of "masculine" thing or was it well written by someone who understood how to treat sexual abuse stories without them actually being a feminist or what have you? If it was the latter, do you even gain anything by changing this up outside of ticking more boxes? It sounds to me the masculine fantasy handled things just right and it also gave you more options to play around with if you were so inclined.
Would it be better to remove some options or what? What's the issue with it?
I don't disagree with you. My point all along was that Here Comes Tomorrow is worried about the writers including the ability to choose the pronoun used to address the PC because he fears it is a sign that the writers will not be able to portray the gothic horror of WoD in a proper fashion because they will be too busy not offending anyone. I think it is an unfounded fear, based more on identity politics then the actual writing chops of the writing team. And what you just wrote here is pretty much my point, that just because you're a social progressive that doesn't mean you lack the ability to write engaging stories about dark content.Dreiko said:I'm always gonna be skeptical of "person of group X is by definition more topical" claims. In the end you just want a good story and if the good story is written by someone who isn't who you'd expect to write it that's an even greater accomplishment to rejoice over, not something to bemoaningly accept. If the story isn't good then similarly it wasn't good and it's not some type of failure at being this group of person that was the cause, the writer was just bad. I wouldn't absolve someone of the responsibility of their actions with the excuse of "of course you couldn't write this story, you aren't X".