In the wee hours of the morning, when my body is awake and my brain clearly disagrees with the concept, I occasionally have small bursts of incredible paranoia. Not nearly enough that I begin to distrust anything that actually matters, but more of just, "what if ____ company was trying to pull a fast one on us?" And not in the stereotypical "EA = jerks" kind of fashion, more along the lines of something that could make sense if your brain squints hard enough, but is most certainly not true. Case in point:
What if Half-Life 2E3/Half-Life 3 is actually finished, or has been finished for some time, and Valve is merely trying to think of another bundle package for it? The most recent installment came in the Orange Box, complete with Team Fortress 2 and Portal, two smash hits. What if to make up for the time between installments, Valve is just tying to draft up new titles to lump with the long-since completed Half-Life title?
Or:
What if there is no Zelda timeline? And I don't mean in the "what if Nintendo had never planned for a timeline until much later," which I agree with, but that the games can be explained without use of a timeline. Perhaps Nintendo will eventually reveal that it all makes sense in a more simplified sort of way, like the Mistelling Theory, where each Zelda game is the same tale told by a different person, which is why the subtler details tend to differ. Sometimes you have a horse, sometimes it's a boat, sometimes you're even a wolf, but at the end of the day, Link beats Ganon with Master Sword and Boomerang to rescue some blonde lady.
So, lovely Escapist community, do you have any odd theories like these?
What if Half-Life 2E3/Half-Life 3 is actually finished, or has been finished for some time, and Valve is merely trying to think of another bundle package for it? The most recent installment came in the Orange Box, complete with Team Fortress 2 and Portal, two smash hits. What if to make up for the time between installments, Valve is just tying to draft up new titles to lump with the long-since completed Half-Life title?
Or:
What if there is no Zelda timeline? And I don't mean in the "what if Nintendo had never planned for a timeline until much later," which I agree with, but that the games can be explained without use of a timeline. Perhaps Nintendo will eventually reveal that it all makes sense in a more simplified sort of way, like the Mistelling Theory, where each Zelda game is the same tale told by a different person, which is why the subtler details tend to differ. Sometimes you have a horse, sometimes it's a boat, sometimes you're even a wolf, but at the end of the day, Link beats Ganon with Master Sword and Boomerang to rescue some blonde lady.
So, lovely Escapist community, do you have any odd theories like these?