views about sexual assault on men

[Dudemeister]

You can't rape the willing.
Most men are willing.

Therefore, you can't rape men.

This guy ^

 

[Toners]

I'm currently trying to find a source that says something I heard recently:
"It's rape if done by a man, but sexual assault if done by a woman".
I'm getting pretty close. I'll post it when I get it.
EDIT: AHA! Women can officially rape men:
http://www.fathermag.com/news/rape/spokane.shtml
A woman was accused of first-degree rape and sexual assault. Nice.

 

[ThrobbingEgo]

Are you a dude? If so, you might of realised you don't think "Man, I'm gunna get a boner", then you get one, it just happens, the slightest gust of wind can bring it about.

Oh man, did you see that gust of wind? Daaaaaaaamn.

 

[superbleeder12]

I'm currently trying to find a source that says something I heard recently:
"It's rape if done by a man, but sexual assault if done by a woman".
I'm getting pretty close. I'll post it when I get it.
EDIT: AHA! Women can officially rape men:
http://www.fathermag.com/news/rape/spokane.shtml
A woman was accused of first-degree rape and sexual assault. Nice.

that website has a subdirectory for rape.... wat?

I'm not too sure how rape would work with a guy, seeing as an erection/orgasm is partially a mental thing.

 

[Manji187]

I don't know... male rape sounds to me like a contradictio in terminis. Unless of course we are talking jail and picking-up-the-soap kind of situation. But a woman raping a man... it sounds so...surreal.

 

[Toners]

I'm currently trying to find a source that says something I heard recently:
"It's rape if done by a man, but sexual assault if done by a woman".
I'm getting pretty close. I'll post it when I get it.
EDIT: AHA! Women can officially rape men:
http://www.fathermag.com/news/rape/spokane.shtml
A woman was accused of first-degree rape and sexual assault. Nice.

that website has a subdirectory for rape.... wat?

I'm not too sure how rape would work with a guy, seeing as an erection/orgasm is partially a mental thing.

read the rest of the thread as to how it would work aaaand:

I don't know... male rape sounds to me like a contradictio in terminis. Unless of course we are talking jail and picking-up-the-soap kind of situation. But a woman raping a man... it sounds so...surreal.

Turns out women have a sex drive too, it's not just men and what's more, some women have a domination fetish. Bearing in mind VERY scary women a lot of the time Sometimes, this domination fetish can lead into a massive sexual desire with a complete stranger. As such they'll do whatever they can to get the guy they want...
It's weird, but it does happen. Trust me, some girls out there are FREAKS

 

[AnGeL.SLayer]

*scraches head* I just dont see how male rape can be compaired to female. I understand the biology here. But to some extent men have to be willing, you have to be turnd on some way or another and if your in a real rape situation then you arent going to be turnd on. Let me point out that when you say 'rape' to me I picture fighting with people getting hurt, maybe broken bones. I would not just let someone easily rape me, if I were aware of what is going on anyway. Their would be blood, mine or his. Short of being tied down, it would not be an easy experience. I guess theres a few levels of rape that I just dont seem to understand. If a man was being assulted by a woman intent with rape, could all you guys honestly say you could still get a hard on? and not only that, could she be able to over power you? I get that most 'rape' cases are of teenage boys with older women. I just dont understand I guess.


^_^

 

[Andalusa]

Anyone can be raped, even guys.
Yes, it's very different to a girl being raped, but it does happen.

 

[CuddlyCombine]

I don't see how sexual assault on men is different from sexual assault on women. I mean, yes, it is less common, and, if you generalize, most guys wouldn't mind some free sex. It's still the exact same thing, though.

 

[12345cyclone]

Double Post

 

[12345cyclone]

You can't rape the willing.
Most men are willing.

Therefore, you can't rape men.

No, that's a completely untrue statement. I sincerely hope you were being sarcastic there.

Women can be raped. We all know that, we all accept that. A sad fact, and not one anybody condones, but sadly a true fact nonetheless. However, there seems to be an idea that a woman cannot rape a man. That is also untrue. Last I heard, the law in the UK states that a woman cannot be charged for rape, only for sexual assault. There are two ways in which a man can be raped though. One, they're raped anally by another man. That's generally seen as the worst case for most men. However, the second way is for a woman to rape a man, simply use Viagra or some other drug and trick the guy into taking it. Then rape is possible, even though the guy is unwilling he'll still have an erection from the Viagra or Viagra-type drug that he was drugged with. Hence the law stands as being incorrect.

Thing is though, rape should never be condoned and in my personal view it's only a few short steps away in severity from murder. Rape is a very serious crime and should always be treated as such. Hence I disagree with rape jokes and so on, although I've made a few in my time (I severely regret them now), and basically it's a disgusting and vile act.

The problem is that most men will not report rape and that the majority of rape/sexual assualt crimes are commited by men against women, so most people can just ignore the male rape victims and say BUT THERE ARE MORE FEMALE VICTIMS SO YOUR POINT IS NULL. Those people are extremely ignorant and I feel bad for them.

And to anyone who says most women can't overpower most men easily. Have you ever seen those female cage wrestlers? They scare the SHIT out of me. I treat them the same way I would treat Hulk Hogan. Pack my 9mm.

And this person who I quoted is very wise(the second one).

 

[xChevelle24]

You can't rape the willing.
Most men are willing.

Therefore, you can't rape men.

You're an idiot. Rude way to put it, but you are. Not all men are willing. Some may have someone they care about and are faithful to and not be willing to want to do it with other women, they can be gay, they can actually not be horny bastards, they might not be interested in the girl. It is your thinking that makes it difficult for men who are raped because this view puts it on them that they should be HAPPY about being 'raped' or something.

Anyways, this feminist actually is how feminists should be. Feminists who seem more interested in putting women above men are counter-productive and any who actually wants to make men and women genuinly equal is great in my book.

No, actually you're the idiot.

I said that MOST, yes, MOST, men are willing. I was not taking into account the, oh about 3% of us men who are not willing to have sex with any and all girls.

To clarify, my post was to be funny, for the most part. For the other part, it was kind of true, especially in today's society. I, for one, have only had sex once and am not a man-whore like most of the guys in my high-school and most of the guys I know in college.

SO!!!!....

To clarify

MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST men are willing, NOT ALL!

Oh, and to jump another point. Of course it's possible to rape a man. Don't mistake me for a fool. I was merely stating that since most guys are willing to have sex with most girls, then it wouldn't be considered "rape".

 

[Kiutu]

You can't rape the willing.
Most men are willing.

Therefore, you can't rape men.

You're an idiot. Rude way to put it, but you are. Not all men are willing. Some may have someone they care about and are faithful to and not be willing to want to do it with other women, they can be gay, they can actually not be horny bastards, they might not be interested in the girl. It is your thinking that makes it difficult for men who are raped because this view puts it on them that they should be HAPPY about being 'raped' or something.

Anyways, this feminist actually is how feminists should be. Feminists who seem more interested in putting women above men are counter-productive and any who actually wants to make men and women genuinly equal is great in my book.

No, actually you're the idiot.

I said that MOST, yes, MOST, men are willing. I was not taking into account the, oh about 3% of us men who are not willing to have sex with any and all girls.

To clarify, my post was to be funny, for the most part. For the other part, it was kind of true, especially in today's society. I, for one, have only had sex once and am not a man-whore like most of the guys in my high-school and most of the guys I know in college.

SO!!!!....

To clarify

MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST men are willing, NOT ALL!

Oh, and to jump another point. Of course it's possible to rape a man. Don't mistake me for a fool. I was merely stating that since most guys are willing to have sex with most girls, then it wouldn't be considered "rape".

Can't is short for Can not, and you said you Can NOT rape men. Also not even MOST men would want to have sex with MOST women. Most would atleast mean more than half, and take into account gay (and bisexual who prefer males), particular (men are pickier than portrayed) and faithful men, it is extemely unlikely MOST men as you put it, can't be raped by a woman.
As for you being funny, you were not, nor is this the place to be funny. I am all for a good joke, even a joking reply to a topic, but not this kind of topic when a serious discussion is the goal.

 

[xChevelle24]

You can't rape the willing.
Most men are willing.

Therefore, you can't rape men.

You're an idiot. Rude way to put it, but you are. Not all men are willing. Some may have someone they care about and are faithful to and not be willing to want to do it with other women, they can be gay, they can actually not be horny bastards, they might not be interested in the girl. It is your thinking that makes it difficult for men who are raped because this view puts it on them that they should be HAPPY about being 'raped' or something.

Anyways, this feminist actually is how feminists should be. Feminists who seem more interested in putting women above men are counter-productive and any who actually wants to make men and women genuinly equal is great in my book.

No, actually you're the idiot.

I said that MOST, yes, MOST, men are willing. I was not taking into account the, oh about 3% of us men who are not willing to have sex with any and all girls.

To clarify, my post was to be funny, for the most part. For the other part, it was kind of true, especially in today's society. I, for one, have only had sex once and am not a man-whore like most of the guys in my high-school and most of the guys I know in college.

SO!!!!....

To clarify

MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST men are willing, NOT ALL!

Oh, and to jump another point. Of course it's possible to rape a man. Don't mistake me for a fool. I was merely stating that since most guys are willing to have sex with most girls, then it wouldn't be considered "rape".

Can't is short for Can not, and you said you Can NOT rape men. Also not even MOST men would want to have sex with MOST women. Most would atleast mean more than half, and take into account gay (and bisexual who prefer males), particular (men are pickier than portrayed) and faithful men, it is extemely unlikely MOST men as you put it, can't be raped by a woman.
As for you being funny, you were not, nor is this the place to be funny. I am all for a good joke, even a joking reply to a topic, but not this kind of topic when a serious discussion is the goal.

The 12 messages within an hour be to differ :]

 

[Kiutu]

You can't rape the willing.
Most men are willing.

Therefore, you can't rape men.

You're an idiot. Rude way to put it, but you are. Not all men are willing. Some may have someone they care about and are faithful to and not be willing to want to do it with other women, they can be gay, they can actually not be horny bastards, they might not be interested in the girl. It is your thinking that makes it difficult for men who are raped because this view puts it on them that they should be HAPPY about being 'raped' or something.

Anyways, this feminist actually is how feminists should be. Feminists who seem more interested in putting women above men are counter-productive and any who actually wants to make men and women genuinly equal is great in my book.

No, actually you're the idiot.

I said that MOST, yes, MOST, men are willing. I was not taking into account the, oh about 3% of us men who are not willing to have sex with any and all girls.

To clarify, my post was to be funny, for the most part. For the other part, it was kind of true, especially in today's society. I, for one, have only had sex once and am not a man-whore like most of the guys in my high-school and most of the guys I know in college.

SO!!!!....

To clarify

MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST men are willing, NOT ALL!

Oh, and to jump another point. Of course it's possible to rape a man. Don't mistake me for a fool. I was merely stating that since most guys are willing to have sex with most girls, then it wouldn't be considered "rape".

Can't is short for Can not, and you said you Can NOT rape men. Also not even MOST men would want to have sex with MOST women. Most would atleast mean more than half, and take into account gay (and bisexual who prefer males), particular (men are pickier than portrayed) and faithful men, it is extemely unlikely MOST men as you put it, can't be raped by a woman.
As for you being funny, you were not, nor is this the place to be funny. I am all for a good joke, even a joking reply to a topic, but not this kind of topic when a serious discussion is the goal.

The 12 messages within an hour be to differ :]

Out of all of what I said, you only bothered to try and counter THAT? Ok, you are funny, funny in how narrow-minded you are. Don't even respond to me if you don't have anything valuable to say in return.

 

[xChevelle24]

You can't rape the willing.
Most men are willing.

Therefore, you can't rape men.

You're an idiot. Rude way to put it, but you are. Not all men are willing. Some may have someone they care about and are faithful to and not be willing to want to do it with other women, they can be gay, they can actually not be horny bastards, they might not be interested in the girl. It is your thinking that makes it difficult for men who are raped because this view puts it on them that they should be HAPPY about being 'raped' or something.

Anyways, this feminist actually is how feminists should be. Feminists who seem more interested in putting women above men are counter-productive and any who actually wants to make men and women genuinly equal is great in my book.

No, actually you're the idiot.

I said that MOST, yes, MOST, men are willing. I was not taking into account the, oh about 3% of us men who are not willing to have sex with any and all girls.

To clarify, my post was to be funny, for the most part. For the other part, it was kind of true, especially in today's society. I, for one, have only had sex once and am not a man-whore like most of the guys in my high-school and most of the guys I know in college.

SO!!!!....

To clarify

MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST, MOST men are willing, NOT ALL!

Oh, and to jump another point. Of course it's possible to rape a man. Don't mistake me for a fool. I was merely stating that since most guys are willing to have sex with most girls, then it wouldn't be considered "rape".

Can't is short for Can not, and you said you Can NOT rape men. Also not even MOST men would want to have sex with MOST women. Most would atleast mean more than half, and take into account gay (and bisexual who prefer males), particular (men are pickier than portrayed) and faithful men, it is extemely unlikely MOST men as you put it, can't be raped by a woman.
As for you being funny, you were not, nor is this the place to be funny. I am all for a good joke, even a joking reply to a topic, but not this kind of topic when a serious discussion is the goal.

The 12 messages within an hour be to differ :]

Out of all of what I said, you only bothered to try and counter THAT? Ok, you are funny, funny in how narrow-minded you are. Don't even respond to me if you don't have anything valuable to say in return.

What do you want me to say? You are trying to have a completely irrelevant argument. You took what I said, overanaylzed it, took it way out of context, and then bashed me for it. I made a simple statement with a very fucking simple meaning, but people like you take that way out of context. Just shut the fuck up and go troll someone else.

 

[chefassassin2]

You can't rape the willing.
Most men are willing.
Therefore, you can't rape men.

They're not who we're talking about, though.
As if it's rape, and you can't rape the willing, then the men who were willing are excluded from being counted, and we're left only with the unwilling.

Thank you. The theory of "you can't rape the willing, therefore men can't be raped" is ludicrouds to me. Personally, I like sex just as much as the next guy, but if a man or woman wanted to have sex with me and I didn't want to because I'm straight, or in a committed relationship, and I were forced into sex, I'd pretty much have to call rape. Also, just because I'm willing to have sex with my girlfriend does not mean that I'm willing to hop in the sack with just anybody. So yeah, guys can be raped.