Violent criminals getting out on bond is ridiculous.

[BoogieManFL]

Long story short, a few animals (with long criminal histories) did a home invasion robbery on a home where a brother, sister, and a friend lived. The police later found and arrested them. But then, some fucking how, these violent career criminals get to pay to be out on bond with "home confinement" but guess what? Turns out criminals don't follow the rules. I know, big surprise. The criminals go BACK to that same house a day before the vitims were to testify against them and dragged them out of their beds, lined them up side by side, and shot them each in the head execution style then went back home. Miraculously, the brother and sister survived the shots and played dead until the killers left and went next door for help.


It's shameful and disgusting that violent criminals with a long history of lawlessness (and used a gun in a home invasion) can pay money and go live comfortably at home while their victims are left traumatized and afraid in their home.


Oh, also in the news a child molester suspect simply cut off his GPS tracker and fled. Because, apparentlyit makes sense that someone like that shouldn't be in jail until his trial if he can pay money. And the tracking company didn't bother to call the police for hours.


What the fuck is wrong with people?



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2204985/Alex-Zaldivar-death-Three-friends-lined-shot-head-execution-home-day-theywere-testify-suspects-May-invasion.html

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-09-17/news/os-witness-killed-alex-zaldivar-20120917_1_home-invasion-pine-hills-home-shot-multiple-times

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/man-accused-of-sexually-abusing-children-missing/-/1637132/21752804/-/11ix8d8z/-/index.html

Does innocent until proven guilty mean anything to you? If we start locking up people wily-nily like that , we are going to have a lot of problems , especially since people are falsely accused all the time . Hell we got falsely accused people convicted for crimed they didn't commit ! But that's a discussion for another time .

Yeah, well, those innocent until proven guilty life-long criminals with extensive criminal records attempted to execute 3 people, seriously injuring 2 and killing one. So how did that work out? Did you even read?

The exception doesn't make the rule. Sure it does happen, however, hindsight is 20/20. And stating that after the fact is completly pointless.

Edit: It happens sometimes, it doesn't other times. How about all the other times it doesn't ? Should everyone be punished because of a few cases where it doesn'T work out ?

Hindsight defense is completely and utterly irrelevant. They were accused of a violent crime, with multiple eye witnesses, and that had been having trouble with the law their entire lives. It was already a known fact they were dangerous. So there is none of this 20/20 hindsight after the fact nonsense. The variables were known in advance.

 

[piinyouri]

They deserve the death penalty, simple as that.
I well aware of the neutral nature of most of this forum but please, if you have something to say in response to this, don't waste either of our time.

This just...why the fuck did I read this.