In hindsight, I found much of the complexity to be a matter of convoluted content.
It was still a good movie, even if Memento is much better.
It was still a good movie, even if Memento is much better.
Pff, Memento wasn't complicated. The whole thing is explained to you in those black and white segments.strum4h said:It was not complicated. Go watch Memento and try and figure that out.
Memento stops being complicated when you realise its just a straight up mystery/revenge plot (if even that) with the scenes moved around a little in post processing. Though I liked the idea... I thought it was an attempt at something new, however its not all that complex when you break it down or you watch it in linear fashion.James Joseph Emerald said:Pff, Memento wasn't complicated. The whole thing is explained to you in those black and white segments.strum4h said:It was not complicated. Go watch Memento and try and figure that out.
Go watch Mulholland Drive and figure that out.
I agree with 100%.strum4h said:It was not complicated. Go watch Memento and try and figure that out.
I, personally, had no trouble following the film and its various twists and turns.blackdwarf said:i know that i'm really late with asking this, but it has been bugging me for awhile now. a months or something ago i saw inception. i thought it was a clever movie with some solid actors. but what i heard was that people didn't understand it. that it was too complex to get it. not to blow my own horn (do is write the saying correctly?), but i thought it was pretty straigt forward. so am i just one of the many who also get it, or are there indeed people who thought it was too complex.
i don't will judge you if you didn't get it and shit, but i just really interested to know.
According to those I know who didn't follow the movie, the hardest part to decipher was which dream level they were looking at. I don't get that claim myself, as I found it simple as hell to tell the difference (primarily "van", "office", "fortress"), but that's what I've been told.Da Orky Man said:People found it difficult? What was complex about it? It had multiple reality levels, each having time-dilation effect to a certain magnitude to the next, with physical effects bleeding through to a certain degree. That was all.
^see above each quote is now a dream you now understand the move. Please note the contents of the quotes are meaningless.Also a quote within a quote withing a quote = quoteception.justcallmeslow said:When he's just met the new architect and is in the warehouse with her you see the top fall over. It's shown that it will spin indefinitely in dreams. You see him get back to that base level, the same as the warehouse, after the job, so it's definitely NOT a dream.Chibz said:Here's something to realize. He did something rather stupid partway through the movie: He explained how the mini-top worked to someone. The architect. So it's very real that it IS a dream, even if it functions normally as if he wasn't in one.HardkorSB said:1. If the "spinny thing" fell then each character was indeed a separate person.
2. If it kept spinning, all the characters in the movie were just projections of the protagonist (DiCaprioand they were just different aspects of his subconsciousness, representations of different parts of his personality.