Now i'm not sure how many people here at the Escapist have been following the Rugby World Cup, but here in lil' ol' New Zealand, for the last 7 weeks, like it or not; it has dominated our lives...
And now, finally as everybody here has been hoping for, the All Blacks have taken out France to win the Webber Ellis cup for the first time since the 1987 world cup!
Now I give credit to both teams for playing a great game (even if not up to previous standards) and creating an atmosphere of absolutely un-rivalled tension within Eden park. But in my opinion, France should have probably won that final. The final score was 7-8 to the AB's, and as the final stats of the game were shown, it was clear that France had dominated the field, with majority possession, territory, turnovers and scrum wins; the only facet of the game the All Blacks had beaten France in was with tackles- having made something like 20 extra tackles ontop of that of the French.
So, I ask you, Escapist, if you had been following the match, who do you think should have won the Rugby World Cup final?
OT: First post on the forums.
And now, finally as everybody here has been hoping for, the All Blacks have taken out France to win the Webber Ellis cup for the first time since the 1987 world cup!
Now I give credit to both teams for playing a great game (even if not up to previous standards) and creating an atmosphere of absolutely un-rivalled tension within Eden park. But in my opinion, France should have probably won that final. The final score was 7-8 to the AB's, and as the final stats of the game were shown, it was clear that France had dominated the field, with majority possession, territory, turnovers and scrum wins; the only facet of the game the All Blacks had beaten France in was with tackles- having made something like 20 extra tackles ontop of that of the French.
So, I ask you, Escapist, if you had been following the match, who do you think should have won the Rugby World Cup final?
OT: First post on the forums.