That's because you're reading waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much into it. As are thousands of killjoys.Rodrigo Girao said:But they ARE right. Pokémon always made me uncomfortable because the concept is very similar to animal blood sports.
That's because you're reading waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much into it. As are thousands of killjoys.Rodrigo Girao said:But they ARE right. Pokémon always made me uncomfortable because the concept is very similar to animal blood sports.
Thank god someone else pointed this out. I have to ask though, do you think Nintendo had some intentional thought over making an animal liberation group preaching and recruiting much like PETA or was it just a weird coincidence? I am thinking coincidence since this is Nintendo..Patrick_and_the_ricks said:EDIT:
I do like how the massive irony of Team Plasma went over their heads.
A group claiming to want to help animals/pokemon but in reality could care less and has questionable ulterior motives...
I'm pretty sure Nintendo haven't done anything because they're treating PETA with the contempt they deserve and are just ignoring them.ToastiestZombie said:Can't see why they haven't already. They've attacked Mario and Pokemon, two of their biggest franchises. They aren't even trying to be subtle, they're all out using their IP without permission to slander the IP in question. I'll be fine with Nintendo suing the ass off PeTA. Hell, they can get past fair use because well PeTA are f'ing showing Pokemon getting tortured and hit, something which doesn't happen in the actual games. I'm pretty sure that counts as something.Richard A. Kiernan said:I can only hope that Nintendo gun PETA down with their lawyer cannons, mostly because it would be funny.
Nintendo doesn't make pokemon, they publish it dude.Yopaz said:Thank god someone else pointed this out. I have to ask though, do you think Nintendo had some intentional thought over making an animal liberation group preaching and recruiting much like PETA or was it just a weird coincidence? I am thinking coincidence since this is Nintendo..Patrick_and_the_ricks said:EDIT:
I do like how the massive irony of Team Plasma went over their heads.
A group claiming to want to help animals/pokemon but in reality could care less and has questionable ulterior motives...
.CrazyGirl17 said:...I want to hit something now. Yes, Pokemon is sorta like animal fighting... but you have to remember they aren't real! ...Okay, so that's a... rough excuse. I still want Nintendo to sue these losers for everything they have...
But they are WRONG because Pokemon battling has shown to be mutual relationship between humans and their Pokemon, multiple times at that.Rodrigo Girao said:But they ARE right. Pokémon always made me uncomfortable because the concept is very similar to animal blood sports.
Richard A. Kiernan said:I can only hope that Nintendo gun PETA down with their lawyer cannons, mostly because it would be funny.
It's a clear case of parody and PeTA aren't charging for the game. Parody (even parody which gives an inaccurate representation of the original IP) is allowed under "fair use". Copyright law doesn't protect your IP from slander, just from someone else making commercial use of it and/or claiming authorship. Which is a good thing, because otherwise stuff like this [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/critical-miss/9485-Mass-Effect-Stock-Exchange] wouldn't be allowed.ToastiestZombie said:Can't see why they haven't already. They've attacked Mario and Pokemon, two of their biggest franchises. They aren't even trying to be subtle, they're all out using their IP without permission to slander the IP in question. I'll be fine with Nintendo suing the ass off PeTA. Hell, they can get past fair use because well PeTA are f'ing showing Pokemon getting tortured and hit, something which doesn't happen in the actual games. I'm pretty sure that counts as something.