Okay maybe I was being a bit harsh saying 40 is ridiculous. But, say you were to have a kid at 60... Then they're only gonna be 20 when your 80. Thats makes it likely that your not going to live past their 20th birthday. And I personally think thats unfair on the kid.108Stitches said:I had kids at 24 and at 42...guess what. Age doesn't matter. And why is after 40 a bit ridiculous?Phoenix09215 said:Technically its 16... But I personally can't see myself having kids until, at the earliest, 25. But if your capable and mature than any age after 16 I guess? (although after 40 is getting a bit ridiculous)
Man. Gettin' a child at that age. I don't even wanna think about it.FamoFunk said:I was 18 when I had my Daughter (4 days shy of 19)I'm now 20, my boyfriend was 23 and is now 25.
We were both and still are very much in love, we've financialy stable by working, have our own place etc.
I do a better job than most people in the late 20's/early 30's age is nothing, it's down to maturaty and financial situations.
I love your avatar.Oh That Dude said:Poor form, but /thread. I mean, there's nothing more to say really. It all depends on how capable you are as a parent and stuff.VanQQisH said:Snip
Why brush every young parent with the same brush? The last two paragraphs could be said for any age wo/manAndyFromMonday said:I cannot see how someone in their 20's could consider themselves ready for a child. Just because you CAN have one doesn't mean you should. You probably don't even have a career, your're struggling to make your relationships work and if you had a baby your attention would mostly be focused on your life and your problems instead of being focused on the child's life and the child's problems.
Raising a child isn't easy and it requires 100% dedication. When you have a child you stop thinking about what could benefit you and start thinking of what could benefit him/her. Your problems no longer matter. If you're unwilling to make those sacrifices then the child will probably end up emotionally scarred and dysfunctional and your relationship with the spawn of Satan himself will be strained. I think people undermine how complex raising a child can be and the importance of having completely involved parents in a child's life.
If you do not have stable income, are not in a good relationship and the two of you are unable to sacrifice both of your lives, figuratively speaking, then you shouldn't pop a child into the world. You'd be making a huge mistake, both to yourselves and to the child.
YEAH! PI ROCKS!Umwerfer said:No standard. When one thinks one is ready, at a time when one is confident in ones own readiness. Otherwise, you can't go wrong with 31.4159...![]()
Well, 60 is completely different than 40.Phoenix09215 said:Okay maybe I was being a bit harsh saying 40 is ridiculous. But, say you were to have a kid at 60... Then they're only gonna be 20 when your 80. Thats makes it likely that your not going to live past their 20th birthday. And I personally think thats unfair on the kid.108Stitches said:I had kids at 24 and at 42...guess what. Age doesn't matter. And why is after 40 a bit ridiculous?Phoenix09215 said:Technically its 16... But I personally can't see myself having kids until, at the earliest, 25. But if your capable and mature than any age after 16 I guess? (although after 40 is getting a bit ridiculous)