These were the two that I thought as well. Usually lawful evil is about selfish intentions, but Ozy didn't do to make himself look good. Then again, Chaotic good are notorious for not following the rules, but using their actions for the greater good. Do the number of deaths make him evil?Mercanary57 said:
Not exactly.Deathkingo said:
Disagree. Comedian is Lawful Evil. He works totally within the law; it's just not the LAW law.AkJay said:
Well, if deaths play no part in it, then he would be Chaotic good. Then again, "good" and "evil" are both relative terms that apply to every situation differently.Mercanary57 said:
That's pretty much my best guess, he's doing something illegal and otherwise very questionable, but with the intention of preventing nuclear war.coxafloppin said:
I do not think that Rorschach is chaotic neutral. He never switches to a true "evil" side, he always believes he is doing things for the "greater good".The_root_of_all_evil said:
*Gets flame thrower*A random person said:
Isn't that pretty much what Chaotic Good is? He's following his own moral compass, doing what he thinks is good. The deaths he caused were sacrificed he was prepared to make for the greater good.The_root_of_all_evil said:
Care to explain that one as well? Isn't he more Chaotic Evil? He basically does whatever he likes and tries to take what he wants without thinking about what other people want, like the Silk Spectre. He doesn't care he hurts people as long as he has what he wants.
I said he was lawful because he was doing things by a sort of moral code, though there's no question that he's breaking the actual law. Basically he's lawful, just of a different law.dududf said:*Gets flame thrower*A random person said:
"Rawr."
Seriously though, I think it's Chaotic Good, because he does good but in a sinister way, no way is he "Lawful" as the law is after him, and he takes it in his own hands (like most of the minuteman/watchman) but it's ultimately for a good cause.
Exaplain how he's Lawful, and Evil then we'll talk =P I just think you have your order reversed
Aye, but wouldn't Personal Law be considered Morals?A random person said:I said he was lawful because he was doing things by a sort of moral code, though there's no question that he's breaking the actual law. Basically he's lawful, just of a different law.dududf said:*Gets flame thrower*A random person said:
"Rawr."
Seriously though, I think it's Chaotic Good, because he does good but in a sinister way, no way is he "Lawful" as the law is after him, and he takes it in his own hands (like most of the minuteman/watchman) but it's ultimately for a good cause.
Exaplain how he's Lawful, and Evil then we'll talk =P I just think you have your order reversed
As for the evil part, that's where I sensed problems. You could argue he's good because he believed he was doing so, that one probably comes down to your views.
I just saw him as a bit of a psycho and zealot with the way he dealt with things and even some of the things he dealt with. Of course, that view is gonna get me killed, though I'll acknowledge that the basic "purging corruption" thing is noble.dududf said:Aye, but wouldn't Personal Law be considered Morals?A random person said:I said he was lawful because he was doing things by a sort of moral code, though there's no question that he's breaking the actual law. Basically he's lawful, just of a different law.dududf said:*Gets flame thrower*A random person said:
"Rawr."
Seriously though, I think it's Chaotic Good, because he does good but in a sinister way, no way is he "Lawful" as the law is after him, and he takes it in his own hands (like most of the minuteman/watchman) but it's ultimately for a good cause.
Exaplain how he's Lawful, and Evil then we'll talk =P I just think you have your order reversed
As for the evil part, that's where I sensed problems. You could argue he's good because he believed he was doing so, that one probably comes down to your views.
As to the evil, if you read the Comic book, or hell even had a keen eye/ear in the movie (I think they briefly cover it) you hear him ranting about "The Filth" by filth he is reffering to corruption. He is trying to purge Corruption from the world, from which could argueably a good cause.
Ultimately yes, you're right it depends on the perspective from which you see the charecter.
Walter Kovacs may have been Chaotic Good, but I believe that the change to Rorscach turned him Chaotic Neutral. He kills policemen because they're hunting him and tortures people. CN is the alignment of madness.Deathkingo said:
Dude i love your answerSpace Spoons said: