So you gave one guys opinion saying jrpg/wrpg is a false distinction to counter the opinion the other poster gave? It doesnt make him wrong, it means you disagree.yesbag said:They aren't seperate genres. It's simple nomenclature used erroneously to advance false stereotypes.
Next time, learn your video game history before retorting with incorrect "facts" and poorly made and laughable videos.
When im telling a friend about the great new game im playing saying its a jrpg/wrpg helps with the discription and gives him an idea about the mechanics/style. So its useful.
OT...
MassEffect trilogy.
Lots of complaints about the ending but I loved it. Great charecters, epic story, fleshed out worlds and the set pieces were awesome. Lots of people complained about the ending but it worked for me. Yes things could have been improved on like any game but I think Bioware could never have met th expectations of fans. There was just too much hype.
Dragon Age: Origins
I loved this game. Again great charecters and politics. The battle system was more old school and a real challenge on harder difficulties which I really liked but it put some younger gamers who werent used to Baldurs gate style combat off. Some criticised the world as overly LOTR but i quite liked the twist with elven underclass Ghettos, it felt more modern to me. I liked the moral choices as they felt far reaching and like an actual choice rather than gaming your good/bad meter.
Ive missed a lot of the wrpgs this generation. Played Dishonoured where i loved the world but was disappointed by the game. Im still planning to pick up witcher2 and alpha protocol. I played Morrow wind to death but it left me feeling I had nothing left to see or do with skyrim so I passed on it. The lack of charecters puts me off.