Destiny has had its higher points (House of Wolves and Age of Triumph, and to some extent Forsaken) where it briefly lived up to glimmers of its potential. But Activision or Bungie alone they can't seem to keep their fingers off the reset button and manage to kill whatever progress they make within months.Lufia Erim said:- Destiny. Yes the shooting is amazing. But otherwise the only good thing about destiny is the people who play it.
For my own part, I'd have to actually align with B-cell, and take GTA 5. The driving isn't awful, but retains enough of the awkward "realism" driving from 4 to weigh it down. In keeping with this, the sandbox mayhem that really made the series work (Aside from its hokey movie ripoff storylines) was basically non-existent or shovelled off to be dumped in the money-mill pit of GTA Online. Beyond looking pretty (at the time, its wearing abit nowadays compared to the proper current gen games, and the animations were always complete garbage) not much to really give to it.
Ac Origins is a pretty good pick too. Yes, it stands out because AC needed a shift. But in terms of actual execution of teh new ARPG would-be gameplay, its only a couple steps above Eurojank. The combat isn't tight or balanced at all. The progression is bland as bland can be. Bayek would probably rate in top 3 or 4 protagonists as a likable dude and all, but the main story's kind of drowned in the splurge of uninspired sandboxing.
I thought New Colossus was prettymuch universally kind of "meh"'d at too, so I dunno about overrated. No one seemed too far off the page of "Why is this so short and obviously sequel baity. Why did all the stealth design vanish. etc). Whats with the random metroidvania traversal powers that don't actually get used in the design ever" etc.