I'm reading The Shadow Rising by Robert Jordan and playing the demo for Duke Nukem 3d. I wanted to return to simplier gaming.
Thats likely, care to explain it to me?monstersquad said:Wow, you're obviously oblivious to the subtext inherent in what you just complained about.Mr Pantomime said:Just finished Mass Effect 2. Was going to go back to Mass Effect 1 and make Alien-hating Male Shepard, but I uninstalled it and lent my friend the disk. So ill have to shake him down for it tomorrow. Might finish Bioshock or play Persona 4.
Im reading The Republic by Plato right now. Cant say im impressed as far. Everyone but Socrates is either a yesman or someone who argues clumsily simply for Socrates to argue circles around him. Theyre only there to push Plato's idea of his Republic, rather than arguing the questionable morality of it. Hopefully it gets better.
IT can't be explained. The things I've taken from it and the things you'll take from it will always be shaded by our perceptions and therefore different. Think about what's being said and the tone that it's presented in. Then think about what's not being said. Every part of the text is there to evoke a response and fire your perception of the situation in a different way the more you look at the way it makes you feel, and why.Mr Pantomime said:Thats likely, care to explain it to me?monstersquad said:Wow, you're obviously oblivious to the subtext inherent in what you just complained about.Mr Pantomime said:Just finished Mass Effect 2. Was going to go back to Mass Effect 1 and make Alien-hating Male Shepard, but I uninstalled it and lent my friend the disk. So ill have to shake him down for it tomorrow. Might finish Bioshock or play Persona 4.
Im reading The Republic by Plato right now. Cant say im impressed as far. Everyone but Socrates is either a yesman or someone who argues clumsily simply for Socrates to argue circles around him. Theyre only there to push Plato's idea of his Republic, rather than arguing the questionable morality of it. Hopefully it gets better.
Ill consider that when I read it. The book has given me a lot to think about. But thats not what I was complaining about. I was getting annoyed that Socrates and Glaucon said they were going to have a debate, but Socrates just shapes an idea of a just society while Glaucon agrees with him. Theres not conflict, which is an essential part of a debate. Im only up to page 100.monstersquad said:IT can't be explained. The things I've taken from it and the things you'll take from it will always be shaded by our perceptions and therefore different. Think about what's being said and the tone that it's presented in. Then think about what's not being said. Every part of the text is there to evoke a response and fire your perception of the situation in a different way the more you look at the way it makes you feel, and why.Mr Pantomime said:Thats likely, care to explain it to me?monstersquad said:Wow, you're obviously oblivious to the subtext inherent in what you just complained about.Mr Pantomime said:Just finished Mass Effect 2. Was going to go back to Mass Effect 1 and make Alien-hating Male Shepard, but I uninstalled it and lent my friend the disk. So ill have to shake him down for it tomorrow. Might finish Bioshock or play Persona 4.
Im reading The Republic by Plato right now. Cant say im impressed as far. Everyone but Socrates is either a yesman or someone who argues clumsily simply for Socrates to argue circles around him. Theyre only there to push Plato's idea of his Republic, rather than arguing the questionable morality of it. Hopefully it gets better.