What Blizzard does well

Recommended Videos

ThePlasmatizer

New member
Sep 2, 2008
1,261
0
0
What Blizzard does well?

hmm maybe charging people for everything?

I understand the great overall gameplay experiences that their games have but really I don't think a games developer should be so set on making money that they don't care about community or public relations.
 

Zeke the Freak

New member
Jan 27, 2009
191
0
0
oliveira8 said:
Zeke the Freak said:
oliveira8 said:
Zeke the Freak said:
oliveira8 said:
And to wrap things up. SC2 is indeed coming in 3 seperate games(you just need to buy one for the multi-player) but they are not all coming at the same time as many think. And yes I do know about the new stuff on the campaign for DoW2 my only disapointment with it is that we only get to play as one race. But im still buying DoW2 and SC2 independently if they suck or not.
And that, my well spoken freind, is the truth.
What ever happend to space tauren any ways?
I think they were some kind of joke to test the engine or just to tease the players. Maybe we can get to play with a couple in the campaign like the Pandaren or the hidden unit Hydralisk in WC3.
This cannot be, can it?
They had the whole info page completed with videos, screenshots and animations complete!
They even had backstory. Then I tried to show my freind that I wasnt lying and POOF! They're gone!
Blizzard sometimes wastes to much time doing useless stuff. I guess the Space Taurens(I remenber seeing them long time ago so you not crazy!) were one of the April Fool's jokes of them or really just a tease either way expect to see some kind of reference to WoW/WC3 in SC2 just like WC3 had the Hydralisk.
But... Why?!? What kind of faggotry is this!?! They get me all riled up then pull the rug out from under me? Those bastards. I swear, one of these days Im gonna kick SC's creater in the nuts so hard that he'll be digesting his nads by the time I'm done with him.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Zeke the Freak said:
oliveira8 said:
Zeke the Freak said:
This cannot be, can it?
They had the whole info page completed with videos, screenshots and animations complete!
They even had backstory. Then I tried to show my freind that I wasnt lying and POOF! They're gone!
Blizzard sometimes wastes to much time doing useless stuff. I guess the Space Taurens(I remenber seeing them long time ago so you not crazy!) were one of the April Fool's jokes of them or really just a tease either way expect to see some kind of reference to WoW/WC3 in SC2 just like WC3 had the Hydralisk.
But... Why?!? What kind of faggotry is this!?! They get me all riled up then pull the rug out from under me? Those bastards. I swear, one of these days Im gonna kick SC's creater in the nuts so hard that he'll be digesting his nads by the time I'm done with him.

They are out there http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQFcHaI9NXs

http://www.wowinsider.com/2008/04/01/blizzard-announces-tauren-marines-as-the-latest-starcraft-2-unit/ check the date
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Zeke the Freak said:
theultimateend said:
Fronken said:
Somthing said:
Fronken said:
Wouldukindly said:
Taking Warhammer Fantasy and 40k and crafting them into something good enough that I don't accuse them of ripping it off.
This ^

There is no doubt that Blizzard has Games Workshop to thank for their success/fame.

Warcraft = Warhammer Fantasy Battles
Starcraft = 40k

There's no doubt the races have been stolen, orcs and humans are, well orcs and humans, but the most obvious ones are in Starcraft, where both the Marines and the Zergs are ripped straight from 40k (Space Marines/Tyranids).

But still they manage to make an interesting storyline themselfs, even though their starting pieces were stolen.
im not arguing against the starcraft franchise may being ripped (dont really care) but the orcs and humans coming from warhammer? I would say that orcs were not made by warhammer first. i think (not sure) that they came mostly from Tolkien.
Orcs were made up by J.R.R Tolkien to the best of my knowledge, but it was Warhammer who set the standard for Orcs when it comes to look and color, The orcs described in LOTR were black, but it wasnt until Warhammer Fantasy Battles came along that the standard became Green for Orcs and Goblins (as in Greenskins).

So the orcs in Warcraft is undoubtably taken from Warhammer.
Likewise it's probably much older than Tokien.

Most fantasy races are built around stereotypes of actual races or exaggerations of physical and mental disorders.

There was a book I read a while back that went over different fantasy races and their origins and most were pretty solidly tied with real world references (as one would guess I imagine).

Orcs in particular are a fantasy manifestation of a very closeminded view of a certain group of people that were regularly defeated by the rational heroic white warriors. I won't go deeper than that because I doubt it's the proper direction to take a blizzard conversation.

Likewise don't forget to check when certain races in Warhammer 40k actually came into existence (in the real world) before you start figuring out who came from what :) (not that it matters).

Starcraft 1998
(Who I feel Protoss are like) Tau 1998
Tyranids however 2004
Well some one needs to brush up on their history. WH40k was a board game like 20+ years before all of that. It had all the races and more. SC undoubtedly got their races from WH with a minor tweak from tau to protoss. (Ill admit, the guys who created tyranids got a little inspiration from the movie "alien")
Well I misread which is my fault but still I don't believe all races were in Warhammer from the very beginning. In the very Beginning Warhammer wasn't even consistent (Space marines were much taller than they are now, Orks had entirely different systems of reproduction and ish, and there are probably other things not coming to mind).

From a double scan over it appears that Tyranids were introduced in 1990 (in Space hulk).

"The first recognisable incarnation of Tyranid warriors appeared in Advanced Space Crusade in 1990, featuring biological weaponry such as boneswords and deathspitters.[9]" - Wiki.

Which is 3 years after WH40k started (well 3-4). So not all the races and more were from the get go. I mean they had all sorts of funky little races they talked about in the beginning but most of them were just sidestories that have been all but invalidated by newer lore stuff like the Xenology book.

Anywho yeah on looking back at dates you are right (which I felt was the case till a recent googlage left me with tyranids and tau being much more recent official enterances into the TT game).

Which is sort of how I rate it, a race isn't real until its part of the tabletop setup. I mean they could essentially name of 90 million alien races but unless they have a concrete imagining of them that I can see I don't feel its a valid placemat.
 

Prower

New member
Jan 14, 2009
26
0
0
what Blizz did well with WoW was everything, face facts they are the trend setters in MMO's of course other games got PvP better others PvE.

Blizzard still come out ahead of their class, for the simple reason that those tiny flaws are what players try to minimize, and because the flaws are always there there it is something to aim for =P

admitadly its comunity don't always flatter blizz but they can't be held responcible for the large number 'undesirable' players
 

Spacelord

New member
May 7, 2008
1,811
0
0
Zeke the Freak said:
You've never fell victim to the "zerglin rush"?!?!?
you musnt've been playin too long then because damn near every zerg user out there uses it.
In earlier versions the zergling rush was really good, but still managable - especially when playing Terrans, since their SCV's have 60 hp instead of the 40hp of the protoss and zerg workers. You could beat off a zerg rush, granted that the other player isn't a gosu micro god.
Then they bumped the spawning pool cost up to 200 minerals, and they're even easier to defeat. A bunker and a few SCV's repairing is enough to stay safe. By then, the other player's economy is usually pretty shot, so then you just wait for siege tanks and blow the hell out of him.

tl;dr I eat rushers for breakfast
 

Zeke the Freak

New member
Jan 27, 2009
191
0
0
theultimateend said:
Zeke the Freak said:
theultimateend said:
Fronken said:
Somthing said:
Fronken said:
Wouldukindly said:
Taking Warhammer Fantasy and 40k and crafting them into something good enough that I don't accuse them of ripping it off.
This ^

There is no doubt that Blizzard has Games Workshop to thank for their success/fame.

Warcraft = Warhammer Fantasy Battles
Starcraft = 40k

There's no doubt the races have been stolen, orcs and humans are, well orcs and humans, but the most obvious ones are in Starcraft, where both the Marines and the Zergs are ripped straight from 40k (Space Marines/Tyranids).

But still they manage to make an interesting storyline themselfs, even though their starting pieces were stolen.
im not arguing against the starcraft franchise may being ripped (dont really care) but the orcs and humans coming from warhammer? I would say that orcs were not made by warhammer first. i think (not sure) that they came mostly from Tolkien.
Orcs were made up by J.R.R Tolkien to the best of my knowledge, but it was Warhammer who set the standard for Orcs when it comes to look and color, The orcs described in LOTR were black, but it wasnt until Warhammer Fantasy Battles came along that the standard became Green for Orcs and Goblins (as in Greenskins).

So the orcs in Warcraft is undoubtably taken from Warhammer.
Likewise it's probably much older than Tokien.

Most fantasy races are built around stereotypes of actual races or exaggerations of physical and mental disorders.

There was a book I read a while back that went over different fantasy races and their origins and most were pretty solidly tied with real world references (as one would guess I imagine).

Orcs in particular are a fantasy manifestation of a very closeminded view of a certain group of people that were regularly defeated by the rational heroic white warriors. I won't go deeper than that because I doubt it's the proper direction to take a blizzard conversation.

Likewise don't forget to check when certain races in Warhammer 40k actually came into existence (in the real world) before you start figuring out who came from what :) (not that it matters).

Starcraft 1998
(Who I feel Protoss are like) Tau 1998
Tyranids however 2004
Well some one needs to brush up on their history. WH40k was a board game like 20+ years before all of that. It had all the races and more. SC undoubtedly got their races from WH with a minor tweak from tau to protoss. (Ill admit, the guys who created tyranids got a little inspiration from the movie "alien")
Well I misread which is my fault but still I don't believe all races were in Warhammer from the very beginning. In the very Beginning Warhammer wasn't even consistent (Space marines were much taller than they are now, Orks had entirely different systems of reproduction and ish, and there are probably other things not coming to mind).

From a double scan over it appears that Tyranids were introduced in 1990 (in Space hulk).

"The first recognisable incarnation of Tyranid warriors appeared in Advanced Space Crusade in 1990, featuring biological weaponry such as boneswords and deathspitters.[9]" - Wiki.

Which is 3 years after WH40k started (well 3-4). So not all the races and more were from the get go. I mean they had all sorts of funky little races they talked about in the beginning but most of them were just sidestories that have been all but invalidated by newer lore stuff like the Xenology book.

Anywho yeah on looking back at dates you are right (which I felt was the case till a recent googlage left me with tyranids and tau being much more recent official enterances into the TT game).

Which is sort of how I rate it, a race isn't real until its part of the tabletop setup. I mean they could essentially name of 90 million alien races but unless they have a concrete imagining of them that I can see I don't feel its a valid placemat.
Right you are. It's not like I really care that SC ripped of WH40k really. They still use 2 different styles of gameplay (squad based/individually controlled).
 

Woe Is You

New member
Jul 5, 2008
1,444
0
0
Zeke the Freak said:
You've never fell victim to the "zerglin rush"?!?!?
you musnt've been playin too long then because damn near every zerg user out there uses it.
The thing about a zergling rush, though, is that if you use it and end up having your lings killed (by a player who, say, counters them with a bunker and a marine), you've essentially lost the game if you're playing against a player that's at least as skilled as you are. In fact, most rushes involve setting back your economy for the sake of the rush, so betting on one is highly highly risky.
 

Archaeology Hat

New member
Nov 6, 2007
430
0
0
I'm pretty sure that the Tau were the product of 3rd or 4th Ed Warhammer 40k, and came relatively late on it its cycle, it'll be in the 2000s that they were released, theyre certainly not from 1998.

They and the Necrons were the "New" races for 40k in that edition, although Necrons were more a reworking of an older idea.

Bit like Ogre Kingdoms for fantasty.

The tyranids were definatly in Warhammer 40k by the time the 2nd edition came along but heres the catch They did not resemble the Zerg that much.

3rd Edition Tyranids: http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w264/mjobrien10/wholearmy.jpg (2005)

2nd Edition Tyranids: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2015/2308307957_3a08474652_b.jpg (1995)

Zerg, Starcraft: http://www.hvrsd.k12.nj.us/Timberlane/students/Dcooper/images/Zergling.gif (1998)

Visually, the Zerg from starcaft resember the 3rd Edtion Tyranids more than they do the 2nd edition. (All images the property of their respective owners)

This is not to say that Blizzard are completely innocent of minor plagurism, the runes on Arthas' sword in this cutscene at about 1:36ish (SPOILERS): http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VGtbWA_FGMc
bear significant similarities to Warhammer fantasy high-elf runes from various High-elf lore-sources from that game.

That said, I'm not sure this, apparent mutual pagurism is particularly resented by either side (Games Workshop or Blizzard) as they are both very successful companies and niether seems to really suffer from it. To be honest I wouldn't be overly suprised if there was a certain amount of back and forth between Blizzard employees and Games Workshop's US employees.

Edit: I am aware of how much i just nerded my pants.
 

cannot_aim

New member
Dec 18, 2008
392
0
0
I'm a big fan of Blizzard all of their games are balanced and they are dedicated to the people who buy their games by frequently updating and making sure that one side isnt overwhelmingly powerful. This even happens in WoW even though the client base their can be at best described as "interesting".
 

Zeke the Freak

New member
Jan 27, 2009
191
0
0
2000!?!
I could have sworn the tau were around in the 1990's.
But what ever you say man.
doesnt matter though. They are both really good games. Both may be guilty of minor plagerism (from each other? and Alien) but, as i said before, have tons of originallity...
oh wait...
no... no they dont lol. Well we can say WH40k did because it came befor the "scifi era" but I have reasons to beleive that SC was following the crowd lol. But who cares. I do love me a good seige tank spam.
 

Archaeology Hat

New member
Nov 6, 2007
430
0
0
Zeke the Freak said:
2000!?!
I could have sworn the tau were around in the 1990's.
But what ever you say man.
doesnt matter though. They are both really good games. Both may be guilty of minor plagerism (from each other? and Alien) but, as i said before, have tons of originallity...
oh wait...
no... no they dont lol. Well we can say WH40k did because it came befor the "scifi era" but I have reasons to beleive that SC was following the crowd lol. But who cares. I do love me a good seige tank spam.
Tau Army Codex was published on the 6th of October 2001.
 

Zeke the Freak

New member
Jan 27, 2009
191
0
0
Archaeology Hat said:
Zeke the Freak said:
2000!?!
I could have sworn the tau were around in the 1990's.
But what ever you say man.
doesnt matter though. They are both really good games. Both may be guilty of minor plagerism (from each other? and Alien) but, as i said before, have tons of originallity...
oh wait...
no... no they dont lol. Well we can say WH40k did because it came befor the "scifi era" but I have reasons to beleive that SC was following the crowd lol. But who cares. I do love me a good seige tank spam.
Tau Army Codex was published on the 6th of October 2001.
I know. you told me lol.
well i guess SC has a protoss going for it, originallity wise.
 

Charli

New member
Nov 23, 2008
3,445
0
0
samsprinkle said:
archwiccan said:
samsprinkle said:
archwiccan said:
samsprinkle said:
Blizzard is pretty good. I like Diablo myself. But WoW is just too exspenive. I'm shocked that peope can afford to play that. Don't they care about stuff? Like booze?
honnestly 15 bucks a month for the ammount of content and hours of game play you will get, is worth it, just imagine people pay 5 bucks a month for Rune Scape
Runescape...lol
i rest my case
Runescape...ROFLMAOWKSOMDBIC.
No wait! Wait, I can one up that.

MapleStory.


Yeah. Very little will top that amount of lol.
 

Zeke the Freak

New member
Jan 27, 2009
191
0
0
Charli said:
samsprinkle said:
archwiccan said:
samsprinkle said:
archwiccan said:
samsprinkle said:
Blizzard is pretty good. I like Diablo myself. But WoW is just too exspenive. I'm shocked that peope can afford to play that. Don't they care about stuff? Like booze?
honnestly 15 bucks a month for the ammount of content and hours of game play you will get, is worth it, just imagine people pay 5 bucks a month for Rune Scape
Runescape...lol
i rest my case
Runescape...ROFLMAOWKSOMDBIC.
No wait! Wait, I can one up that.

MapleStory.


Yeah. Very little will top that amount of lol.
exept your sociol life.
OH SHIT!
lol im sorry i just couldnt resist.
 

matrix3509

New member
Sep 24, 2008
1,372
0
0
Lancer723 said:
matrix3509 said:
Starcraft is actually only balanced in the hands of human players of equal skill level. The AI however is completely biased toward the Protoss race. I can prove it to you:

Go into Starcraft and set six players as computers, two Terran, two Zerg, and two Protoss. Add to that a human observer player so you can watch. Now start the map. You can go off and do something else while you wait for the game to finish. When the game is done, go back and look at the results. IIRC almost 95% of time, the Protoss will win. There was a link I visited sometime ago that did this same thing 1000 times over to build of a good data set. I tried it too with about 50 games over time. The other 5% of the time, the Zerg won. Never did the Terrans win. It was strange to me because Terran was my favorite race. I could win all the time with Terran.

Its really easy to see the flaws in the AI now and exploit them, but for its time, the AI was super advanced.
I used to play me with me and a friend on a ladder map vs two comps all the time and i never noticed a difference in difficulty based on race.
I did, however, notice a difficulty change based on difference in color.

Comp : White + Terran= unstoppable god-machine capable of crumbling my defenses with a surly look, Red Protoss and IIRC it was purple Zerg.
Dunno if it was a real pattern, However I always thought that multiplayer comp difficulty was relative to the same comps (Color/Race wise) that you faced in the campaign, meaning the later comps made harder enemies.

Just a personal theory, never tested, thought I might add to the discussion.
Well, its been proven (I'm my case, as well as many other cases) that the Computer is a better player as a Protoss than any other race, but they still are nothing compared to a human player. I think the computer cheats as a Protoss also because they would send out their Templars to Psi Storm the bejesus out of me. I experimented with it one time and I found out the Templars are much more efficient when you group your units via hotkey. This made me think that the comp knew I was using hotkeys. The next time a played, I refrained from using hotkeys at all and the Templar Psi Storm efficiency dropped dramatically.

Also, there are pre-made scripts for difficulty. The highest difficulty script is called insane difficulty. It makes it impossible for the comp to ever go broke. This enables the comp to continually send units your way, even when all of the resources on the map are gone. However even that script has its quirks that are easy to exploit. The only time the Insane Difficulty script is actually difficult is at the beginning of the game, because usually the initial attack is around 16 zealots IIRC. Its hard because unless you are a master clicker, you wont have much in the way of defenses. The problem with the Insane Difficulty is that, even though money is infinite for them, the computer still plays as if resources are important, so there still wont be massive carrier fleets or multiple zealot squad rushes.

In regard to your playing the Protoss computer, its easily explained as to why the difficulty didn't increase for you: You are Human, the computer can never and will never be able to predict human moves. The test I mentioned above was just for computers playing against each other and no human players.

Also, you say that the computer gets harder as you play the campaign through. It actually doesn't. As you go through the campaign, the only thing that changes is the degree to which the computer cheats. During the later missions of Brood War, the computer(s) have massive starting bases. With an equally massive starting resource reserve.
 

Charli

New member
Nov 23, 2008
3,445
0
0
Zeke the Freak said:
Charli said:
samsprinkle said:
archwiccan said:
samsprinkle said:
archwiccan said:
samsprinkle said:
Blizzard is pretty good. I like Diablo myself. But WoW is just too exspenive. I'm shocked that peope can afford to play that. Don't they care about stuff? Like booze?
honnestly 15 bucks a month for the ammount of content and hours of game play you will get, is worth it, just imagine people pay 5 bucks a month for Rune Scape
Runescape...lol
i rest my case
Runescape...ROFLMAOWKSOMDBIC.
No wait! Wait, I can one up that.

MapleStory.


Yeah. Very little will top that amount of lol.
exept your sociol life.
OH SHIT!
lol im sorry i just couldnt resist.
With the economy the way it is, I laugh at anyone able to afford any kind of regular social life. Laaaaaugh. Hell thats why I figure its monday and and WoW is packed to its ears...on the European servers at that.
 

I3uster

New member
Nov 16, 2008
409
0
0
Anonymouse said:
Like hell Starcraft is balanced... I have no idea what magical mystical game you played but it sure as hell aint SC.
If this is a joke: haha
If its not: I hope this is a joke, if yes see above