What could replace War?

Recommended Videos

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
AlexWinter said:
Woodsey said:
AkJay said:
Technically, the Nuclear Bomb ended war. with it's creation and first time use, people were scared shitless. Sure, we've had conflicts in the past (Vietnam, Korea) but nothing that would classify as a full-scale war.
True - this is why I'm not sure people who are dead-cert we should all destroy our nukes have properly thought things through.
It's not really peace though is it. It's more like stalemate based on fear. Although I wouldn't put that past Russia either.
Stalemates seem to last a lot longer than peace.
 

Kelthurin

New member
Jun 18, 2009
204
0
0
OptimusPrime33 said:
Furburt said:
Football? It's nationalistic and violent enough.
But America would always win! That's the problem, we created football.
America is the only country in the world that actually cares about that kind of "Football" you know.

The rest of us play what you call "Soccer", but what is called Football by THE REST OF THE PLANET.

Catch the drift?
 

Capachinola

New member
Dec 28, 2009
162
0
0
Probably just getting along like we probably should have done 19 quadrillion years ago when humans first walked out of the water or whatever.
 

mayney93

New member
Aug 3, 2009
719
0
0
AkJay said:
Technically, the Nuclear Bomb ended war. with it's creation and first time use, people were scared shitless. Sure, we've had conflicts in the past (Vietnam, Korea) but nothing that would classify as a full-scale war. So now instead of fighting, we created the UN to talk things out.
yet still people are killing people? that is war surually
 

Lemon Of Life

New member
Jul 8, 2009
1,494
0
0
AkJay said:
Technically, the Nuclear Bomb ended war. with it's creation and first time use, people were scared shitless. Sure, we've had conflicts in the past (Vietnam, Korea) but nothing that would classify as a full-scale war. So now instead of fighting, we created the UN to talk things out.
Over 2 million men died in Vietnam. Show some respect, and get a dictionary. If that isn't a 'full scale war' then you're an idiot.
 

Blimey

New member
Nov 10, 2009
604
0
0
Having several armies stand in muddy, dank trenches, occasionally popping their heads up to take some pot-shots at the other guys, also in trenches.

Oh wait...
 

martin's a madman

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,319
0
0
Lemon Of Life said:
AkJay said:
Technically, the Nuclear Bomb ended war. with it's creation and first time use, people were scared shitless. Sure, we've had conflicts in the past (Vietnam, Korea) but nothing that would classify as a full-scale war. So now instead of fighting, we created the UN to talk things out.
Over 2 million men died in Vietnam. Show some respect, and get a dictionary. If that isn't a 'full scale war' then you're an idiot.

I think what he means is multiple developed nations exchanging tough looks and bullets. Vietnam wouldn't classify as that because not to offend, but it's a country that most of the world doesn't really care all that much about.
 

martin's a madman

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,319
0
0
Blimey said:
Having several armies stand in muddy, dank trenches, occasionally popping their heads up to take some pot-shots at the other guys, also in trenches.

Oh wait...
I see what you did there.
 

Nico III

New member
Apr 16, 2008
89
0
0
There seems to be a grave misunderstanding of war. The way you're implying would be war is declared, the two parties have a fight, they declare a winner then go home for tea.
War is about one group of people going to last resort methods to achieve an objective (i.e. eliminate a dangerous leader) and the other side defending themselves.
Therefore nothing will replace war, it will always be a last resort.
 

Ramses the Third

New member
Aug 24, 2009
68
0
0
Xanadu84 said:
The problem with an alternative to war is that if a country wants something bad enough to go to war, when they lose the alternative, they will just ignore the results. And then the only way to stop them is...war. Also, you can't really ignore revolutionaries, as whatever it is they are doing is going to screw up your country. Sadly, there is no alternative to war, you just have to try to avoid war in the first place.

OptimusPrime33 said:
Furburt said:
Football? It's nationalistic and violent enough.
But America would always win! That's the problem, we created football.
Oh boy...be prepared to be teased. For a little future foresight, go wiki or google Football first, my fellow American.
when you google football the first thing is the NFL site
 

L14Soccer

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6
0
0
Yo Leader fights. You know, like Yo mama fights. Seems just as "entertaining" or ammusing but not near as deadly as war. In the end, they all win for having a good laugh at the end of the day.
 

dsmops2003

New member
Sep 23, 2009
563
0
0
Replace war and decide international disputes by means of female Jello wrestling. Best 2 out of 3 of course...