What could replace War?
- Thread starter TheLefty
- Start date
Recommended Videos
NO matter what we pick China is gonna win.
I like the idea of a champion from one country fighting a champion from another country.
Knights or something equaly medievil.
I like the idea of a champion from one country fighting a champion from another country.
Knights or something equaly medievil.
Children's card games with realistic holograms. That, or as was suggested above, a G Gundam style giant robot fighting tournament.
A constitutional requirement that anyone who votes for a country to GO to war, has to fight on the front lines.
He ment the one where you use your foot to kick the ballOptimusPrime33 said:
Not your hand to throw the egg.
The greatest (as in largest) powers in the world hold nukes - being basically the same ones who want to fight each other all the time (but don't) makes this a pretty safe position to be in. If everyone can nuke, no one will nuke, with the knowledge that err... Well, they can be nuked.Furburt said:
Of course you could still argue that if there were no nukes things would be better - but then we'd all be more likely to be invading each other again, like we have done through much of history.
The problem with an alternative to war is that if a country wants something bad enough to go to war, when they lose the alternative, they will just ignore the results. And then the only way to stop them is...war. Also, you can't really ignore revolutionaries, as whatever it is they are doing is going to screw up your country. Sadly, there is no alternative to war, you just have to try to avoid war in the first place.
Oh boy...be prepared to be teased. For a little future foresight, go wiki or google Football first, my fellow American.OptimusPrime33 said:
The BIGGEST MW2 match ever made.
That or the invent like a really really complex game...kinda like Risk...but more complex.
That or the invent like a really really complex game...kinda like Risk...but more complex.
"Terrorism".
Allegiances wil stop being defined by the colour of your skin or the nation of your birth. They'll be defined by what ideology you have, whether that be religious extremism or simple political affiliations.
The borders of the world are being eroded like never before by migration of population and clear affirmative military action will be increasingly replaced by covert support of minor factions.
I mean the CIA were well into that stuff for the Cold War, you'd better believe they'll try it if they can get the results they want against anyone else.
Allegiances wil stop being defined by the colour of your skin or the nation of your birth. They'll be defined by what ideology you have, whether that be religious extremism or simple political affiliations.
The borders of the world are being eroded like never before by migration of population and clear affirmative military action will be increasingly replaced by covert support of minor factions.
I mean the CIA were well into that stuff for the Cold War, you'd better believe they'll try it if they can get the results they want against anyone else.
USA might feel left out, they will come with some sort of egg and pads touching it with their handsFurburt said:
[small] I know they won't and this is all a joke. [/small]
edit: Looks like an earlier post kinda gave me some evidence
