What could replace War?

Recommended Videos

JaymesFogarty

New member
Aug 19, 2009
1,054
0
0
Furburt said:
Woodsey said:
True - this is why I'm not sure people who are dead-cert we should all destroy our nukes have properly thought things through.
Yes, but I'd still rather not have them laying around.

They worry me.
Right now, the bodies of people that own nukes are governments, and terrorists. IF the government gets rid of their nukes, who still has the nukes?
 

The DSM

New member
Apr 18, 2009
2,066
0
0
All the leaders of the countries enter a ring, one leaves.

I think Vladamir Putin could snap peoples necks, im scared.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
reasonable discussion. But with the amount of unreasonable people in the world that won't happen for a while.

or play each other at Mortal Combat. at least that would be a slight bit funny
 

AlexWinter

New member
Jun 24, 2009
401
0
0
Woodsey said:
AlexWinter said:
So we're agreeing?
No, that's why I wrote something different to what you did.

So with or without peace there will be paranoia. But with nukes there is reason to be paranoid. Get rid of the nukes and we could have a shot at real peace if the media didn't freak out everytime something insignificant happened.
 

someotherguy

New member
Nov 15, 2009
483
0
0
A really large game of chess.

Imagine it, a room of say.. 100,000 people, each matched up against an enemy to battle with.

whoever wins the chess match wins partially for their country. Whichever country wins more matches wins the war.
 

YoUnG205

Ugh!...
Oct 13, 2009
884
0
0
Political Leaders dueling with swords. It with bring world peace not to mention it wiuld be one of the funniest thing you will ever see. Imagine Gordon Brown Lolz!
 

Xpwn3ntial

Avid Reader
Dec 22, 2008
8,023
0
0
stonethered said:
Xpwn3ntial said:
I invoke the idea that each nation picks one warrior to fight to the death in Chernobyll and the winner's nation makes the rules. The nations that are prohibited from entry are the ones without nuclear weaponry. Yes, that narrows it down quite a bit.

EDIT: This is done every 20 years.
I assume the 'chernobyll' bit is so we can't reuse warriors.


Sadly, this would mean the russians and their steroids and meticulous athletics programs would smash the media-governed antics of the western world. Well, it would for about the first three or four times before the Americans gave in and pulled out the stops.

It bothers me that I would support this plan anyways.
I anticipated that, and ruled that the winner would be immediately picked up in a helicopter and drug tested immediately. The rest of the warriors would be picked up over the next few hours by a U.N. investigative force. Should any nation cheat in that way, the highest ranked (longest lived) runner up's nation would win. Should all of them cheat, they have to start all over.

I picked Chernobyll because it's pretty there, in a horrible way.
P.S.: You shouldn't be bothered by this, it's better than war, isn't it?