As per the title. Since the Oscars came and went and it's been out for a while in the rest of the world, I thought I'd ask this question.
In my opinion the hype was very, very undeserved. Oh sure, Scorsese's a great director, it had a lot of really fun stuff in it and the performances were phenomenal. I don't think it's a bad film by any means. But my foremost thoughts upon leaving the theatre were that the movie was way too long and that I'd seen the exact same movie at least twice before from Scorsese. I wasn't expecting it, but I sided more with Mark Kermode's view on the film [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot0KC1s1U1g] than any other critic's. Did we really need to see yet another scene of incessant partying, boozing and taking drugs when there's nothing separating it from the last 2 previous such scenes? Why should we care when the feds start snooping around if it won't have any consequences for at least 1,5 hours of the film? Why did Scorsese make the character have a sympathetic moment where he talks how he saved one of his employees from crushing debt, but doesn't bring up the dozens of victims who blew their life savings on the guy's bullshit scams?
It wasn't a bad movie, but certainly not the movie messiah it was hyped up to be. 3,5 stars. Sue me.
Your thoughts?
In my opinion the hype was very, very undeserved. Oh sure, Scorsese's a great director, it had a lot of really fun stuff in it and the performances were phenomenal. I don't think it's a bad film by any means. But my foremost thoughts upon leaving the theatre were that the movie was way too long and that I'd seen the exact same movie at least twice before from Scorsese. I wasn't expecting it, but I sided more with Mark Kermode's view on the film [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot0KC1s1U1g] than any other critic's. Did we really need to see yet another scene of incessant partying, boozing and taking drugs when there's nothing separating it from the last 2 previous such scenes? Why should we care when the feds start snooping around if it won't have any consequences for at least 1,5 hours of the film? Why did Scorsese make the character have a sympathetic moment where he talks how he saved one of his employees from crushing debt, but doesn't bring up the dozens of victims who blew their life savings on the guy's bullshit scams?
It wasn't a bad movie, but certainly not the movie messiah it was hyped up to be. 3,5 stars. Sue me.
Your thoughts?