awesomeClaw said:
I know we used to own Norway and that it was a very poor country til they discovered their oil.
Seriously, letting Norway go without a fight is the single biggest mistake Sweden has ever made. Sure, it was the right thing to do, but that oil would feel good in our pockets right about now...
No wonder many Norwegians still have lingering negative feelings about you entitled Swedes, going about taking pieces of land where someone lives and going "we own this now, because there are more of us and we have guns!
But honestly, the Swedish-Norwegian Union was rather lenient, it was only in the start where you really tried to "rule". The Swedish king mostly let Norwegians rule themselves and do whatever, which is why it wasn't considered a big loss when Norway became independant. About the oil, you had your chance at a part of the black gold and those in charge failed to grasp at it. Don't say you never had the oportunity!
Acrisius said:
Sweden. It was part of, and later in a Union, with Sweden. Not Denmark. Nothing good ever came out of Denmark.
Uhm, no. The period Norway was under Denmark was far longer than the time under Swedish rule. Slightly less than 300 years under the Danes, with barely over 100 under Swedish rule, and that's with all 3 periods combined. We learn a lot about this stuff in school because heck, nationalism right?!
In effect Norway was independent under Sweden, with only the King as a common denominator. All in all Swedish rule was better for Norway than Danish rule, as it is what set the wheels of independance turning. We had a constitution even before the Swedish-Norwegian Union, and Sweden allowed us to keep it, with only a few minor changes. So, thanks for starting us off on liberty, freedom and independence guys! XD
And again, thanks for cheap bacon. Thats my contribution to Sweden, I use money made in Norway to purchase your wonderful, tasty meat products.