I find this funny.ENKC said:To me as an Australian it means bogans (rednecks) putting stickers of it on their utes (trucks) and apparently having no idea of its historical meaning or context. That's right, plenty of people display this flag in Australia.
You should rename your post and question to "was the Civil War fought over slavery", since that is what this is boiling down to. So to address that question I'll say this. The civil war was fought over slavery. If you look at South Carolina's official documents declaring secession, they describe it as to protect slavery. Sure, states rights played a part, but what was the right states were fighting for? Slavery, what a coincidence. Also, the reason why slavery was declared illegal by Lincoln in the Emancipation Proclamation was because he and most people in the north believed that slavery was wrong. I won't argue whether all or even most of the people in the south were pro-slavery for racist reasons, I won't generalize as that is unfair. But most of the leadership was pro-slavery, and definitely not all of them (or even most) were pro-slavery for economic reasons.Baron Von Evil Satan said:snippity snip snip snip snip
*ahem*this isnt my name said:I am not American so dont expect much, but didnt the union have no issue with slavery until they went to war with the south and used it as an excuse ?
To me it symbolises people who disagreed with their government (iirc the southerners majority votes were ignored) and fought for what they belived in, before losing and being demonized so the government could take the moral highground...
yeah, well hicks and rednecks isnt the nicest way to put it. my grandfather is a "hick" as you say. i believe it means being prideful of southern life. which i'm not, but its nice for others to beJonluw said:Hicks and rednecks. And the dukes of Hazard.
That's all, really.
Edit: I mean no offense, of course. It's just that I've only had contact with the southern states through films and TV, and that's how they're represented...
Woah, I think your interpretation is flawed, as is your argument.Estocavio said:The efforts of Southern Americans to become Independent from what they believed to be a Tyrannical regime, for which they were branded Rebels and Traitors, and condemned by Abraham Lincoln.
It also represents how many of their people died to defend their newly Independent Lands, and the heroes who stood amongst them to be slain also.
Robert Elliot Lee for instance.
Im Australian, have no American Heritage nor relation.
My opinion is not biased.
And as for slavery coming to mind, Jefferson Davis and his Patriarchs set theirs free long before Lincoln and his wife did.
But as i once read, a man once said, the Victors write history, Glorify the Vile, and Vilify the glorious.
Since when did one man represent an entire nation? Using that logic I can assume that all Americans hate soldiers and they all believe that God intends for them to die. Slavery may be the reason the upper class rich politicians wanted to secede, but it certainly wasn't the reason most Southerners wanted to. They wanted freedom from a nation they viewed as oppressive. They see the North as taking advantage of them and stepping on them every chance it got. I explained this in my post, did you even read it? Or did you see "The South didn't represent slavery" and immediately pull out something ONE PERSON said. It doesn't even matter that he was Vice President. People have minds and they think their own ideas. An entire nation isn't going to unanimously agree with something someone says, no matter their position.Nurb said:Yes it did. It represented a nation founded on the idea blacks were ment to be slaves to whites, and plainly said slavery was the main reason for the civil war by the Confederate vice president.bl4ckh4wk64 said:The confederate flag represents the south. Contrary to belief, the south didn't represent slavery.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.268963-What-does-the-Confederate-flag-represent-to-you?page=4#10313988