TransientEntity said:
Abomination said:
I find the only requirement one needs is to embrace a contrary lifestyle for the sake of being contrary.
Proving the latter is difficult but often times the subject gives themselves away either through admission or overwhelming occurrences.
So a hipster is only a hipster if they're different on purpose, in your opinion?
No, they're different WITH the purpose of being different. Someone can be different and that doesn't make them a hipster, it's being different for the sake of being different that makes someone a hipster.
It's almost like there's two flavours of ice cream. Vanilla and poo. Everyone's taking vanilla but the hipster takes poo. Not because he likes the taste of poo but because he wants to fight the current for the sake of fighting the current. He picks poo because everyone else is picking vanilla.
He's not contrary because his tastes are different - contrary IS his taste. Contrary is the objective.
If one doesn?t meet that criteria for something then they?re not being a hipster about something.
They can, however, just be a dickhead.