Here here, I wasn't really expecting amazing things from that game but I played the demo and thought "hmm a nice Diablo-esque loot 'em up", bought the full game, got about four hours in and just couldn't play anymore, my worst buy last year.Doc Theta Sigma said:Too Human was a massive disappointment for me. I played the demo and it really had potential once you got used to the controls but once I got the full game the story was horrible, Baldur moved like a boulder attached to two other boulders and the auto-aim for the guns was horrible at choosing targets.
You seem to have a valid point there, however I have never played online or on a network, so my time stop experiences are only in single player campaigns, which made my wizard one of the most awesome characters in gaming history for me ^^Abedeus said:Time Stop was the single most retarded spell in Neverwinter Nights, vanilla one. Add-ons gave people Bigby spells and they were even more stupid.S.H.A.R.P. said:Unreal Tournament 3 really bummed me up. I have about 1250 registered hours on UT2004, which was really an awesome game. Somehow Epic just screwed UT3 up though, really a shame.
I agree.. When I finally got to about level 17 with my wizard, and discovered they left out the spell Time Stop!!!!!!!! I could just dieAbedeus said:Neverwinter Nights 2 - It's good, but not as good as the first game.![]()
Because in DnD, you can't chain link Time Stop. It's a powerful, law-breaking spell which can be cast once per few hours, even if you have more of them packed. You know how a lot of Wizard/Sorcerer duels were fought?
Time Stop -> Bigby -> Isaac's Greater Missile Storm -> Time Stop -> Isaac -> Bigby -> Time Stop -> Isaac -> Word of Power: Die. The first one to start casting won. No skill or tactic whatsoever.
Thank God you can get Disintegration only in the PRC. So you must host a server in order to duel with that spell.
BLASPHEMY!!! KILL THE UNBELIEVER!!!Specter_ said:World in Conflict:
Crappy story, too much hero-bullshit and too easy to beat.
Explain.Zombie Badger said:BLASPHEMY!!! KILL THE UNBELIEVER!!!Specter_ said:World in Conflict:
Crappy story, too much hero-bullshit and too easy to beat.
You should have misquoted Darth Vader and said "I find your lack of splitscreen disturbing."Psychosocial said:Burnout Paradise
Your lack of splitscreen disappoints me.
The game was excellent. The story was great, it was strategic, instead of the usual 'build a few hundred units from the same buildings each time and throw them at the enemy', and the multiplayer was fast and frantic (unusual in RTSs), and required players to work together and protect each other. Also, how can you not love nuking your enemies (or just napalming their troops in forests)?Specter_ said:Explain.Zombie Badger said:BLASPHEMY!!! KILL THE UNBELIEVER!!!Specter_ said:World in Conflict:
Crappy story, too much hero-bullshit and too easy to beat.