No Viet-Cong ever called him "******". He didn't "dodge" the draft, he was stripped of his world title and sent to jail. He went to jail because he thought the war was immoral. There is a reason he is known as "The Greatest".IbanezLaney said:Most people have evolved past watching idiots belting the crap out of each other and the ones who haven't know boxing is a waste of time as a fighting style because dudes like Bruce Lee coulda kicked any boxers ass before they knew what even hit em.
I don't like boxing due to the attitude/retardedness of boxers themselves.
Just watch any Mohammad Ali interview and you'll see what a tool the guy is - Incapable of a decent conversation and behaves like the aspy kids at school did. Couldnt appreciate the fame and money the American public has given him and was just a rude & arrogant traitor to them. (dodged the draft = proof he's not so tough and a coward when it came to crunch time)
This is made worse because most boxers wanna be like him so they copy him, leaving us with lots of people actually trying to be bigger idiots. Not a good result for boxing as a sport.
False.Kryzantine said:You do realize that gloves were introduced specifically so boxers couldn't kill each other in the ring, and even that doesn't stop death?xRagnarok19 said:Well boxing is punching people with gloves on while ultimate fighting is pretty much beat the crap out of the other guy.
With that in mind, more violence means more people entertained.
But like I said, I don't want this to turn into an MMA vs Boxing thread.
Because, judging by the admittedly little I've seen of UFC, all those combat styles/techniques are wasted in what basically devolves into a couple of guys grappling on the ground for the whole match.zen5887 said:I've never liked Boxing, simply because - Why watch one form of combat sport (boxing) when I can watch a whole bunch of combat sports (boxing, kickboxing, wrestling, jiu jitsu) in one.
A bare knuckle punch to the head hurts the puncher, so bare-knuckle boxers stick to the body.Kryzantine said:Fighting bare-knuckled must have hurt, though. A lot.Riobux said:I recall there being a statistic that there were no recorded deaths (or very few) in boxing before gloves were introduced. After they were, well, it rose.Kryzantine said:You do realize that gloves were introduced specifically so boxers couldn't kill each other in the ring, and even that doesn't stop death?
Burningsok said:Boxing specializes in one style of fighting. In MMA it's several, so the fighter isn't able to specialize in one thing, so he isn't as lethal as a boxer. Sure yeah the MMA has a lot more in his arsenal, but none of their tactics are more polished then a boxers ability to punch. If the boxer wasn't wearing those gloves and was wearing the MMA kind, his punches could drop any man in the MMA pretty damn quickly. I will say that an MMA fighter is very capable of taking down a boxer.
Simple remedy to a boxer only. Kick, Kick, Kick, Kick, Kick and repeat. Seriously if you only use punches you will loose. Doesn't matter if the guy is fast. One good powered kick to the stomach will the boxer really stop and think about their strategy. I am not saying that Boxers are useless. Have either of you actually gotten a full force kick of a Taekwondo style person or an Axe kick on the head? I have and it is not fun and in UFC it is all in so they will be going to do damage. If the Boxer gets in range they will have a good chance to win if their opponent is not skilled in grapple or throws or close quarter knees, elbows. While yes a Boxer is good they would have their work cut out for them even in Close Quarters.Kryzantine said:Depends on how fast both fighters are. If the boxer is allowed to get inside, he has the superior reflex and power, and I don't think even a low blow would be able to stop him at that point. The MMA fighter would go down quite quickly. And if Carl Froch came after an MMA fighter, the latter would need a baseball bat to have a remote chance at getting him down.