That's really hard to answer. It differs for everyone. That's like asking someone "When do people start entering Puberty?"Dingoman013 said:Okay, this has been killing me my WHOLE life:
Whats it like to kill a man
Graphic. But yes.ghostayami said:all i can say is that everyone in the army is my hero
and my question is, have you ever bin covered in the in the blood of one of your comrades.
PTSD is something vastly overplayed by people who just want to get home. In a job like this, you've got to expect it. But then again, some minds just can't handle it.I'm not even sure if I could, I think I turned out alright.Nouw said:That's really hard to answer. It differs for everyone. That's like asking someone "When do people start entering Puberty?"Dingoman013 said:Okay, this has been killing me my WHOLE life:
Whats it like to kill a man
My Question to you is, what are the chances of getting PTSD? Also, do you have to respect your fallen or something. Is Recoil that terrible like from games?
"The situation was caused by the most dangerous thing on any battlefield: an officer with a map."Wadders said:Thinking of going to Sandhurst Military Academy (Britain's officer training school) after I finish University so I'm a little curious about the relationships between the two. I'm aware it will possibly vary between units or whatever, but I'd still love to hear your thoughts on the matter, I've enjoyed reading this thread a lot.
http://ptsd.about.com/od/prevalence/a/MilitaryPTSD.htmNouw said:... what are the chances of getting PTSD?
Nouw said:Is Recoil that terrible like from games?
Haha I see, and what may that different world view entail?Shoqiyqa said:"The situation was caused by the most dangerous thing on any battlefield: an officer with a map."Wadders said:Thinking of going to Sandhurst Military Academy (Britain's officer training school) after I finish University so I'm a little curious about the relationships between the two. I'm aware it will possibly vary between units or whatever, but I'd still love to hear your thoughts on the matter, I've enjoyed reading this thread a lot.
If you look at Royal Marines qualifying tests, the officers have to be better at everything than the enlisted men.
However, they're still a weird lot with a rather different world view.
I must say, you are quite on top of everything. I'm impressed.Shoqiyqa said:"The situation was caused by the most dangerous thing on any battlefield: an officer with a map."Wadders said:Thinking of going to Sandhurst Military Academy (Britain's officer training school) after I finish University so I'm a little curious about the relationships between the two. I'm aware it will possibly vary between units or whatever, but I'd still love to hear your thoughts on the matter, I've enjoyed reading this thread a lot.
If you look at Royal Marines qualifying tests, the officers have to be better at everything than the enlisted men.
However, they're still a weird lot with a rather different world view.
http://ptsd.about.com/od/prevalence/a/MilitaryPTSD.htmNouw said:... what are the chances of getting PTSD?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/shocking-suicide-toll-on-combat-veterans-1746475.html
Nouw said:Is Recoil that terrible like from games?That would depend on the game and the weapon and also on you. I've seen the recoil from a 12-ga shotgun knock a man over backwards because he didn't hold it right.
When you fire, the propellant burns up and generates a lot of pressure. This forces the bullet and the gun apart. Newton's third law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Launching a .22 SSS bullet down-range with 120 ft lbs of energy means you're getting an equal and opposite 120 ft lbs of energy pushing the gun up-range, plus a little bit of rocket effect as the remaining propellant burns up and the pressure in the barrel vents ou tthrough the muzzle after the bullet has gone. If you've got the rifle snug against your shoulder and a firm hold and so on, you can watch the bullet glint in the sunlight on its way to the target. With the right position, a titchy little 14-yr-old can fire 7.62x51mm and not get hurt or flipped over. If you hold the weapon away from your shoulder because you're scared of the recoil, you turn it into a battering ram. 4 grams of lead and copper going one way at 910 m/s and 5kg of rifle coming the other at 20 m/s have about the same energy ... and so has a 50kg teenager setting off backwards up the range at a respectable 200m pace of 8 m/s.
She doesn't have the butt against her shoulder.
That guy's got more muscle mass and he's standing to accomodate the recoil.
The mechanism can't overcome the law of conservation of momentum, but it can smooth things out a lot.
If you're firing a pistol, you get a significant rocket effect from leftover propellant, which is what produces the huge flame sprays from the muzzle:
This means you get more recoil relative to the energy in the bullet.
That recoil's coming in less time because you're using a shorter barrel. You also have one or two hands holding the weapon in one place rather than two hands and a shoulder holding it in three places. This means the same amount of recoil is rather more significant.
That video and this video are using the same calibre, I think.
Grip, muscle strength, stance and being ready for it have huge parts to play.
What you'll find with experience is that there are some weapons with which you can reliably hit a Figure-11 "running man" target at 25m, some with which you can reliably hit "him" in the face at that range and some with which you can reliably hit a barn from the inside. Power will have a part to play in this because the harder the thing kicks the more it'll bounce around as you're firing. However, the fit of the grip to your hand, the height of the barrel above your wrist (giving the recoil leverage against your forearm muscles), the force against time profile of the recoil, the change in tension in the trigger mechanism as the hammer is released and a lot of other things also come into play.
You won't get the lightweight, concealable sniper rifle of Half Life and Halo games, and the odds are that even a .22LR target pistol will jump upwards with each shot, no matter how good you are ...
... but that doesn't mean you can't have a fast return to a steady aim with a more powerful 9mm, even with a crappy isosceles stance:
In related videos, she fires a Glock .45, basically the same weapon with a slower, heavier, slightly more powerful round, and you can see it start to tremble because she's fighting it because she doesn't like the recoil of it.
So ... no sniping but it won't come back through your face if you do it right. They're got Dainty Blonde firing a .44Mag revolver in there too, and she misses the target with every round but she doesn't chip her teeth with it either.
Sensible weapon for you and the right technique and recoil pretty much ceases to be an issue ... but keep that "sensible weapon" thing in mind.
Varies as much as the man, truly. Some I met wanted to be officers strictly because they could give orders, others weren't satisfied with their past leadership and wanted to make it right, others are just damn great leaders.Wadders said:Haha I see, and what may that different world view entail?Shoqiyqa said:"The situation was caused by the most dangerous thing on any battlefield: an officer with a map."Wadders said:Thinking of going to Sandhurst Military Academy (Britain's officer training school) after I finish University so I'm a little curious about the relationships between the two. I'm aware it will possibly vary between units or whatever, but I'd still love to hear your thoughts on the matter, I've enjoyed reading this thread a lot.
If you look at Royal Marines qualifying tests, the officers have to be better at everything than the enlisted men.
However, they're still a weird lot with a rather different world view.
Thanks for that replyShoqiyqa said:"The situation was caused by the most dangerous thing on any battlefield: an officer with a map."Wadders said:Thinking of going to Sandhurst Military Academy (Britain's officer training school) after I finish University so I'm a little curious about the relationships between the two. I'm aware it will possibly vary between units or whatever, but I'd still love to hear your thoughts on the matter, I've enjoyed reading this thread a lot.
If you look at Royal Marines qualifying tests, the officers have to be better at everything than the enlisted men.
However, they're still a weird lot with a rather different world view.
http://ptsd.about.com/od/prevalence/a/MilitaryPTSD.htmNouw said:... what are the chances of getting PTSD?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/shocking-suicide-toll-on-combat-veterans-1746475.html
Nouw said:Is Recoil that terrible like from games?That would depend on the game and the weapon and also on you. I've seen the recoil from a 12-ga shotgun knock a man over backwards because he didn't hold it right.
When you fire, the propellant burns up and generates a lot of pressure. This forces the bullet and the gun apart. Newton's third law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Launching a .22 SSS bullet down-range with 120 ft lbs of energy means you're getting an equal and opposite 120 ft lbs of energy pushing the gun up-range, plus a little bit of rocket effect as the remaining propellant burns up and the pressure in the barrel vents ou tthrough the muzzle after the bullet has gone. If you've got the rifle snug against your shoulder and a firm hold and so on, you can watch the bullet glint in the sunlight on its way to the target. With the right position, a titchy little 14-yr-old can fire 7.62x51mm and not get hurt or flipped over. If you hold the weapon away from your shoulder because you're scared of the recoil, you turn it into a battering ram. 4 grams of lead and copper going one way at 910 m/s and 5kg of rifle coming the other at 20 m/s have about the same energy ... and so has a 50kg teenager setting off backwards up the range at a respectable 200m pace of 8 m/s.
She doesn't have the butt against her shoulder.
That guy's got more muscle mass and he's standing to accomodate the recoil.
The mechanism can't overcome the law of conservation of momentum, but it can smooth things out a lot.
If you're firing a pistol, you get a significant rocket effect from leftover propellant, which is what produces the huge flame sprays from the muzzle:
This means you get more recoil relative to the energy in the bullet.
That recoil's coming in less time because you're using a shorter barrel. You also have one or two hands holding the weapon in one place rather than two hands and a shoulder holding it in three places. This means the same amount of recoil is rather more significant.
That video and this video are using the same calibre, I think.
Grip, muscle strength, stance and being ready for it have huge parts to play.
What you'll find with experience is that there are some weapons with which you can reliably hit a Figure-11 "running man" target at 25m, some with which you can reliably hit "him" in the face at that range and some with which you can reliably hit a barn from the inside. Power will have a part to play in this because the harder the thing kicks the more it'll bounce around as you're firing. However, the fit of the grip to your hand, the height of the barrel above your wrist (giving the recoil leverage against your forearm muscles), the force against time profile of the recoil, the change in tension in the trigger mechanism as the hammer is released and a lot of other things also come into play.
You won't get the lightweight, concealable sniper rifle of Half Life and Halo games, and the odds are that even a .22LR target pistol will jump upwards with each shot, no matter how good you are ...
... but that doesn't mean you can't have a fast return to a steady aim with a more powerful 9mm, even with a crappy isosceles stance:
In related videos, she fires a Glock .45, basically the same weapon with a slower, heavier, slightly more powerful round, and you can see it start to tremble because she's fighting it because she doesn't like the recoil of it.
So ... no sniping but it won't come back through your face if you do it right. They're got Dainty Blonde firing a .44Mag revolver in there too, and she misses the target with every round but she doesn't chip her teeth with it either.
Sensible weapon for you and the right technique and recoil pretty much ceases to be an issue ... but keep that "sensible weapon" thing in mind.
I see. I knew that they don't spray wildly but wondering whether recoil was that terrible. So you bury the dead or..? So PTSD isn't that common of an issuetheycallmemang said:Graphic. But yes.ghostayami said:all i can say is that everyone in the army is my hero
and my question is, have you ever bin covered in the in the blood of one of your comrades.
PTSD is something vastly overplayed by people who just want to get home. In a job like this, you've got to expect it. But then again, some minds just can't handle it.I'm not even sure if I could, I think I turned out alright.Nouw said:That's really hard to answer. It differs for everyone. That's like asking someone "When do people start entering Puberty?"Dingoman013 said:Okay, this has been killing me my WHOLE life:
Whats it like to kill a man
My Question to you is, what are the chances of getting PTSD? Also, do you have to respect your fallen or something. Is Recoil that terrible like from games?
I'm not sure what you mean by the second question, but I think you mean do we have ceremonies for the dead. Yes, we do.
Recoil isn't an issue in most weapons. The M4 can be fired off of your crotch. Not even kidding. We don't fire wild like in video games, we make measured shots. Every shot counts, never waste.
I can actually answer that. Most services tend to have 6 to 12 month long deployments.RouxBelle said:this is slightly unrelated to what others are asking but i figured you might be able to help me: my bf is considering going into the Air Force after grad school. now i know it's different and such, but, for any sections of the military is it easy for couples to communicate and stay together?
Hey, how ya doing? Been in for almost 8 years myself (MP), good to see a post like this, that was a good idea. Have you done any time with the 1st cav out of Bliss? Just a tip though, don't post your picture with your detailed job description, friend. I know you're proud and you should be, but you never know who's reading. OPSEC is your friend.theycallmemang said:I've been in the US Army for almost two years now, long loved the Escapist forums but never really posted much. I was curious, Escapists, if you were curious about what it's like to be in the armed forces.
MY JOB: (initiate obnoxious Medal of Honor trumpet wail) I am a 19 Delta, otherwise knows as a Cavalry Scout. Yes, we still get the wear the hats you see in Civil War movies, they're called Cavalry Stetsons. No, we don't wear them to battle... as awesome as that would be...
I go in front of the main element of whatever kind of force I roll with in simple HumVees, somewhat rickety Bradly tanks, or the surprisingly comfortable Stryker assault platforms. All of which are fun for me, because I'm the gunner. I either rock the M2 .50 cal machine gun or the mind-blowing penis-expanding Mk 19 automatic grenade launcher. I observe enemy movement, then either move in and take care of the business or call some serious explosions down from heaven that you see on Youtube with creed or ACDC playing in the background. (for the record, I hate those videos)
So Escapists, what would you like to know, if anything, about a soldier's life?
thanks. y'all have all really helped. I'm not sure how serious he really is about joining the Air Force, but he keeps bringing it up so I'm pretty sure he's considering it; and I just want to be prepared for anything and everything.Tdc2182 said:I can actually answer that. Most services tend to have 6 to 12 month long deployments.RouxBelle said:this is slightly unrelated to what others are asking but i figured you might be able to help me: my bf is considering going into the Air Force after grad school. now i know it's different and such, but, for any sections of the military is it easy for couples to communicate and stay together?
The Airforce usually only gets up to about three months. Plus, because most airforce bases are the center of Military activities, they are always around a good internet connection. Air force is jokingly the most relaxed position you can get into. My brother is encouraging me to join JTAC.
You most likely would have him calling you to much, instead of not enough.
But then again, ask the Army guy. I am not expert.
Never got into it somehow. Just didn't tickle me.Persi said:What class do you play in TF2?
good point. Thanks, man.mkg said:Hey, how ya doing? Been in for almost 8 years myself (MP), good to see a post like this, that was a good idea. Have you done any time with the 1st cav out of Bliss? Just a tip though, don't post your picture with your detailed job description, friend. I know you're proud and you should be, but you never know who's reading. OPSEC is your friend.theycallmemang said:I've been in the US Army for almost two years now, long loved the Escapist forums but never really posted much. I was curious, Escapists, if you were curious about what it's like to be in the armed forces.
MY JOB: (initiate obnoxious Medal of Honor trumpet wail) I am a 19 Delta, otherwise knows as a Cavalry Scout. Yes, we still get the wear the hats you see in Civil War movies, they're called Cavalry Stetsons. No, we don't wear them to battle... as awesome as that would be...
I go in front of the main element of whatever kind of force I roll with in simple HumVees, somewhat rickety Bradly tanks, or the surprisingly comfortable Stryker assault platforms. All of which are fun for me, because I'm the gunner. I either rock the M2 .50 cal machine gun or the mind-blowing penis-expanding Mk 19 automatic grenade launcher. I observe enemy movement, then either move in and take care of the business or call some serious explosions down from heaven that you see on Youtube with creed or ACDC playing in the background. (for the record, I hate those videos)
So Escapists, what would you like to know, if anything, about a soldier's life?
I can't say that I have, but that does sound interesting.Phlakes said:Have you ever considered joining the CIA after you get the right amount of time (4 years?) in the service?
Whats your opinion on this war?theycallmemang said:I've been in the US Army for almost two years now, long loved the Escapist forums but never really posted much. I was curious, Escapists, if you were curious about what it's like to be in the armed forces.
MY JOB: (initiate obnoxious Medal of Honor trumpet wail) I am a 19 Delta, otherwise knows as a Cavalry Scout. Yes, we still get the wear the hats you see in Civil War movies, they're called Cavalry Stetsons. No, we don't wear them to battle... as awesome as that would be...
I go in front of the main element of whatever kind of force I roll with in simple HumVees, somewhat rickety Bradly tanks, or the surprisingly comfortable Stryker assault platforms. All of which are fun for me, because I'm the gunner. I either rock the M2 .50 cal machine gun or the mind-blowing penis-expanding Mk 19 automatic grenade launcher. I observe enemy movement, then either move in and take care of the business or call some serious explosions down from heaven that you see on Youtube with creed or ACDC playing in the background. (for the record, I hate those videos)
So Escapists, what would you like to know, if anything, about a soldier's life?