What if drugs were legalised?

Recommended Videos

Glamorgan

Seer of Light
Aug 16, 2009
3,124
0
0
viranimus said:
Depends on the drug really.

Pot would result in nothing would get done

Speed ... all kinds of things would get done, but it wasnt what that person was supposed to be doing

painkillers would result in a laziness that would avoid anything stressful enough to possibly cause pain

Anti-depressants would result in several deaths due to a misinterpreted zombie apocalypse

Xtacy would result in the statue of liberty being repainted in blacklight responsive neon
Acid...

Heroine would result in the population dying out due to lack of reproduction simply because of the belief that the smack is better than sex.

Coke/Crack would result in complete economic collapse and starvation because well there would be no money left for anything but crack.

Acid.. well I yield to the man on this one...
?Today a young man on acid realised that all matter is just energy condensed to a slow vabration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.? - Bill Hicks
that and also and increased viewership of childrens programing by the 18-25 year old demographic

If all drugs were legalized for recreational use, prolly the eventual extinction of the species. That or .. zombies!

In all seriousness if your looking at this from a psychological or philosophical standpoint you need to shy away from the positive examples and look at the negative examples already present in society. You would need to consider and respect that humans a lot of times tend to lack self restraint and the ability to do anything in moderation. Then look at the negative things that come from each drug, estimating that more than half of the population involved with such chemical enhancements would be generating these negative aspects and then look at the world that youve imagined under this premise.

I am a student of psychology and philosophy, so on that end I would think my logic would provide a degree of insight. However at the same time, I lost faith in humanity a long long time ago, and that might also be skewing my conclusions.

In short, it seems like it might be a good idea in theory, but the practical application of it would likely be disastrous.
Wow. I knew I liked Psychologists :D
You have a very good point here actually. Thanks for that.
 

ShwStppnActr

New member
Jun 4, 2008
18
0
0
viranimus said:
Depends on the drug really.

Pot would result in nothing would get done

Speed ... all kinds of things would get done, but it wasnt what that person was supposed to be doing

painkillers would result in a laziness that would avoid anything stressful enough to possibly cause pain

Anti-depressants would result in several deaths due to a misinterpreted zombie apocalypse

Xtacy would result in the statue of liberty being repainted in blacklight responsive neon
Acid...

Heroine would result in the population dying out due to lack of reproduction simply because of the belief that the smack is better than sex.

Coke/Crack would result in complete economic collapse and starvation because well there would be no money left for anything but crack.

Acid.. well I yield to the man on this one...


In short, it seems like it might be a good idea in theory, but the practical application of it would likely be disastrous.
It's an extremely cynical perspective you have on the world. It seems that your whole "apocalypse" premise is based around the idea that everyone in the world would start doing all these drugs because they are suddenly legal. We have to look back to unoleian's input on this and realize that people do drugs not because of their legality, but because of their own will. And while I am not sure where unoleian stands on this issue, he does bring up a good point.

What needs to happen is the legalization of these drugs. Not all at once, but eventually, yes. Simultaneously, we need to boost drug education in schools. And I'm not talking about "Say no to drug, kids." I'm saying, actually teaching children the harmful effects of these drugs.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
I think that a lot of people would be high, all the time. This will reduce the population, which is probably a good thing. Also, it's thier right. However, it will never happen, because the government would be inable to tax it very well because so many people could find it from individuals, or even make it themselves. this is especially true of marijuana.
 

MrNickster

New member
Apr 23, 2010
390
0
0
Whole bunch of stoned people go out in public, some get a little violent. Mix that with a heightened pain threshold and you have a problem.

And a lot of overdoses.
 

Glamorgan

Seer of Light
Aug 16, 2009
3,124
0
0
ShwStppnActr said:
What needs to happen is the legalization of these drugs. Not all at once, but eventually, yes. Simultaneously, we need to boost drug education in schools. And I'm not talking about "Say no to drug, kids." I'm saying, actually teaching children the harmful effects of these drugs.
I agree. schitzo much As long as the amount people had access to was limited, and they were aware of the risks, I think that at least some of the drugs should be legalized.
 

Glamorgan

Seer of Light
Aug 16, 2009
3,124
0
0
MrNickster said:
Whole bunch of stoned people go out in public, some get a little violent. Mix that with a heightened pain threshold and you have a problem.

And a lot of overdoses.
The same could have been said about Alcohol, or Cigarettes. True, the risk is there, but the risk is also there around alcohol, guns, and a good deal of other things.
 

TheLiham

New member
Apr 15, 2010
477
0
0
deadman91 said:
Well Amsterdam is still running alright so I guess it'd work out in most countries.

America'd be fucked though. That many guns floating around and a lot of people tripping on whatever, recipe for hilarity.
Failing to see the downside here
 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
MrNickster said:
Whole bunch of stoned people go out in public, some get a little violent. Mix that with a heightened pain threshold and you have a problem.

And a lot of overdoses.
Assuming that everyone would go out and do drugs just because they can. I honestly think that the people who aren't doing them now would not do them if they where legal.
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,683
0
0
TheLiham said:
Failing to see the downside here
I think he's suggesting that people would go on shooting sprees while their judgment was impaired. In spite of the fact that alcohol is legal in the U.S. and involved in a large percentage of violent crime.
 

MagicMouse

New member
Dec 31, 2009
815
0
0
There are really no downsides.

People just don't want to think that their Government condones such actions.

Old fashioned views are preventing real progress in society.
 

HereForFreeFood

New member
Nov 17, 2009
149
0
0
Less would get done if marijuana was legalized and crack or meth being legalized would just be horrible. I say instead of working to gain more drugs, lets try to get rid of smoking and alcohol!, But that will never happen and neither will the legalization of Marijuana, Crack and Meth, so lets just all forget about it.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
ShwStppnActr said:
It's an extremely cynical perspective you have on the world. It seems that your whole "apocalypse" premise is based around the idea that everyone in the world would start doing all these drugs because they are suddenly legal. We have to look back to unoleian's input on this and realize that people do drugs not because of their legality, but because of their own will. And while I am not sure where unoleian stands on this issue, he does bring up a good point.

What needs to happen is the legalization of these drugs. Not all at once, but eventually, yes. Simultaneously, we need to boost drug education in schools. And I'm not talking about "Say no to drug, kids." I'm saying, actually teaching children the harmful effects of these drugs.
Well I did also go ahead and say that I AM cynical, and that may be influencing my conclusions.

At the same time, I work in the medical field via EMS and I have been directly exposed to the gamut of negative aspects stemming from various chemical abuses, and one of the most prevalent themes ive seen first hand is that one bad example can contaminate those in proximity to them. Junkies (IE: epitome of negative impacts) are rarely isolated incidents, they are more like cockroaches in the fact that if you see one, you know there's likely a lot more nearby that you dont see.


I fully respect that the ones who would gravitate toward the negative end of the spectrum are not the rule, nor are the ones who would gravitate toward the positive. I think its illogical to conclude any sort of percentage of good vs evil in a scenario where we have never really seen a large scale example of all drugs are legalized. I base my assumption on what has been shown and that is mankind's propensity toward self destructive behavior. Un-tether from the leash of legality a species who frequently exhibits varied levels of self destructive behavior from the extreme junkies and self mutilators to the mundane guy/girl who stays in an unhealthy relationship and give freedom to access something that has been shown to escalate self destructive behavior and you will see more negatives than positives.


Look, dont get me wrong, I personally do like the notion of a world where drugs are legal. This is likely me being cynical and jaded, and possibly even just a little bit evil but I do like the concept of complete freedom as long as it does not infringe on the rights of freedom of others. Fact is, there will always be people who dont know when to quit and take things too far. Perhaps it is better to allow those people to take it too far and in effect remove themselves from the equation. As I believe it was Hicks who said "Its time to thin the herd, If someone wants to go off and OD on drugs, let em.. I really dont think were loosing the cure for cancer"

But here is the crux. I respect that not everyone is just going to rush to do drugs just because its legal. You can argue the ring of Gyges all you like and it well might be true, but the question you have to ask yourself is if youve got one guy who is determined to blow himself up with a hand grenade, How do you give him a hand grenade in a crowded room and not expect collateral damage? Now dependent on if you want to look nationally with 300 million or globally with 6 billion how do you hand out grenades to the 10-20% who actually want to do this and again not expect collateral damage?

I know my conclusion does come off cynical, but I'm just sayin.

In any uncharted waters like this your best chance at a life preserver is to hope for the best but prepare for the worst.

Anyway.. again its just my Jaded opinion. I feel it is important to express it simply because most the thread seems to be more in favor of it. Knowing me and how much I like to play devils advocate had the threads response been reversed, the perspective I would present would likely have been reversed as well.
 

Dorian6

New member
Apr 3, 2009
711
0
0
Could you have asked a more vague question?

Are you referring to any one drug in particular?

Just the harmless drugs like marijuana? Or the dangerous stuff too (meth, cocaine, etc)?

And if the latter, what sort of Orwellian dystopia are we living in? And wouldn't there then be larger issues to worry about?
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
ShwStppnActr said:
If drugs were legalized:
1. The government would start making money off of the taxes for it.
2. The FDA would start having standards for the drugs therefore making them safer.
3. The illegal market of it would decrease because you can get it LEGALLY and probably cheaper and refer back to number 2.

So. Crime decreases, recession decreases, addicts still get what they want while helping everyone else out.
Drug related crimes decreases, Fucking insane crimes increase.

Just thinking about the deaths by car accidents of drunks gives me the shakes. Imagine the fucking crackheads and heroin addicts roaming around.
 

MrNickster

New member
Apr 23, 2010
390
0
0
Eldarion said:
MrNickster said:
Whole bunch of stoned people go out in public, some get a little violent. Mix that with a heightened pain threshold and you have a problem.

And a lot of overdoses.
Assuming that everyone would go out and do drugs just because they can. I honestly think that the people who aren't doing them now would not do them if they where legal.
I'm more talking about the always-have-dones than the suckered in new ones. With their habit now legal and nothing stopping them from being stoned in public, their new found sense of invincibility may get to their head and they MIGHT try to get dangerous.