mythicdawn12 said:
Bruin said:
From what I understand, this article is based off of a theory, based off of the ideal conditions for global catastrophe.
And the projected date it will all happen is too convient for it not to be a far-fetched and not very likely event.
It doesn't look all that likely to me. I'm not worried about it.
God I hope so. But NASA seems to be concerned. I'm not sure, are they credible?
http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/world-news/2010/06/08/nasa-issue-warning/will-solar-storm-cause-blackouts-on-earth.html
It's NASA's job to be concerned.
They're issuing a warning. And I'm not saying it can't physically happen, only that there's a very high likelihood that it won't. But that's not NASA's job. NASA's job isn't to say "This isn't a threat", because it is a threat. Near Earth asteroids are a threat. Comets we can't even see coming are a threat. Certainly solar storms are a threat as well.
But it's not one I'm worried about. It's as much of a threat as a 13 year old boy who finds daddy's pistol after listening to Nirvana. It's somebody with the ability to destroy another person. But what are the odds of that actually happening?
And this:
?Space weather forecasting is still in its infancy, but we?re making rapid progress,"
Let me rephrase what I said earlier: A theory based on ideal conditions for global catastrophe based on science that's in its infancy.