Defense said:
Gladion said:
Fanboyism disguised at its worst, ladies and gentlemen. 10 points for effort, though.
OT: The world would have another series of (better) JRPGs to play. No loss, I'd say. Maybe Koudelka would've been more popular and I'd be playing
Shadow Hearts 13 right now. Wishful thinking...
How is that fanboyism?
Fairly simple, let me get out my dictionary:
"I was never into FF and it's far too late to try, anyways. I don't care, it doesn't look interesting enough for me".
Your answer: "I don't want to see that you meant you're not interested, let me just assume you're talking about how the story is far too developed for you to understand at this point. Don't be fooled by the numbers. It's more or less a secret, but the Final Fantasy games arenot direct sequels to each other. Try them out and you will be able to enjoy life as I do. Then we fight together on the internet, the way I do right now!"
"FF games are seriously not developing. They're all the same"
This time, I don't even have to translate your answer. The very first word is enough:
"lolno"
Besides that, the most popular ones (7 - 9, possibly 10) are, on the gameplay level, very VERY alike. No comparison to Nintendo sequels, even if you tried that.
The story is also very similar, but that's just because every single major FF game is. (Possible exception: FF Tactics)
Chibz said:
Now be fair, Final Fantasy USED to be good. It's just not so good anymore.
I remember enjoying FF 4 and 6. That was a long time ago, though and I still say: It wouldn't have been a loss. Now, the SaGa games...