What if you could erase one aspect of mankind?

Recommended Videos

Malgorath

New member
Jul 13, 2010
155
0
0
werewolfsfury said:
Sorry but I don't think that that is how it would work at all. death doesn't claim only the stupid or sickly it goes for anyone at anytime you could be the smartest person in the world but be hit by a runaway cart one day and die slowly with no one caring to help you. also dna doesn't work that way
Well, I never said it would be perfect, but the smarter and stronger ones would have a better chance to survive in the fact they they would (hopefully) avoid stupid actions, or would be strong enough to live through them. And if the more intelligent and strong people, without genetic diseases, bred more than others, then the children would be more likely to be stronger and smarter and not have genetic diseases.
EDIT: And I didn't exactly mean not wanting anyone to live. I mean, it's just that doctor's try to save everyone they can, even people who need help because they did something they should have known not to.
 

Rule Britannia

New member
Apr 20, 2011
883
0
0
Sexually transmitted diseases, once they're all gone they''re gone (correct me if I'm wrong)

If I'm wrong about that then I guess I would erase eye sight defficienies (it really sucks having poor eyesight and I can't begin to imagine the impairment blind people have to endure)
 

SD-Fiend

Member
Legacy
Nov 24, 2009
2,075
0
1
Country
United States
Malgorath said:
werewolfsfury said:
Sorry but I don't think that that is how it would work at all. death doesn't claim only the stupid or sickly it goes for anyone at anytime you could be the smartest person in the world but be hit by a runaway cart one day and die slowly with no one caring to help you. also dna doesn't work that way
Well, I never said it would be perfect, but the smarter and stronger ones would have a better chance to survive in the fact they they would (hopefully) avoid stupid actions, or would be strong enough to live through them. And if the more intelligent and strong people, without genetic diseases, bred more than others, then the children would be more likely to be stronger and smarter and not have genetic diseases.
EDIT: And I didn't exactly mean not wanting anyone to live. I mean, it's just that doctor's try to save everyone they can, even people who need help because they did something they should have known not to.
DNA still doesn't work that way.Just because someone with good trait's has kids it doesn't mean that bad traits won't pop up. also have you seen Idiocracy? it'd probably end up like that
 

Lancer873

New member
Oct 10, 2009
520
0
0
The feeling that we're inherently better than all other species of life on Earth. No, that doesn't mean I want us to stop eating meat or testing on animals. I just want us to stop acting like the human race is the only damn thing that matters and we can wipe out entire species if it doesn't cause a dent in our well-being as a whole.

That's really it. Everything else is unfortunately crucial to our expanding, beautiful, and effed up race.
 

legendp

New member
Jul 9, 2010
311
0
0
NOTHING.
(Not that anyone will read this but I will explain)
If you erase emotions like greed, anger and worry then human race would never drive itself forward and furthermore you would essentially be removing FREE WILL. if you erase Disease and mortality then that in theory sounds great but that would mean that the already increasing population would go up even more wich would lead to more starvation and more wars for land and food.
Now in theory you may be able to remove enough things to fix starvation, lets say humans no longer require food to sustain ourselves (maybe humans could be powered on the universe, dark matter, I don't really know), or the need to go to the bathroom, but that might potentially open up even more problems. the world is not black and white and you cannot fix it by removing things you do not like or agree with.
 

axlryder

victim of VR
Jul 29, 2011
1,862
0
0
Dan Steele said:
Falthron said:
Dan Steele said:
Falthron said:
Dan Steele said:
Race barriers and religion

Science flew us to the moon, religion flew us into buildings

racism because its a poison that keeps us from uniting as a whole.

I know, thats 2. I'll just flip a coin on it
Did you just generalize all religious people as terrorists.
Yes, but not the suicide bombers the media has popularized. I view religious people as terrorists to themselves. Think about it, most religions teach there brainwashed followers they are fallen sinners that are unworthy of love and affection and are only redeemed through pledging allegiance to the prophet of there religion, while the religions that don't do that make you waste your life away with pointless prayer. In the end it still wastes your life.

We need to do away with beliefs that make you feel guilty for being human, that is the real terrorism.
How long has it been since you've been to a religious service? First off your generalizing all religion to be Abrahamic, animist and many polytheists don't have a specific prophet(usually) and don't necessarily pray all that much.
Secondly, why do you completely forget the other parts of religion other than devotion, like help the poor, meek, etc. in the Christian faith, or how Islam united separate clans into a sprawling empire that promoted intellectual discovery and trade in the Classical per'iod (using Abrahamic because I know about these more.) "Wasting life with pointless prayer..... WE'RE VIDEO GAMERS we waste our time and life too in pursuit of entertainment or the next level. Your making assumption and generalizations about a group that you are no part of! The only religious people you wish to see are the outspoken crazy one! What about organizations like the Red Cross, or Christian Church groups who organize charities to give to various countries in need? Is that terrorism? Many Christian Churches I've been to are merely congregation points for believers to spread the word, learn about what the(primarily new testament) scripture and help the needy, you know like what Jesus preached. It's not terrorism to themselves, especially when many times a religious experience can drive them to become a better person as a whole. I know it's predominantly Christian oriented, but that is what I know.


You know I don't hate atheist, at least not by default, but that is really hard to do on this site when many atheists here also have some weird Vendetta against religon. I ask you to respect my beliefs(whether or not you think I'm "Brainwashed" doesn't matter), and I'll respect yours).


Now on to the real topic, removing an aspect of Mankind is a tricky subject, your bound to want to remove something that may have some unintended consequences and make the end result not quite human any more, so with that in mind I would like to remove the lapses in common sense people tend to have. I know many of us probably had an error in judgement in the past that they would like to take back, I don't think much humanity would disappear if we had fewer Darwin Awards.
Its alot to answer at once but I will try my best.

1.) It has been a good 5 years since I attended a church sermon and 3 years since I renounced my baptism.
2.) while not everyone is as devoted as I mistakenly generalized most to be, there still are the ones I run into who have not even read the book they are basing there lives on and still use it to bash homosexuals or other religions along with a few races.
3.) The other parts of a religion may say help the poor, meek, etc, but that is most of the times only for spreading there message of there religion. Much like "We helped you, so you owe us by joining our faith"
4.) While religions like Islam and Christianity might have spearheaded humanity a bit, imagine how far science and learning could have gone forward if there was no dark ages or sharia law promising death to anyone who tries to disprove there belief.
5.) What I meant by wasting your life, is wasting your life with something you don't want to do. If you enjoy playing video games I would not say you are wasting your life playing them.
6.) I may not be a part of it now, but I was a part of it once.
7.) If you think the red cross is christian then you would be surprised to find that it is actually very secularist or mixed religion, I suggest reading this

http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/12/the-salvation-army-ringing-anti-gay-bells-this-holiday-season/

While I do commend religious charities on there great anti poverty work, I will not commend intolerance and bigotry by running the "But were a charity, we can do or say whatever we want because we help people" slogan. The are plenty of secularist charities too. Only you don't hear about them much because the religious media tries to blot them out of the spotlight

8.) While Jesus may have preached peace and that's assuming he existed in the first place. His message has become so contorted and convoluted it has became a hollow shell of what it once was.

9.) Anyone could become a better person if they were told that they would be tortured for the rest of eternity for not believing.

10.) I will respect your beliefs as soon as the religious right wing stops trying to pass laws and regulations based on there beliefs. I don't mind if you keep your beliefs to yourself and I will follow suit if such a thing happens, but until then I must bring up a famous quote: "Religion is like a penis, its okay to have one and its okay to be proud of it, but don't wave it around in public and don't try to stick it down my kid's throat."

I do not have any hatred for religious people, but I do have a hatred for stupid things done in the name of religion. I am not an atheist, I'm what you would identify as agnostic. With all of that aside though, I believe the human race can fare better without racism, which is what the coin landed on.
if there's any real question in your mind as to whether or not Jesus "actually existed", you should know there's hardly any doubt in historian's minds that the man was a real person (the "Son of God/miracle worker" bit is where it gets highly debatable). Also, to not respect the beliefs of someone based on the actions of another person who supposedly represents those beliefs is simply childish. If I were to meet a famous agnostic philosopher, and he made a complete ass of himself, I wouldn't think it gave me justification to suddenly disrespect your views based on his behavior. If you don't want to respect religion, at least do it based on the fundamentals of the religion itself.

As to the question, hard to say. Generally, selfishness seems to be the root of most problems. Though it's also necessary for survival, individuality, etc. So in that regard, I'd have rashness at its various levels in non-life or death situations. I see the rash implementation of scientific advances without fully (or even partially) understanding the potential ramifications of said implementation as being, possibly, humanities biggest problem at the moment. If possibly, I'd like to retroactively implement this one, making its effects on humanity stronger as humanities influence on the environment around it grows.

Anyone saying a specific social construct (imo) likely just has a personal vendetta of sorts, as those constructs are little more than scapegoats for a series of problems inherent within humanity that would likely just manifest elsewhere.
 

axlryder

victim of VR
Jul 29, 2011
1,862
0
0
TheSaw said:
Can I erase gravity?
Because I think that would be quite a funny sight while it lasted.
all life on the earth would likely be destroyed very quickly. With the earth no longer bound to the sun, the momentum it currently has would thrust it out into the depths space. The atmosphere would simply disperse. we'd go flying off in all directions. Point is, it wouldn't last very long.
 

Nyaliva

euclideanInsomniac
Sep 9, 2010
317
0
21
Erase whatever force it is that drives people to sit so strongly on an opinion that they throw all reasoning to the wayside. The kinds of people that just don't listen and don't want to listen, regardless of whether they're right or wrong. What is that, ego? Obsession? The inherent need to be a dick? Well it's not quite that but I'd probably get rid of that too. Reduce the suicide rate of teenagers due to bullying phenomenally.
 

tchyeah

New member
Jan 16, 2011
15
0
0
I would get rid of the thought that we (humanity) owns the earth, and instead believe much like what the Aboriginals believe, that we are just living on the land and its our duty to protect and preserve it. No skyscrapers or cars, just us and the wilderness (with a much lower population).
 

Talshere

New member
Jan 27, 2010
1,063
0
0
TheSniperFan said:
Talshere said:
TheSniperFan said:
Talshere said:
Even most conservative estimates believe that we will have stable fusion in the next 100 year. I expect it within my lifetime.
Still too late... :(

Not really. Even if we take the assumption that all the icecaps DO melt, and thats a BIG if, we are looking at 1000+ years for them to go.
What do icecaps have to do with oil? o_O
There are different opinions/calculations about how long we have oil left. But none of them is much above 100 years. The biggest problem is that in countries like china more and more citizen have cars and on the other hand new oil reserves are found. However, it won't be 1000 years or anything among these lines.
Another thing is that life will drastically change before we run out of oil completely. Fuel for your private car is a small factor, but transports of food and medicine....medicine-production and the plastic-industry will run into problems.
Oh right ok. Yeah thats still not a problem. The value for the quantity of reserve oil in the north sea has been like 50 years for the past 50 years. All of these estimates are given at current consumption and current extraction. Thing is while consumption is going up, extraction is going up exponentially. In the 50's it was estimated that only %50 of a reserve or some such could actually be extracted from a well. Today that value is more like 70% or 80% and every year extraction techniques are improving.

This is ignoring the development of new traditional oil reservoirs such as the Falklands as well as novel reservoirs such as shale deposits. In addition to these source development into gas hydrate extraction continues, which, if successful and I cant think why it wouldn't be, will provide us with at least, bottom end estimate, 400 years of natural gas.

This is of course all assuming we dont have a breakthrough in something like solar panels, a technology which at present is both horrifically expensive and inefficient, making it perfectly viable.

Anyone who thinks we genuinely have no chance it woefully ill informed.
 

slippereend

New member
Jan 4, 2011
29
0
0
Trent Kama said:
Greed. We'd definitely start seeing a change in how society works.
Yeah without greed you'd have a lot less fear, anger, hunger and disease. Since the money you give greenpeace and all those companies would actually be used for the cause it stands for instead of someone's yearly bonus.. o.o
 

TheSaw

A flayed man holds no secrets.
Apr 22, 2011
281
0
21
axlryder said:
TheSaw said:
Can I erase gravity?
Because I think that would be quite a funny sight while it lasted.
all life on the earth would likely be destroyed very quickly. With the earth no longer bound to the sun, the momentum it currently has would thrust it out into the depths space. The atmosphere would simply disperse. we'd go flying off in all directions. Point is, it wouldn't last very long.
I know, that's why I said "while it lasted."
 

Gabriel O'Brien

New member
Dec 16, 2011
13
0
0
MartianWarMachine said:
If I could, I would erase myself. Or maybe turn everyone into Cybermen.

No, wait! I'd give everyone cat ears!
As adorable as my wife would look with real cat ears... this thread I presume is about taking away not giving.(drifts off into a fantasy of his cat eared wife) :)
 

Gabriel O'Brien

New member
Dec 16, 2011
13
0
0
1. intolerance/ignorance
2. greed
3. betrayal
These three for me are so close together I just can't bear to put numbers near them. But, that's my best effort so far in what mankind needs to scrap.
 

4RM3D

New member
May 10, 2011
1,738
0
0
Gabriel O said:
MartianWarMachine said:
If I could, I would erase myself. Or maybe turn everyone into Cybermen.

No, wait! I'd give everyone cat ears!
As adorable as my wife would look with real cat ears... this thread I presume is about taking away not giving.(drifts off into a fantasy of his cat eared wife) :)
There is always a loophole...

I would 'take away' the ability of mankind not to have cat ears.
 

Mau95

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2011
347
0
21
canadamus_prime said:
4RM3D said:
Erase anger? Yes, that would make things better. I would erase anger, I think.
Except that anger drives us to fight to change things that we find immoral or distasteful.

Me? I'd erase greed. No need for that, none whatsoever.
Greed allows us to stand up for ourselves if we want something, which in a lot of cases is useful. Then again, if no one was greedy, I guess everything would be shared pretty much equally. Right? Right?
 

UsefulPlayer 1

New member
Feb 22, 2008
1,776
0
0
I would take away jealous/envy.

I mean you could want what someone else has, but don't get evil and dark about it.