Pink_Pirate said:
DarkLordofDevon said:
Of course there is more than 1 type of love. Love of a family member. Love of a friend. Love of a partner.
quite true, but, as is probably obvious, im referring to romantic love in this case. In the end love is just a word and depending on the context can mean any number of things. However! i digress, the word love is not to be discussed here... but the feeling of being romantically in love or attracted to someone.
Ah, I must disagree! You are NOT discussing romantic love. You are discussing Eros-passionate love.
The adage is "Romance ends where sex begins" thus old romance tales ended with the first kiss. It is a side effect of today's society that sex and romance get clumped together. They are not the same.
Moreover, sex is merely exercise if there is no love in it. With love you can feel like you are as close to touching the soul of another person as it is possible to do. Without love, it becomes a physical act that may prove uncomfortable and unpleasant.
The moment of attraction is indeed valid for your definition. A chemical reaction to what we perceive are desirable genes to keep our race going. Yet as a k-select species (long gestation, few offspring, high investment) it is important to note that humans do far better if raised by both parents. So some of this investment must also come from the male if he wishes his genes/offspring to be successful.
And there may be more validity to "it takes a village to raise a child" than we realize. Humans are a social animal, that is, we do best in groups-especially family groups who have related DNA. Having an extended network of family or close friends to help bear the costs of raising a child (physical/mental demands) can ALSO aid in providing the offspring a better chance to do well socially and reproduce in turn. Yet in other social animals such as wolves, only the alphas generally get to reproduce. So why should the rest put up with being forced to NOT follow their "instincts" as you would have it be said? Because fewer pups means more food and a better chance of survival. Pups by the most healthy, best hunters, and most socially dominant animals will also have the best fitness.
By supporting the pack they insure the family's genes survive even if they do not directly pass on their own DNA. Yet wolves also exhibit bonding rituals in shows of affection and games. So why? What purpose is "love" here? The bonding rituals helps keep the pack together so that they will all reap the benefits of having more hunters, more baby-sitters, and be able to take down larger game.
In humans, "love" may initially be a chemical, but long-term it is a choice. We still love our kids even when they ding the car, get bad grades, color on the walls. But we may not like them very much at that point! If mere attraction held us, we would not stay on to deal with the serious duties of raising the offspring we create. But again, we are k-select not r-select, failing to care for our rare (compared to hamsters and rats) offspring would be disastrous. Thus, we have developed our intellect to make up for the lack. Sex for women is known to create a stronger bond than it does for men (generally). For men it is a sign of respect, a mental choice of commitment to to stay in a relationship past the initial blush.
(This is a wiring thing due to males producing a large number of sex-cells and having a built-in desire to share them out while females are wired to produce FAR fewer and have the greater physical burden of carrying the offspring. Thus they are very cautious about what DNA they choose as well as what male will care for her and her offspring during the more difficult stages of pregnancy. Mind you, this came about long ago when humans had more difficult things to worry about in order to survive than tax forms.)
And in the end, you can not easily separate the chemical cause from the emotional effects. Knowing how the body reacts to a cut does not keep it from hurting. Likewise, understanding that chemicals in the brain cause "love at first sight" does not lessen the impact! It is one thing to intellectually understand something but it is another to experience it. And no amount of study can take the place of that.
(lol, I ramble extra when I'm tired. But the exercise was fun.)