What is the best 'alternative' energy?

Recommended Videos

Majithicus

New member
Aug 27, 2008
22
0
0
Which is your personal favourite 'alternative' energy, like wind turbines, tidal power or nuclear and why? Are there any really good ones that no-ones heard about? Personally I like the idea of Fusion Power, but say whatever you like!
 

Debatra

Kaedanis Pyran
Sep 6, 2008
661
0
0
Put a few miles of solar panels in some place far North or South where there's six months of sunlight.

How about some windfarms in Chicago?
 

TwistedEllipses

New member
Nov 18, 2008
2,041
0
0
Different situations suit different alternative energy sources but solar is probably the most universal.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
Debatra said:
Put a few miles of solar panels in some place far North or South where there's six months of sunlight.

How about some windfarms in Chicago?
not a lot of space, you would need to put them in the lake (its possible) the buildings in the city don't have the wiring to handle the power supply and the buildings would not be able to support the weight of the fans.
-------------------------------------------------------
why not tidal power in the Gulf?
why not in the Pungent Sound? oh yea... Ted Kennedy
private companies sell everything you need to make a solar array or a wind farm, the issue is zoning
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,404
0
0
JWAN said:
why not tidal power in the Gulf?
why not in the Pungent Sound? oh yea... Ted Kennedy
private companies sell everything you need to make a solar array or a wind farm, the issue is zoning
Tidal power isn't renewable. I don't think it's a good option.
 

TheHorizon

New member
Dec 17, 2008
217
0
0
Maybe that glow energy that comes off of Super Sayans.

Or their ever growing supply of hair.
 

Dajmin

Regular Member
Jul 18, 2008
41
0
11
Hydrogen. Plenty of it around, zero emissions, could also help lower the risk of rising tides :) They just need an efficient enough method of using it.

I'm also in favour of nuclear. It gets a bad rep because when it goes wrong it really goes. But in terms of the amount of power you get for the waste, it's a winner.
 

Typhusoid

New member
Nov 20, 2008
353
0
0
Fusion, if it were input/output effective, but as it is I have to say Geothermal. It can only be used in certain places, but where it works it is cheap, safe and efficient
 

Ridergurl10

New member
Dec 25, 2008
312
0
0
I support nuclear power. It's obviously not the solution to every type of energy, but it works really well and I'm sure better ways of handling nuclear waste aren't too far in the future.
 

Shade Jackrabbit

New member
Aug 3, 2008
270
0
0
I heard that there was this idea to put these pressure-based turbines under Times Square so that when people walked over it power would be generated. Something like that sounds pretty cool.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
carnkhan4 said:
Different situations suit different alternative energy sources but solar is probably the most universal.
not really, the issue is finding a place where you can get sunlight in a city enviorment you need a building that was built to support the solar array and depending on where the location is you might only be able to get a few hours of direct sunlight a day

I would hedge my bets on wind power, its expensive but if you put them high enough you can get solid wind power, 24 hours a day 7 days a week regardless of the suns location. (Alaska, northern Russia, Scandinavia would all be better off with wind OR tidal power because they only get a few months of sun exposure.
 

Majithicus

New member
Aug 27, 2008
22
0
0
carnkhan4 said:
Different situations suit different alternative energy sources but solar is probably the most universal.
Yeah, they have had 'solar furnaces' that focus the sun (in quite hot places) through many, many mirrors on to a tiny spot where you can melt a hole in steel plate.
 

cthulhu257

New member
Jul 24, 2008
470
0
0
Typhusoid said:
Fusion, if it were input/output effective, but as it is I have to say Geothermal. It can only be used in certain places, but where it works it is cheap, safe and efficient
I agree with geothermal. I seem to recall reading somewhere that there are several geothermal power plants already in construction (can't remember where, though). Also, I once had an idea to set up lightning rods in open areas like deserts, and use the heat from the strikes to power steam turbines.
 

dangerousdave_42

New member
Sep 25, 2008
184
0
0
nuclear right now its the only truly viable alternative energy source against oil wind turbines and solar might be a more "eco friendly" option but they wont meet our energy demands fully and with modern technology nuclear energy is an extremely safe technology as well
 

Majithicus

New member
Aug 27, 2008
22
0
0
Typhusoid said:
Fusion, if it were input/output effective, but as it is I have to say Geothermal. It can only be used in certain places, but where it works it is cheap, safe and efficient
The original fusion generator produced something like 1/3 of the energy of the input. Maybe not the most efficient in the world.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
cuddly_tomato said:
JWAN said:
why not tidal power in the Gulf?
why not in the Pungent Sound? oh yea... Ted Kennedy
private companies sell everything you need to make a solar array or a wind farm, the issue is zoning
Tidal power isn't renewable. I don't think it's a good option.
how is it not renewable?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_power
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
Debatra said:
Put a few miles of solar panels in some place far North or South where there's six months of sunlight.

How about some windfarms in Chicago?
solar power is still generally inefficient, also not making any power at night so you need a way to store energy(also leads to energy loss)
Wind farms eh not bad but have you heard the noise they make? sounds like a low pressure whoosh constantly over and over, so they have to be kept away from people. also not a whole lot of energy for the space they take up.

I'm just gonna go with nuke power as best, or hydroelectric, at least untill will come up with a better way to harness sunlight.
 

Hippobatman

Resident Mario sprite
Jun 18, 2008
2,026
0
0
Well, I have great faith in a method currently in development, which harnests the energy which is generated when fresh water meets salt water. The principles behind it is quite complex, but if it proves to be economically possible to mass produce these factories, they are going to be good news for all countries who have a lot of rivers and such. The factories are buildt so that they (hopefully) won't harm the environment.


The first factory is currently being buildt in Norway (yay!) and is due in 2015.

EDIT: Here's a link [http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article2027794.ece]