To my mind, what "entitlement" means- and why many of the ways it's getting used fail- is the sense you almost cannot imagine that what you are expecting would possibly be denied. It would be such a colossal travesty of justice that it boggles the mind that you wouldn't get it.
If you think about the kind of things we use the word "entitled" to describe without hyperbole- you're entitled to a jury of your peers, you're entitled to an honest day's pay for an honest day's work, you're entitled to live your life without imminent fear of physical harm- this becomes much more clear.
"Entitled" and "entitlement" as they're often used on the Internet almost needs to just be swept from the canon, it's so misused. Almost every statement that uses the words is really a shorthand for "I've already decided that nothing you would say on this matter is of any value, so stop speaking now". It's one of those terms that often comes with a perverse set of assumptions, none of which its user feels a need to explain or define- and they should, and they should be called out if they fail to do so.
Regarding ME: I'm not exactly enamored with arguments like "artists need to be able to create what their vision leads them to without the pressures of consumer feedback", but at least they are arguments, with elements that allow reasonable people to debate the pros and cons. Calling someone "entitled" is like sucker-punching your opponent at the debate and then saying you won. It's lazy, a false victory without much by way of real meaning.
If you think about the kind of things we use the word "entitled" to describe without hyperbole- you're entitled to a jury of your peers, you're entitled to an honest day's pay for an honest day's work, you're entitled to live your life without imminent fear of physical harm- this becomes much more clear.
"Entitled" and "entitlement" as they're often used on the Internet almost needs to just be swept from the canon, it's so misused. Almost every statement that uses the words is really a shorthand for "I've already decided that nothing you would say on this matter is of any value, so stop speaking now". It's one of those terms that often comes with a perverse set of assumptions, none of which its user feels a need to explain or define- and they should, and they should be called out if they fail to do so.
Regarding ME: I'm not exactly enamored with arguments like "artists need to be able to create what their vision leads them to without the pressures of consumer feedback", but at least they are arguments, with elements that allow reasonable people to debate the pros and cons. Calling someone "entitled" is like sucker-punching your opponent at the debate and then saying you won. It's lazy, a false victory without much by way of real meaning.