Everybody needs a punching bag to rag on endlessly. Some people have a particular game system, some people have sequels, and some people have religion. That and there are quiet a few people jumping on the bandwagon of sequel hate.
What is with the hate on sequels?
- Thread starter migo
- Start date
Recommended Videos
From what I can tell, it sometimes has nothing to do with how good the new games is. Normally, the hate comes from a sequel having similarities to the game before it.
People like to complain there are a LOT of sequels that are better then the originals, like Gears of War 2, Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn, Dragon Ball Z Budokai Tenkiichi 3, Super Smash bros Melee, 1080 Avalanche, Tony Hawk's Underground 2, Kingdom Hearts 2, Oblivion, Super Paper Mario, Super Monkey Ball 2!
Fable 2/3 still hasn't improved on the first one, neither has Assassins Creed 2, neither has Bioshock 2, neither has Mass Effect 2, neither has operation flashpoint 2, neither has modern warfare 2, neither has Splinter Cell, neither has Halo, neither has gta 4 Believe me when I say that this can go on and on, their story just falls apart and gameplay is never as good, mainly because after success they will try to sell more and how do you do this.. right make it so that every fool can play.
While I can't disagree with that, what does it have to do with the quality of the single player game?parasyteFMA said:
Because, USUALLY sequels are just a way to cash in and make money without improving on anything in particular whether we're talking movies or games.
If you get right down to the nitty gritty specifics of games, most aren't that good, they just pass mediocre, and sequels often shoot either at about the same level as their predecessors or lower (in the case of some movies, which isn't even made by the same people and is just an attempt to get some money off its popularity).
If you get right down to the nitty gritty specifics of games, most aren't that good, they just pass mediocre, and sequels often shoot either at about the same level as their predecessors or lower (in the case of some movies, which isn't even made by the same people and is just an attempt to get some money off its popularity).
This COULD mean that the developer spends all of it's time with the multiplayer they think is good and a little time on a single player they don't care about. If the multiplayer is decent, fine by me. If it isn't, stop trying.moretimethansense said:
It COULD, but as I said in this case it didn't, so, why do you hate this game again?parasyteFMA said:
It just left a bad taste in my mouth. BioShock was my favorite 360 game (when it was an exclusive) and when I hear about a sequel I wasn't excited but I thought this could be something I would very much enjoy. As you can tell I didn't.moretimethansense said:
Well if you just didn't like it for some intangeble reason there isn't anything that'll change that, but far too often I see people rage at it for increadibly stupid reasons:parasyteFMA said:
It had multiplayer, BETRAYAL!
The multiplayer was bad so it sucks.
I liked the first one so I'm gonna blindly sream about how much I hate the sequel without actually playing it.
I did actually play it, but I'm gonna blindly hate it because I liked the origional.
ESCORT MISSIONS, IN MY BIOSHOCK?!
I was expecting a big twist at the end and one didn't happen so it sucks for suprising me by not surising me (I wish I was kidding)
(me again) I'm just sick of all the rabid fanboyism, the first game did have faults people!
The second game did in fact improve many aspects of the origional.
They each have flaws and they each have streanghts, why can't we discuss our preffered game without it turning in to blind hatred?
Just to clear something up, the developers working on the Single Player were not working on the multiplayer. 2K Marin worked on the Single Player, and did a fine job, I must say. Digital Extremes, the makers of the original Unreal Tournament, did the multiplayer.moretimethansense said:
Huh, that's quite interestng, I didn't actually know that, thinking back on it, it did feel a lot like Unreal Tourney, I'm kinda suprised I diodn't realise that before.mazzjammin22 said:
Am I raging? No, I'm just stating that I am not a BioShock 2 fan.moretimethansense said:
Are my reasons incredibly stupid? Depends on who you ask. It's a matter of opinion.
Am I bashing 2 without playing it? No.
Blindly hating? No. I liked the first one better. Just because "problems" were "fixed" doesn't mean I will like it more. I like the idea of a man who has no idea what he's getting into exploring a world where there is a surprise around every single corner. (Sort of off topic but I honestly think 2 should have skipped altogether and Infinite came out.. Whether the thought of that game was even in anyones mind is unknown, but it would have been nice to see a new creative world in each game.)
Am I a fanboy? BioShock isn't the only game. There are games clearly better than BioShock but I just happen to like the game a great deal.
It would be different if I said "I hate BioShock 2 because the cover art looks stupid and the 10 minutes of gameplay I've seen looks ridiculous."
I wasn't refering to you with that particular spiel, I was merely explaining my knee jerk reaction, as I said if you didn't like the game then fair enough, it's just those that blindly hate, without reason or expination, that I take issue with.parasyteFMA said:
I often see such idiocy when lurking in any given forum but the escapist is particularly prone to blind bashing, it just tends to be worded better.
You're gonna find that in any internet forum. I've noticed that here too, people actually take time with forum posts.moretimethansense said:
I know GIFT right?parasyteFMA said:
It just bugs me that so many claim that the Escapist is the last bastion of intelligence on the net then immediately turn round and act like any random git on (for example) GameFAQs after a few elocution lessons, at least the mods deal with the really blatent ones.