This came from a "Sequels that ruined the original" thread. So there ya go. I joined because I saw something stupid and felt the need to correct it.Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:Sequels can't "ruin" whatever they're based on. Even if something awesome gets a shitty sequel, it still exists in it's awesome state, unchanged and untarnished by it's shitty follow up. It just means that the first one was better. It doesn't mean that the first is somehow worsened.
That, pretty much. I don't need a reason.Vanguard_Ex said:The voices.
It seemed like an interesting community I wanted to be a part of. I wasn't wrong.