What martial art would you advise that I do?

Recommended Videos

EboMan7x

New member
Jul 20, 2009
420
0
0
The chances of being mugged in the US once in a year are roughly 1 in 256. The percentage of injuries in people who take martial arts classes is 100%. It costs roughly $1000 a year to take a martial arts class, not counting hidden fees, which are prevalent. More on this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcbe3Ao0ThU
In short, there is no actual use in learning a martial art. If, on the other hand you were thinking to learn for fun or to get fit, go right ahead. I have no opinion on what you should learn, just wanted to make sure you weren't trying to do this for a practical reason :D
 

Johnny Impact

New member
Aug 6, 2008
1,528
0
0
Want to feel like you've leveled up in real life? Find yourself a Quest Center.

http://www.questmartialarts.com/

Emphasis on practical self-defense and situational awareness. Of course, it is also great exercise. There's some meditation stuff that I don't care for, but that's a minor part of it.
 

A.A.K

New member
Mar 7, 2009
970
0
0
Prepare for the Wall!

Western Standing Arts.
Western Arts such as Bare Knuckle Boxing, Savate, Conventional Boxing, Kajukenbo and American Mixed Martial Arts; are directly effective.
They have little or no philosophical elements and little or no spiritual elements.
Most of them are blatantly flawed, but nevertheless effective. You'd need to KNOW the flaws in order to tear them open.

"Self Defence" Arts.
I strongly disagree with the existence of self-defence arts, but they are an option. I believe that if you need to learn these, you should be in the military/special forces, otherwise you should EARN your power. You should EARN the right to be able to do what they do. None of this "I don't want to spend the time, I just want to learn how to tear out a throat or kidney and leave it at that." No. Fuck you.
...sorry, I digress.
Systema, Krav Maga, McMap are the 3 biggest one's you'll find. They all work. Without question.
Most people get over-confident or arrogant because it's "formed by the military". So be aware of that.

Western Grappling Arts.
BJJ, Wrestling. Two biggest examples.
They excel at 1v1. They excel at ground work.
Unfortunately, most fights (in my experience) DO NOT go to ground. These arts are also pretty shit with weapons, and close to useless against multiple opponents.

Eastern Arts.

- Most, if not all, have a spiritual or philosophical element to them which - in my opponent - is a positive thing, and if it's actively being taught during class time - and you're a hardcore skeptic or a verificationist - I'd recommend you stay away.

NOTE: ALL EASTERN ARTS ARE STREET PRACTICAL. HOWEVER - it WILL take time to understand them and apply it. Some arts are easier than others, and whatever is most natural to you will factor into it's understanding as well. If you're good enough - It WILL work. Forget about what others say.

Japanese Arts.
Karate (and it's many forms), is a standing art. It's very power directed. It's very discipline oriented.
It'll work if you put in the time and the art is natural to you, but be prepared for a lot of criticism, and a lot of bruises.
Ninjitsu, for the most part a standing art. It's focus is only a lot of 'critical' strikes, hits to the biceps, shoulders, and throats. Though this NOT, and i repeat IS NOT exclusive to ninjitsu. The moment you strip away 'sport' from any Eastern Art, it becomes very violent and very brutal.
Ninjitsu also likes a lot of weapon training, and few pretty cool tricks and is a solid art.
It's hard to find, and begone of your preconceived notions of what a 'ninja' was.
Kano Jiu Jutsu: Effective. Pretty cool to know...but you've got to be really fucking good, with well developed reflexes for this to work on the street. Just do BJJ if you want something like this.

Korean Arts.
The two biggest ones are Hapkido and Taekwondo, they're almost indistinguishable from each other. Hapkido just features more locks and shit.
"The art of the fist and foot", is more or less "the art of the foot". It's practical so long as you're:
1. Fast.
2. Have good peripheral vision.
3. Don't wear skinny jeans.

Chinese Arts.
External.
External Arts are things like the Shaolin Boxing, Long Fist, Praying Mantis, etc.
It's very hard. Very powerful.
Don't get caught up in the forms, and so long as you're not doing it as a 'sport', the pretentious arty crap is dependant on context. Don't flourish your hands and squat down into a long stance before a fight.
Though mid-fight, the flourishing of hands and the transition into stance could quite well fuck someone up.
Internal.
Internal Arts are things like Tai Ji, Wudang, and all that.
These work, and are the most brutal, angry and vicious art I've seen practiced to date.
You'll face 2 major problems though if you wish to pursue this -
1. Yourself.
2. Finding a good teacher.
You'll be discouraged by the time it takes to get good at these arts, you'll be discouraged by people mocking you or the art. I promise you, if you go through it, it'll work.
My students have all said the peaceful chinese monks are the biggest trolls to grace the earth.
There's 3 main forms of Tai Ji, Chen, Yang, Wu. Wu is violent. Pick Wu. The issue with Wu however is it's only taught in the context of fighting other Wu practitioners. Just experiment a little bit with 'current' fighters or styles, and you'll realize the shit works.

The South East Asia Arts,
Muay Thai + Silat + FMA
Muay Thai is a bastardized sporting version of Muay Boran, which features grappling and a lot of broken bones.
Muay Thai however, still works. It works very very well. If you want basic stand up survival, do Muay Thai for like, 3-6 months.
Silat, I have little experience in, but I'm don't they're vicious grapplers and knife fighters.
Same with FMA, greatest knife fighters in the world, and you pick up amazing speed. They're arrogant as a ************ though.

That's the gist. An overview. So if I've missed out your art or I've missed out information like Wing Chun, THIS IS AN OVERVIEW. Relax.

Hope this helped!




...by the way, guess what I practice/teach ;)

QUICK EDIT: Do what's natural for you. Do what you enjoy. It'll always be more effective, and you'll want to be there. If Boxing was natural, and Muay Thai wasn't, you'll always be better at Boxing. Regardless of the technical deficiencies present.
 

Vausch

New member
Dec 7, 2009
1,476
0
0
I've studied 4 martial arts so far and I can tell you this much:

Karate is great if you can find a sensei that teaches old Okinawan methods and doesn't belong to a McDojo. If you see them do a strike and lock their arm, don't train under them.
The strikes are powerful, the moves varied and straight forward (very little dynamic movements, all about straight up strikes and taking out the opponent as quick as possible). Plus you can get to learn some interest weapons; Katana, bo, jo, nunchaku, kusarigama, and more.

Taekwondo: I don't like it. Too many rules and it's hardly a self-defence art any more. It has the ability to be, but it's too bogged down with rules and regulation. Plus a lot of the sports techniques are slightly different from the defence real-life techniques by just enough to cause some confusion in your muscle memory. That's a big problem in a real world fight. Try Tang Soo Do, it's Taekwondo minus the sports aspect.

Muay Thai: Brutal. The strikes utilise much more power than many others because they tend to use more force behind them, and they're one of the few arts that use the shin and elbow as a frequent weapon.

Aikido: Really a fun one. It's good for self defence and the joint locks and throws are something to really marvel at. When you see a demonstration and it looks like someone is throwing themselves, that's only because they know how to take the fall. Otherwise, that person is getting broken.

Many places will let you go there for a month or so for free to find out if you like them. Try out the ones that pique your interest.
 

Jfswift

Hmm.. what's this button do?
Nov 2, 2009
2,396
0
41
I would recommend grappling/ wrestling in addition to other disciplines mentioned.
 

BoredAussieGamer

New member
Aug 7, 2011
289
0
0
My honest advice:

Don't take up Martial arts for self defence. When fists start flying in a real fight, every technique, every form, every single theory vanishes.

Boxing is good for fitness and self defence, because in real fights, knowing how to through a straight up punch helps.

Think of it this way: Any "martial arts" or fighting style that's treated as a sport is generally better as a self defence system.

Learning how to leg it is also good self defence.
 

A.A.K

New member
Mar 7, 2009
970
0
0
BoredAussieGamer said:
My honest advice:

Don't take up Martial arts for self defence. When fists start flying in a real fight, every technique, every form, every single theory vanishes.

Boxing is good for fitness and self defence, because in real fights, knowing how to through a straight up punch helps.

Think of it this way: Any "martial arts" or fighting style that's treated as a sport is generally better as a self defence system.

Learning how to leg it is also good self defence.
Your first point - I disagree with wholeheartedly. If that's the case, whatever you're doing - you're doing it wrong.
If people panic, or if you're not used to having punch thrown at you, then yes. You will forget your shit, but then you haven't been trained properly, or you haven't done it properly.

Second point, you can learn a straight punch from ANY style (or just about any style.) Conventional boxers also have a habit of breaking their fists in a real fight because they're so used to the gloves.

Third point, look at Wushu. Sporting wushu is damn near useless in a real fight unless you know and understand every little thing you do.

Captcha: Respect Me.