It's Atlus. Too low profile for them.
What there HAS been a lot of, however, is lots of Willful Ignorance, for whatever reason.
By which I mean people insisting that it's "________ with sex/tits" or "misogynist" in spite the fact that most reviewers have said the complete opposite.
In a game about a temptress leading a man astray, just what the hell WOULD those marketing doctorates use to give it a face for the public to know what it's about? I really wanna know how these whiners would have marketed Catherine.
Moreover, for a bunch of people who want new IPs and different ideas for gaming, we sure are close-minded when we call it "________ with tits" and leave it at that, aren't we?
Is it that because games are "art" now people need to be "ambassadors" of "moralistic" gaming to put on a face for the public? Or are all those people really that short-sighted that they don't know to play the fucking game (no, not just a demo, and this applies to every game) before forming your opinion?
What there HAS been a lot of, however, is lots of Willful Ignorance, for whatever reason.
By which I mean people insisting that it's "________ with sex/tits" or "misogynist" in spite the fact that most reviewers have said the complete opposite.
In a game about a temptress leading a man astray, just what the hell WOULD those marketing doctorates use to give it a face for the public to know what it's about? I really wanna know how these whiners would have marketed Catherine.
Moreover, for a bunch of people who want new IPs and different ideas for gaming, we sure are close-minded when we call it "________ with tits" and leave it at that, aren't we?
Is it that because games are "art" now people need to be "ambassadors" of "moralistic" gaming to put on a face for the public? Or are all those people really that short-sighted that they don't know to play the fucking game (no, not just a demo, and this applies to every game) before forming your opinion?