When you point out a small point of contention in someone's arguement, and the person who was talking, doesn't even acknowledge you said anything.
Funny thing is, I am german, and live in germany. you dont have many chances to feel anything towards jews here, for a reason you dont find them here often. my russian boyfriend has a rather low opinion of them, but i cant argue about that, cause of lack of experiance...Ieyke said:Well, I guess that IS where the stereotyping actually does stop with him. He's a super studious engineering student. His personality reminds me of Cee-Lo Green.krazykidd said:I hope you friend ends up where black males "stereotipically" end up . Shot or in jail . I'm not racist but...
Poor krazykidd, gettin' all pissy about people making observations about reality. That makes just as much sense as getting mad at someone for saying "I'm no meteorologist, but the weather sure feels humid today.", or "I'm no librarian, but that encyclopedia sure has an awful lot of pages."
*shrug*
Gods forbid people be allowed to make observational statements without some sort of judgement attached to those statements...
Getting mad about that makes as much sense someone saying to me that white people can't dance, or gamers love Halo.
I can't dance. I hate Halo. Should I be offended by one of those? No. A lot of white people can't dance, and a lot of gamers like Halo...
I'm not sure how either of these statements or any analogous statement is supposed to offended me.
Maybe if it was something more extreme than liking chicken or not being able to dance. Something that sounds like an accusation..."I'm not racist, but Germans sure seem to hate Jews." (FTR, I'm half German, and that's a bunch of nonsense.)
THAT I could understand being upset by.
That's almost like character assassination by association, and is provocative enough to make people overlook that it doesn't say "All Germans" or even "Most Germans", because it's tied to a huge historical event where Germans and Jews...uh....yea. Bad stuff.
So far as I know, there wasn't ever an epidemic of black people descending on the world's fried chicken like a plague of locusts to set the precedent that a love of chicken should be assumed as a universal trait, and so I can't see people assuming an entire race would all automatically love the same thing...because that's not how people work....
Likewise, I think it's pretty absurd to believe that anyone believes "white people can't dance" or "gamers love Halo" would be universally true traits, because there hasn't been any sort of overwhelming, seemingly exceptionless indicator that something that outlandish might be true.
.
People get offended by the silliest stuff...
Am I the only one who thinks that "You're not the only one..." doesn't literally mean "You're not the only one..." and is actually a way to say that just because nobody is the only one, I still don't have to agree with the idea?dvd_72 said:Am I the only one who thinks that "am I the only one..." doesn't litterally mean "am I the only one...?" and is actually a way to put an idea out there in an effort to find people who feel as you do?
Because really guys, not everything people say is to be taken literally.
I allow this one if the profession is relevant to the point being made.TizzytheTormentor said:I also agree on the whole "As a *insert profession here*" Thing...
Exactly. It's like the use of the word "literally" for emphasis rather than to mean something should be taken exactly at face value. It's not "destroying English" or any other twaddle people come up with. Languages evolve. Word meanings drift. This is all OK!dvd_72 said:Am I the only one who thinks that "am I the only one..." doesn't litterally mean "am I the only one...?" and is actually a way to put an idea out there in an effort to find people who feel as you do?
Because really guys, not everything people say is to be taken literally.
I agree. I've never understood why people get so worked up about questions starting with, "Am I the only one...," and it saddens me that so many then take that to shouting the person down with , "You're not a special snowflake!" I dunno, maybe being a teenager is different now than it was ten years ago, but it's sort of upsetting.dvd_72 said:Am I the only one who thinks that "am I the only one..." doesn't litterally mean "am I the only one...?" and is actually a way to put an idea out there in an effort to find people who feel as you do?
Because really guys, not everything people say is to be taken literally.
You make a good point, until you realise that more often than not the responses of "You're not the only one..." are usually followed by a generally angry post about the person "not being a unique snowflake" or "You're NEVER THE ONLY ONE" while calling them self-entitle pretentious or whatever else hasn't come to mind. It's less the wording of the response I'm fed up with, and more the hate those responses are infused with.Vegosiux said:Am I the only one who thinks that "You're not the only one..." doesn't literally mean "You're not the only one..." and is actually a way to say that just because nobody is the only one, I still don't have to agree with the idea?dvd_72 said:Am I the only one who thinks that "am I the only one..." doesn't litterally mean "am I the only one...?" and is actually a way to put an idea out there in an effort to find people who feel as you do?
Because really guys, not everything people say is to be taken literally.
Also, yes, that old phrase "want to have your cake and eat it", that just irritates me. I mean, eating is what a cake is for!
Oh, agreed there completely, it's not usually the words themselves that put me off a discussion but the attitude behind them, some people are simply difficult to discuss things with, no doubt. Hell, I'm sometimes difficult to discuss things with ^^dvd_72 said:You make a good point, until you realise that more often than not the responses of "You're not the only one..." are usually followed by a generally angry post about the person "not being a unique snowflake" or "You're NEVER THE ONLY ONE" while calling them self-entitle pretentious or whatever else hasn't come to mind. It's less the wording of the response I'm fed up with, and more the hate those responses are infused with.Vegosiux said:Am I the only one who thinks that "You're not the only one..." doesn't literally mean "You're not the only one..." and is actually a way to say that just because nobody is the only one, I still don't have to agree with the idea?dvd_72 said:Am I the only one who thinks that "am I the only one..." doesn't litterally mean "am I the only one...?" and is actually a way to put an idea out there in an effort to find people who feel as you do?
Because really guys, not everything people say is to be taken literally.
Also, yes, that old phrase "want to have your cake and eat it", that just irritates me. I mean, eating is what a cake is for!