What should Treyarch do to innovate in Black Ops 2

Recommended Videos

2733

New member
Sep 13, 2010
371
0
0
now I only played the single player of black ops and a few nights of the multiplayer so I don't know much about it but I would like to see the killstreaks thing go right out the window, the idea of giving the best players the biggest guns only serves to raise the barrier of entry on a already noob unfriendly game. more heath would also serve to eliminate the "hide and seek" style gameplay.

a better written single player would be nice too, the well assembled gameplay always seemed like it was wasted on the stories the game told.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
MetallicaRulez0 said:
I think it'd be very innovative if Treyarch launched their entire headquarters into the Sun.

Black Ops 2 will not be as good as any entry in the MW series. That's obvious. Treyarch has shown a complete lack of understanding when it comes to building a solid game engine. See: bad hit detection in every title they've ever made.

Incoming BlOps fanboys saying "hit detection is fine, L2P".
Assuming you only play multiplayer? Single player Treyarch makes much better games than IW, been that way since MW1. They should just stick to single player.

And the hit detection is fine. Its stayed pretty damn consistent over the last 5 years of being mediocre. I don't know why BLOPs gets such a hard time over it considering its about as bad as MW2's.
 

Right Hook

New member
May 29, 2011
947
0
0
krazykidd said:
Shotgun Guy said:
krazykidd said:
How about an american civil war. No russians , no terrorists , just America vs America . Just an idea.
The guns back then are SO awful, it would be hard to make a fun, well paced game with them but you are thinking a bit outside of the box and I like that.
It doesn't need to be THE american civil war , just A american civil war . Maybe a futuristic civile war caused by the american government censoring the internet . Hows that for a video game plot .
Ah, I see. I don't dislike the idea, I'd be interested in a game like that but I don't see a studio wanting to publish that game, it would just piss way too many people off.
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
dogstile said:
And the hit detection is fine. Its stayed pretty damn consistent over the last 5 years of being mediocre. I don't know why BLOPs gets such a hard time over it considering its about as bad as MW2's.
Trust me, go play MW2 and then play Black Ops. The shitty hit detection is VERY noticeable. Not only that, but there's hit lag as well. In CoD4 and MW2, if your on a decent host bullets register instantly. In Black Ops, there's a 100-200ms delay on hit detection regardless of host connection. That's why Treyarch's games feel so shitty compared to IW's games.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
MetallicaRulez0 said:
dogstile said:
And the hit detection is fine. Its stayed pretty damn consistent over the last 5 years of being mediocre. I don't know why BLOPs gets such a hard time over it considering its about as bad as MW2's.
Trust me, go play MW2 and then play Black Ops. The shitty hit detection is VERY noticeable. Not only that, but there's hit lag as well. In CoD4 and MW2, if your on a decent host bullets register instantly. In Black Ops, there's a 100-200ms delay on hit detection regardless of host connection. That's why Treyarch's games feel so shitty compared to IW's games.
Done. Maybe its just my playstyle, but it really doesn't feel that noticeable to me.
 

Darkwhite

New member
Nov 15, 2010
113
0
0
TheKasp said:
Jakub324 said:
It's not that far fetched, actually. Russia has over a million troops, and an ultranationalist version would probably push that up by another 500,000 or so. Assume the Russians hit the Americans with, say, 950,000 in MW2. That means they'd have 550,000 left to take a Europe that no longer had nearly as many troops as would be necessary. And let's not forget about the troops Makarov could've committed. He must have had a few thousand willing to do what regular soldiers would not.
OT: I'd like to see customisable facepaint and gun camouflage. I'm talking about saying 'Yeah, I like the pattern you get with Berlin camo, but what if I change the colours to, say, red and black?' (which I swear they promised in Black Ops).
It's not only farfetched, it's impossible to invade all of Europe in one hit. Britain has ~100k soldiers, Germany 200k, switzerland 170k, France 340k. Even if we assume that Russia somehow splits their army reasonable according to the countries they are invading, they are still far too small to making it more than a weak attempt defeated after their first strike. After that, with the help of the USA, Russia would be crushed from all sides.

This plot only works if all of Europe is run by monkeys.
We're in trouble then...