JimB said:
Ultratwinkie said:
Look at the plot synopses. Look how different it is from the cartoon.
Ultratwinkie, forgive me if this sounds curt, but I've said this a couple of times now and you don't seem to get the point, so:
I know the cartoon's story differs from the comics'. I have said that, and you have said that. You are repeating something I already know. It is not the question I'm asking. I am asking why you keep bringing it up. The cartoon and the comics were not trying to tell the same stories, any more than Stephen King and Robert Browning were trying to tell the same stories, even though the latter inspired the former immensely. So I will ask you again:
are you saying the cartoon is obligated to be a literal transcription of the comics?
Ultratwinkie said:
And who is whining about ruining continuity? Look at the thread!
That is not about continuity. It is about comparison. There is a Raven now that no one likes compared to the previous versions they're aware of (and I like to think they wouldn't like her even without a point of comparison, but never mind).
Ultratwinkie said:
Deathstroke has no reason to be there.
Deathstroke
isn't there.
Slade is there. A guy who may or may not have one eye and who has zero explicitly listed powers I am aware of is there. They are not the same character.
Ultratwinkie said:
Let's face it, people got fed a watered down kiddy version of a much more complex story and took that story as the real version.
First of all, bullshit. Consumption is an entirely voluntary process. No one was forced to watch the show, so you don't get to phrase it like DC crammed it down anyone's throat. All anyone had to do was change the channel to not see it.
Second,
there is no real story. It's all imaginary. One is based on the other, but they are not the same damned things.
Third, please don't think I haven't noticed that I asked you for proof of the claims you've made about who was thinking what at which times and you refused to provide any, instead just repeating the same stuff over and over.
The cartoon is only obligated to make at least a half effort into keeping the basic lore mostly intact if its drawing from the comics. DCAU raised the bar for that. Censors have stuck their noses into every decision ever, but only the Teen Titans let it get that far. In fact, it was said they didn't even know if Brother Blood would get the green light just like Deathstroke. A lot of the Teen Titan wiki makes reference to censorship.
The story they had to draw inspiration from won awards. If they had to cut out the super majority to get it onto TV, then they might as well not bother. All of the award winning arcs and events either didn't happen or got nerfed down to the point of irrelevance.
And that's the issue. There is no motivation for anything. Just generic labels for meaningless and interchangeable villains.
There is nothing in Death Stroke's arc that says "that's deathstroke."
There is nothing in Brother Blood's arc that says "that's brother blood."
Even the DCAU managed to keep some semblance of that. DCAU managed to keep motivations and some semblance of identity even if it was tenous. In teen Titans, they are interchangeable because their motivations were so generic.
Replace deathstroke with Gizmo. Or Dr. Light. Or cheetah. Or even the Joker. All of them work. The character that plays the antagonist is interchangeable and therefore worthless.
Deathstroke had a reason, because they killed his son and destroyed his life. No other villain can claim that. If someone made a kids show about Star Wars and Called Darth Vader "Anikin," didn't change his costume, and wasn't related to Luke nor was in a relationship to Padme than he is a generic villain only there because he is iconic. Then turn back around and said he wasn't the same as Darth vader and was totally an Ok thing to do.
Just like 300 heroes wasn't a rip off of multiple IPs because they changed the name. Its obvious.
And there is a real story. Just like there is a canon star wars. Raven was not some hero defying her dad. Her dad lied to her about letting her rule earth so she had to screw daddy over first so she could live.
There is a reason the JLA rejected her, because they knew she was in it for herself. And she had a reason for wanting to wage war against them. She was in it for herself and manipulated a team of idiots into doing what she wanted. That was the original, complex Raven. From this point of reference, the Teen Titan cartoon is watered down, naive, and simplistic.
Raven wasn't a likeable character because she wasn't meant to be. No kid would watch a morally gray storyline, so they dumbed it down to the point they shouldn't have even bothered.
If you had to dumb down everything, its a meaningless story with meaningless characters.