What two game characters would you like to see battle it out 1v1

[Alpha Centauri]

Basement cat vs. Celling cat

Spoiler

 

[Nouw]

All the Chaos Commanders in Dawn Of War

METAL BOXES!

SINDRI!

 

[Shoggoth2588]

Deadpool vs Kratos!

Two unkillable titans: The God of War vs The Unkillable Merc with a Mouth!! I'm sure Kratos would rip off Deadpool's jaw but, that's about all I'm sure of happening

 

[.Mudkipz.]

Call of duty vs halo?

If that makes any sence

The fight would be over in about 3 seconds.

Not always if halo.. and call of duty was player operated.. then call of duty may win.. if its computer generated. it would be over in less than 2 seconds

 

[Ldude893]

Soap Mactavish vs. Gordon Freeman

 

[recoverytwo]

Call of duty vs halo?

If that makes any sence

The fight would be over in about 3 seconds.

Not always if halo.. and call of duty was player operated.. then call of duty may win.. if its computer generated. it would be over in less than 2 seconds

Are we talking Halo rules or Call of Duty rules ? i thought it was operating on a technical level where they would take the correct damage depending on what gun is being used. if it works like that the Call of Duty guns probably couldn't even scratch the Halo people and teh Call of Duty people would probably die with one shot from almost any weapon.

 

[Valiant The Gamer]

Master Chief vs Ramirez(RAMIREZ, TAKE OUT THAT POWER ARMORED SPACE MARINE!)
or
Master Chief vs Marcus Fenix(AKA Power armored space marine fight).

 

[.Mudkipz.]

Call of duty vs halo?

If that makes any sence

The fight would be over in about 3 seconds.

Not always if halo.. and call of duty was player operated.. then call of duty may win.. if its computer generated. it would be over in less than 2 seconds

Are we talking Halo rules or Call of Duty rules ? i thought it was operating on a technical level where they would take the correct damage depending on what gun is being used. if it works like that the Call of Duty guns probably couldn't even scratch the Halo people and teh Call of Duty people would probably die with one shot from almost any weapon.

Im saying halo is better and if it was player vs. player it would all depend on how good u play the game if u have an epic.. COD player and a noob Halo player the battle outcome may be different..

Take for example



Halo takes shot.. misses by mile
Call of duty.. shotgun to chest while running...
Halo moves to follow him
Call of duty. keeps shooting
Halo. on half health runs away to find health
Call of duty shoots DEAD

Out come COD wins

Im not saying COD is good i personally like halo but if it was player vs player

The outcome can change

But if computers were running it then halo would win because COD wouldnt make that much of a hit..

Hope that makes sence

 

[recoverytwo]

Call of duty vs halo?

If that makes any sence

The fight would be over in about 3 seconds.

Not always if halo.. and call of duty was player operated.. then call of duty may win.. if its computer generated. it would be over in less than 2 seconds

Are we talking Halo rules or Call of Duty rules ? i thought it was operating on a technical level where they would take the correct damage depending on what gun is being used. if it works like that the Call of Duty guns probably couldn't even scratch the Halo people and teh Call of Duty people would probably die with one shot from almost any weapon.

Im saying halo is better and if it was player vs. player it would all depend on how good u play the game if u have an epic.. COD player and a noob Halo player the battle outcome may be different..

Take for example



Halo takes shot.. misses by mile
Call of duty.. shotgun to chest while running...
Halo moves to follow him
Call of duty. keeps shooting
Halo. on half health runs away to find health
Call of duty shoots DEAD

Out come COD wins

Im not saying COD is good i personally like halo but if it was player vs player

The outcome can change

But if computers were running it then halo would win because COD wouldnt make that much of a hit..

Hope that makes sence

but if it was a non noob there would probably be a different outcome.

 

[CloakedOne]

Darth Vader VS Master Chief.
Just so everybody will know that Darth Vader would win.

Damn straight, no contest.

 

[TheTaco007]

Call of duty vs halo?

If that makes any sence

The fight would be over in about 3 seconds.

Not always if halo.. and call of duty was player operated.. then call of duty may win.. if its computer generated. it would be over in less than 2 seconds

Are we talking Halo rules or Call of Duty rules ? i thought it was operating on a technical level where they would take the correct damage depending on what gun is being used. if it works like that the Call of Duty guns probably couldn't even scratch the Halo people and teh Call of Duty people would probably die with one shot from almost any weapon.

Im saying halo is better and if it was player vs. player it would all depend on how good u play the game if u have an epic.. COD player and a noob Halo player the battle outcome may be different..

Take for example



Halo takes shot.. misses by mile
Call of duty.. shotgun to chest while running...
Halo moves to follow him
Call of duty. keeps shooting
Halo. on half health runs away to find health
Call of duty shoots DEAD

Out come COD wins

Im not saying COD is good i personally like halo but if it was player vs player

The outcome can change

But if computers were running it then halo would win because COD wouldnt make that much of a hit..

Hope that makes sence

A spartan would kick a multiplayer CoD character's ass any day. CoD guys duy in three shots, while spartans have fucking shields and take forever to kill.
Battle rifle vs. M16
CoD guy shoots spartan with 4 bursts to the chest, does nothing but take out his shields.
Spartan shoots CoD guy in the leg, and he dies in one burst.

 

[Firehopper]

Sonic vs. Spyro

Or Jack vs. Ratchet

 

[recoverytwo]

Darth Vader VS Master Chief.
Just so everybody will know that Darth Vader would win.

Damn straight, no contest.

FINALY! Some one who understands that the force could kill him in a 4 seconds.

 

[.Mudkipz.]

Call of duty vs halo?

If that makes any sence

The fight would be over in about 3 seconds.

Not always if halo.. and call of duty was player operated.. then call of duty may win.. if its computer generated. it would be over in less than 2 seconds

Are we talking Halo rules or Call of Duty rules ? i thought it was operating on a technical level where they would take the correct damage depending on what gun is being used. if it works like that the Call of Duty guns probably couldn't even scratch the Halo people and teh Call of Duty people would probably die with one shot from almost any weapon.

Im saying halo is better and if it was player vs. player it would all depend on how good u play the game if u have an epic.. COD player and a noob Halo player the battle outcome may be different..

Take for example



Halo takes shot.. misses by mile
Call of duty.. shotgun to chest while running...
Halo moves to follow him
Call of duty. keeps shooting
Halo. on half health runs away to find health
Call of duty shoots DEAD

Out come COD wins

Im not saying COD is good i personally like halo but if it was player vs player

The outcome can change

But if computers were running it then halo would win because COD wouldnt make that much of a hit..

Hope that makes sence

A spartan would kick a multiplayer CoD character's ass any day. CoD guys duy in three shots, while spartans have fucking shields and take forever to kill.
Battle rifle vs. M16
CoD guy shoots spartan with 4 bursts to the chest, does nothing but take out his shields.
Spartan shoots CoD guy in the leg, and he dies in one burst.

Ud be suprised.. if the cod player was good enough jump and run will actually kill a spartan... EVENTUALLY.. but thats if the halo player really sucks.. like cant hit him once

 

[.Mudkipz.]

Call of duty vs halo?

If that makes any sence

The fight would be over in about 3 seconds.

Not always if halo.. and call of duty was player operated.. then call of duty may win.. if its computer generated. it would be over in less than 2 seconds

Are we talking Halo rules or Call of Duty rules ? i thought it was operating on a technical level where they would take the correct damage depending on what gun is being used. if it works like that the Call of Duty guns probably couldn't even scratch the Halo people and teh Call of Duty people would probably die with one shot from almost any weapon.

Im saying halo is better and if it was player vs. player it would all depend on how good u play the game if u have an epic.. COD player and a noob Halo player the battle outcome may be different..

Take for example



Halo takes shot.. misses by mile
Call of duty.. shotgun to chest while running...
Halo moves to follow him
Call of duty. keeps shooting
Halo. on half health runs away to find health
Call of duty shoots DEAD

Out come COD wins

Im not saying COD is good i personally like halo but if it was player vs player

The outcome can change

But if computers were running it then halo would win because COD wouldnt make that much of a hit..

Hope that makes sence

but if it was a non noob there would probably be a different outcome.

Yeh if it was a good player than the spartan would kick his ass no contest. im just saying that if u really suck then u could actually beat them eventually.

 

[TheTaco007]

A spartan would kick a multiplayer CoD character's ass any day. CoD guys duy in three shots, while spartans have fucking shields and take forever to kill.
Battle rifle vs. M16
CoD guy shoots spartan with 4 bursts to the chest, does nothing but take out his shields.
Spartan shoots CoD guy in the leg, and he dies in one burst.

Ud be suprised.. if the cod player was good enough jump and run will actually kill a spartan... EVENTUALLY.. but thats if the halo player really sucks.. like cant hit him once

.... This is applicable to everything. "If one guy sucks and the other one is good, the good one will win."
No shit. That's not the point of the debate though. The point is that a spartan is superior in every way to a CoD character, therefore if we take out the variable of player skill, (which would otherwise ALWAYS determine the outcome in the same way, with the good player winning) the spartan would win.

 

[.Mudkipz.]

A spartan would kick a multiplayer CoD character's ass any day. CoD guys duy in three shots, while spartans have fucking shields and take forever to kill.
Battle rifle vs. M16
CoD guy shoots spartan with 4 bursts to the chest, does nothing but take out his shields.
Spartan shoots CoD guy in the leg, and he dies in one burst.

Ud be suprised.. if the cod player was good enough jump and run will actually kill a spartan... EVENTUALLY.. but thats if the halo player really sucks.. like cant hit him once

.... This is applicable to everything. "If one guy sucks and the other one is good, the good one will win."
No shit. That's not the point of the debate though. The point is that a spartan is superior in every way to a CoD character, therefore if we take out the variable of player skill, (which would otherwise ALWAYS determine the outcome in the same way, with the good player winning) the spartan would win.

Yes ur right that would be the outcome yes the spartan would win on this ocassion i was wrong you were right.. take out player skill and the spartan wins hands down