I've never seen it myself, but at the time Citizen Kane was a pretty revolutionary film that greatly innovated cinematography and story structure. And it's still just kind of a darling of the industry.canadamus_prime said:Really? Was Citizen Kane really that good? I don't know I've never seen it.Casual Shinji said:Actually The Last of Us reminds me more of No Country for Old Men or True Grit.It's about the gaming world's obsession with searching for the Citizen Kane equivalent of gaming, so as to finally be deemed worthy by the rest of society.canadamus_prime said:So all we want is ultra violence? Is that the joke? Also what's with the Invisible Man?
At least, that's what I got from it.
Desert Punk said:Most modern audiences dont find it that good because we have advanced beyond what made it so revolutionary. Though it is a solid story.canadamus_prime said:Really? Was Citizen Kane really that good? I don't know I've never seen it.Casual Shinji said:Actually The Last of Us reminds me more of No Country for Old Men or True Grit.It's about the gaming world's obsession with searching for the Citizen Kane equivalent of gaming, so as to finally be deemed worthy by the rest of society.canadamus_prime said:So all we want is ultra violence? Is that the joke? Also what's with the Invisible Man?
At least, that's what I got from it.
But for its time it was amazing, the reasons for which I would have to go into an essay to answer, which...I am really not up for at this time of night.![]()
But I still have to question why it's considered that benchmark that we need to meet. Putting aside the other question of why we feel the need to keep up with the film industry instead of forging our own identity.Casual Shinji said:I've never seen it myself, but at the time Citizen Kane was a pretty revolutionary film that greatly innovated cinematography and story structure. It's it's still just kind of a daring of the industry.canadamus_prime said:Really? Was Citizen Kane really that good? I don't know I've never seen it.Casual Shinji said:Actually The Last of Us reminds me more of No Country for Old Men or True Grit.It's about the gaming world's obsession with searching for the Citizen Kane equivalent of gaming, so as to finally be deemed worthy by the rest of society.canadamus_prime said:So all we want is ultra violence? Is that the joke? Also what's with the Invisible Man?
At least, that's what I got from it.
I still don't get it. Can has explanation?Desert Punk said:HAH! THat was awesome
And for those who are getting the same error as I am heres the punchline:
![]()
Love the cardboard cut out in the last frame, thats fucking perfect.
Except the video games are interactive and films are not. That's a pretty big difference. And thus I don't see why we should be using a film as a benchmark.Desert Punk said:Because Film is the media we most closely resemble, we are nothing like writing, music, or performance art.canadamus_prime said:But I still have to question why it's considered that benchmark that we need to meet. Putting aside the other question of why we feel the need to keep up with the film industry instead of forging our own identity.
And the reason it was a bench mark is because it did so many things fundamentally different to other films of it time and changed film making forever. THAT is the bench mark gaming needs, a fundamental shift in how things are done for the better that will enhance the medium as a whole.
This is why I'm on the Suit's side rather than Erin's. Emotionally engaging characters are for movies, not games.Ishal said:I laughed at this.
But I wish Videogames would stop being compared to movies. The two mediums should be going in different directions not having one trying its best to emulate the other.
Thanks, that makes slightly more sense. I don't really keep up with a large portion of popular culture (anything that isn't references to things I like or based on hats).Desert Punk said:Sure, I will repost the explanation I made earlier about it.Flames66 said:I still don't get it. Can has explanation?Desert Punk said:HAH! THat was awesome
And for those who are getting the same error as I am heres the punchline:
![]()
Love the cardboard cut out in the last frame, thats fucking perfect.
And sorry for double quotes, just wanted to make sure Flames got an inbox notification ^.^Desert Punk said:Its not an invisible man.canadamus_prime said:So all we want is ultra violence? Is that the joke? Also what's with the Invisible Man?
its a Suit. People in charge of companies that are fairly faceless and bureaucratic are called Suits, they have no personality, all about the numbers ect.
And its not really about violence, it is about the fact that people are all comparing Last of Us to Citizen Kane in its impact and depth, and in gaming things have to be turned up to 11 and marketing says people like actiony covers acording to the folk that made Bioshock Infinite.
Thus its SUPER Citizen Kane, where Kane is
over his shoulder like Dewit was holding a shotgun so the pose is more action oriented, and battlefield is a very popular cover as well so they mimicked that as well.Holding his sled rosebud
Well, crap. Text adventures just got WAY more difficult to write. Thanks.Blood Brain Barrier said:This is why I'm on the Suit's side rather than Erin's. Emotionally engaging characters are for movies, not games.Ishal said:I laughed at this.
But I wish Videogames would stop being compared to movies. The two mediums should be going in different directions not having one trying its best to emulate the other.
Because the gaming industry, for all it's billions of dollars of revenue, still has a big selfesteem problem. And also still has the image of being toy manufacturers, and providers of shallow indulgence, thus nothing to grant any serious attention.canadamus_prime said:But I still have to question why it's considered that benchmark that we need to meet. Putting aside the other question of why we feel the need to keep up with the film industry instead of forging our own identity.