What would you ban?

[willsham45]

No idea why but you just got given the power to ban one legal thing in your country, anything items, food, activities what ever you can think of. What would you ban and why?

 

[Edorf]

I'd ban assholes.

- Because they are pricks and dont contribute to society, or evolution in any positive way.

 

[sheic99]

The internet.

Also, inb4 religion.

 

[Mr.Petey]

Ban the crap out of bullies, at any stage in our lives from school to the workplace. Nothing good has ever come from one person assuming he can victimise and belittle another for their own selfish thrill

 

[Andy of Comix Inc]

I would ban the government's "stupid jerks who continue to keep the videogame R-rating away from the public who have been asking for it since 1779" department. Which would hopefully in-turn unban the R18+ rating for videogames. Eh.

 

[DJDarque]

I would ban stupid people. Yup, I said it.

 

[Dark Knifer]

Hmm, this would be a tough choice. The list of things I would consider would be arrogance, cigarretes, internet trolls, the "whatever sells" mindset of all entertainment industries... The list goes on for a while.

 

[The Austin]

4Chan. Stupid people. The Jersey Shore.

Anyone who puts the word "religion" on this thread.

 

[finlay219]

ban the bnp useless bunch of cunts

 

[Fetzenfisch]

Well i could follow the thoughts of some greek philosophers and say that the only government that is needed is one wise and good Tyrant. But that really went wrong more than several times in history So i would say i hereby ban stupidity in all its forms. (which kinda includes sheic99's post)

 

[TheHecatomb]

Smoking.

Edit: And alright, I won't say religion. But I will say "Each and every individual that chooses to display or enforce his/her religious preference outside the walls of either their homes or their churches."

 

[SimuLord]

I would ban political parties. George Washington was right.

 

[emeraldrafael]

I ban controversy.

Solves alot of the worlds problems before they arise.

 

[Prof.Wood]

Every one but me.
Then I will re-build England in my image.

 

[ActivatorX]

Hmm, this would be a tough choice. The list of things I would consider would be arrogance, cigarretes, internet trolls, the "whatever sells" mindset of all entertainment industries... The list goes on for a while.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the text in bold a contradiction on your behalf?
Isn't it arrogant to state such a thing?

 

[TheRobotandtheBeast]

Projectile and incendiary weapons of any kind. All wars shall be fought by fisticuffs or the blade.

 

[thiosk]

Public comments on news articles.

 

[TheHecatomb]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the text in bold a contradiction on your behalf?
Isn't it arrogant to state such a thing?

Let me correct you, because you're wrong.

Banning cigarettes is not more or less arrogant than banning anything else mentioned in this thread.

 

[Snork Maiden]

Public comments on news articles.

Well this is probably the best idea ever. Could we ban Youtube comments as well?

 

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

I'd ban assholes.

- Because they are pricks and dont contribute to society, or evolution in any positive way.

Evolution?...seriously?

How could you possibly know?...evolution is not a straight line.

OT: I doubt I'd ban anything. I don't like it when I'm told I can't enjoy something because someone else doesn't like it, so I won't inflict it upon anyong else.