Freaky Lou said:
All reviews are inherently subjective opinions. There's not an unbiased one that's ever been written; the job of a reviewer is to clearly convey his or her experience in a way that lets you know if you'd like it or not, highlighting positives and negatives a less discerning eye may not have noticed. A reviewer's job is NOT to be objective.
Yeah, that's fair, but some measure of objectivity is called for in that process. If a reviewer is naught but completely subjective, you don't know whether or not you would like or dislike a game, you only know whether they liked or disliked it due to their own personality and preferences. The review he linked, while not as bad as it seemed at first pass, sets out with the intention of slamming Oblivion for all the things its not. And since a lot of the critiques are on the nose, it can read like a damning indictment of the game. The reviewer does NOT give any time or attention to praising many of the things that Oblivion is, other than a few backhanded comments about it being a mediocre action game.
Ultimately people are free to write (and read) whatever kind of reviews they please, but I'm not sure I'd call such a one-sided review "honest", nor its author "a true RPG enthusiast". The author clearly likes a particular style of RPG, and is savaging Oblivion for not living up to his expectations. If I write a restaurant review column for my local paper, and I slam the new Mexican joint for not being Italian enough, I'm not doing my job.