Sougo said:
So I've just watched Avatar. Yes I know I'm a couple of months too late, but anyways...
The movie definitely did not live up to all the expectations drawn up for it by ppl who've already seen it. Sure, it wasn't a 'bad' movie, but other than the CGI, which I admit was amazing, I really found the movie to be somwhat disappointing.
1) Why is it called Avatar? On the planet of Pandora, occupied by humanoid species called the Na'vi, whose home is now under threat by humans. Seems like a more fitting name would've been "Humans vs. Thundercats" (as all the Na'vi look like distant cousins of Panthera of the thundercats).
2) In the first 15 mins it becomes pretty obvious who the good and the bad humans are, seeing as all the Na'vi are good ... you can practically predict what happens next in the movie.
3) Am I the only one who thinks the the colonel (yes, the big bad guy) was in the right?
4) The movie creates a distinct impression that the humans and Thundercats are somewhat evenly matched ... that is until the fighting actually begins ... and the humans PWN the thundercats. This really got me thinking that if the humans were all that militarily superior to the Thundercats anyway, why in the world did the colonel employ Jake Sully to find weaknesses in the tribe? You don't need weaknesses to bomb em...
5) The movie has Sigourney Weaver in it ... as a scientist! I can't believe I watched a 2.5 hour movie with Sigourney Weaver in it and there wasn't a single scene of her machine-gunning someone or hammering someone with Mecha-armor (and this movie had guns and Mecha-armor too). To make matters worse, she dies .... and she doesn't even come back, as a thundercat or as a cyborg. (You'd think that after 4 Alien movies this was a given...)
6) The colonel offers Jake Sully legs.... LEGS dammit. Who doesn't want legs!!! I can't help but feel that between LEGS and joining team thundercats .... LEGS was the right choice.
7) "The Humans were sent back to their dying world..." Really? So Jake Sully chooses to live on a lush planet teaming with life, while condemning his fellow humans to die off with their world... I dunno about you but I think this looks as bad as genocide to me...
8) The humans lost 1 battle and its all over ?!?!? Why wasn't the colonel succeeded by a 2nd in command or something? Where are the nukes, dammit?
All in all, its not that I didn't like this movie, but frankly I hate it when a movies story has too many holes in it. I suppose most of you guys will disagree with me, but I'd like to know your thoughts on the topic anyway. Note: I still think Avatar is a good movie (much better than most of the stuff coming out these days) but I could have been better.
Spoiler Alert: If you haven't seen Avatar and you've read the above, be happy. You don't need to see the movie anymore ^_^
1) It's a single catchy word, that describes how he lives his life through an avatar, and becomes it.
2) True
3) I thought the spend most time on the left side of teh screen, but i could be mistaken, and no i think he's a tard, but great comic relief, but thats just my oppinion
4) the na'vi couldn't defend themselves from aerial assault, but i guess they oculd've pwned teh human base somewhat if they attacked... but yeah, mainly for the sake of the plot i think, hough they needed to figure out how to demolish the tree.
5) It's funny how some people will complain that adam sandler (or many others) always plays the same role, but when someone plays something out of their ordinary spectre of roles, it's bad as well?
6) The na'vi gave him stronger blue legs + he got between the legs of that navi chick, if thats how they mate... i think they use their pony-tails... which in turn means they're rapeign their horses and pterodactyles when they ride them :S
7) The unobtainium wasn't gonna do shit to save earth, only make someone rich, it's a metal, not water or plants or anything.
8) They lost their force, and the planet is several years of travel away, but sure, it owuld make sense if more peopel came there.
It's nopt that i think it's the most awesome movie ever or anything (Boondock Saints is) it's just that i hate when a rant is so rushed half of teh stuff written doesn't make sense/isn't thought through... if you wanna ***** about something get some facts straightm otherwise peopel will just think you're a hater and dismiss everything you say as verbal diareah. Though i'm delightfully suprissed that you go beyond "it's dances with wolves" an argument which could tear down most movies if that was a solid groudn for calling something bad.
The thing i liek most (apart form the awesome CGI) is the whole world. In movies as well sa games, i find the setting to be as important as the story, even more than story in games, cause gameplay beats story in my book.