My two cents.
1.An Athiest does not believe in the existence of God. This is not something you are born as, I know the technicality of the term implies that we are, but Athiesm is a choice. A person who has been exposed to one or several concepts on the idea of God and has chosen to believe that a God does not exist.
My opinion: Athiests are no more moral or immoral than any other human being. They have chosen to believe that there is no God, and live life accordingly. They are people who simply have a different philosophy starting point on life than their religious counter-parts do.An Athiest must attempt to better themselves based on personal philosophy.
2.An Agnostic has not come to a clear decision on the concept of God. They believe that God could exist, but aren't entirely sure that he does.
My opinion: The Agnostic is uncertain, recognize's the value or merit in the concept of God, but cannot integrate this view, do to a lack of capacity for "faith". Again, they are no more moral or immoral than any other human being.
3. The Religious person is one who believes in a higher power, and is strongly associated with a known religious group. Buddists, Hindu, Muslims, Jews, Christians, Taoists, and various tribal religions qualify. They live their life according to the religious principles that they believe in.
My opinion: The Religious person can see the value or merit in the concept of God, and can accept this view largely due to "faith". While some religions set a standard of living which is impossible to reach, most religious people will try to better themselves by attempting to reach this standard. They may encourage others to live by the same philosophy that they have chosen. They are no more moral or immoral than any other human being.
4. The Religious Extremist is a person who has taken the ideas of a given religion and twisted them to the extreme. Hence the name. The abortion-clinic bomber's, suicide pilots, and various other violent offenders would qualify. Unlike the typical religious person, these people do not attempt to live by the standards of life that a religion has accepted. They attempt to destroy all people who do not share their skewed belief system, this usually is directed at people of another belief, or those without belief, and may include members of the orginating religion.
My opinion: These people are severely disturbed. They are some of the worst offenders possible, due to their ability to combine "faith" and serious violent action. They are in a constant state of attack torward the rest of the world, and have less morals than most other people.
5. The Anti-thiest or Extremeist Athiest is a person who is not content with not believing in a God. They are on a mission to rid the world of belief and values systems associated with religion.
My opinion: The Extremist Athiest is a destructive person, who disregards other people's values, beliefs, ideas, and philosophies. They bare striking similarities to the Religious Extremist in that they are both on a mission to destroy other people, the only significant difference between them is that the majority of Religious Extremist's often turn to violent acts, while fewer Extremist Athiests use violence, usually being content with being insulting, arrogant, and attempting to infringe on the rights of others.
The Extremist athiest does not care about the idea of God as much as they care about religion. Usually this person has experienced or witnessed a hienous or immoral act by a religious person, and has decided that ALL religious people should be condemed because of this. This person does not rationalize the situation by realizing that religious people are human, and thusly capable of immoral acts. Rather, they take extremeist views of opposition, most of the time this reaction is due to a personal experience with religion that was distasteful at best. While they are ( in general) no more moral or immoral than any other human being, they ( like their Religious Extremeist counter-part) will often make grandious claims of being more moral than their percieved enemy.
