Aren't there fixes on the net? Granted, I've only ever gone back to games from around XP's release, but I've never had one that I couldn't get working.Grouchy Imp said:I have an old 386 PC with Windows 3.11 because Microsoft hates backwards compatibility and just because a game is old doesn't make it bad. I also have an old Pentium Pro PC with Windows 95 for exactly the same reason.
Quite a lot of games from back in the day didn't have frame limiters because no-one thought they'd ever be needed - you try running some early 90's games on a modern PC and even with the help of something like DOSBox they're just uncontrollable. I tried playing Blade of Destiny (the RPG, not the Wolfenstein add on) on my new PC a while back, and just the act of walking down the high street of Thorwal took three weeks as the in-game clock just went at warp speed. Not good, especially when Blade of Destiny has an inbuilt time limit of two years.Woodsey said:Aren't there fixes on the net? Granted, I've only ever gone back to games from around XP's release, but I've never had one that I couldn't get working.Grouchy Imp said:I have an old 386 PC with Windows 3.11 because Microsoft hates backwards compatibility and just because a game is old doesn't make it bad. I also have an old Pentium Pro PC with Windows 95 for exactly the same reason.
Mind you, I doubt either of those 2 systems are particularly costly so it's probably not worth the effort.
You sound like the angry video games nerd (his website is cinemassacre.com, he reviews really old games angrily and has probably every systems invented all connected to one TV).merman said:Still have a lot of old consoles set up permanently for quick access. The oldest one in continual use is my Commodore 64, owned it since 1985 (that's 25 years!), closely followed by a NES (although I only got it a couple of years ago)
I guess that makes sense, although I'd have thought you'd be able to edit something in the config files; can't say I've ever messed around with games that old though.Grouchy Imp said:Quite a lot of games from back in the day didn't have frame limiters because no-one thought they'd ever be needed - you try running some early 90's games on a modern PC and even with the help of something like DOSBox they're just uncontrollable. I tried playing Blade of Destiny (the RPG, not the Wolfenstein add on) on my new PC a while back, and just the act of walking down the high street of Thorwal took three weeks as the in-game clock just went at warp speed. Not good, especially when Blade of Destiny has an inbuilt time limit of two years.Woodsey said:Aren't there fixes on the net? Granted, I've only ever gone back to games from around XP's release, but I've never had one that I couldn't get working.Grouchy Imp said:I have an old 386 PC with Windows 3.11 because Microsoft hates backwards compatibility and just because a game is old doesn't make it bad. I also have an old Pentium Pro PC with Windows 95 for exactly the same reason.
Mind you, I doubt either of those 2 systems are particularly costly so it's probably not worth the effort.
And no, they won't be worth much nowadays. Their value is far more sentimental than monetary.
Same here. Only those things are very hard to kill because Nintendo built them like fucking tanks.Redlin5 said:![]()
When mine inevitably dies, I will go out of my way to replace it.
Woodsey said:Quite possibly, but I'm more comfortable tinkering with hardware than software. At the end of the day I'd rather have a couple of old machines knocking about than start messing around with program files. Personal preference I suppose.Grouchy Imp said:I guess that makes sense, although I'd have thought you'd be able to edit something in the config files; can't say I've ever messed around with games that old though.Woodsey said:Quite a lot of games from back in the day didn't have frame limiters because no-one thought they'd ever be needed - you try running some early 90's games on a modern PC and even with the help of something like DOSBox they're just uncontrollable. I tried playing Blade of Destiny (the RPG, not the Wolfenstein add on) on my new PC a while back, and just the act of walking down the high street of Thorwal took three weeks as the in-game clock just went at warp speed. Not good, especially when Blade of Destiny has an inbuilt time limit of two years.Grouchy Imp said:>snipsnip<
And no, they won't be worth much nowadays. Their value is far more sentimental than monetary.