retyopy said:
Rawne1980 said:
There hasn't been a good doctor since Sylvester McCoy.
Wow... Thanks for the clarification on why the show isn't good any more.
ooookay, allow me to elaborate.
Sylvester McCoy was The Doctor in the 80's when some of us here were kids and he was our first Doctor. I'll grant you the bad guys didn't look all that great but they never really have in Doctor Who anyway. So with him being the first Doctor we saw and slapping on a pair of lovely nostalgia goggles, he's my favourite.
Now then, on to the modern.
It returned to our screens after a long absence with Christopher Eccleston stepping in as The Doctor.
Now Eccleston already has a pretty large fan base from his previous acting roles in the likes of Cracker, 28 Days Later and Gone in 60 Seconds. We already knew he was a decent actor and would probably fit the role well.
And he did, he played it a little bit nuts to keep in line with previous Doctors but didn't go too far over the top and when he did serious parts it was believable.
So he did one season and decided he didn't want to just be known as "The Doctor" so he stepped down and made way for David Tennant.
As soon as Tennant arrived you could hear girls tongues slapping on the floor all over the country including my eldest daughters. Instantly he'd done a good job because he was likeable.
Not only did he manage to pull off the less serious side of the Doctors Character he pulled off the more serious side aswell. When he made threats you could believe them. When he got into a fight you could believe it. When he started to lose control a bit towards the end of his reign it was utterly enjoyable.
When he left, no one knew who could fit the role as well as he did. He'd won the nation so to speak.
Now before I get to Matt Smith I just want to remind the people that Doctor Who was always seen as a family show that everyone gathered around on a Saturday to watch.
So up pops an unknown entity in Matt Smith.
Previously we'd been given Doctors who managed to pull off the serious and the insane and do it pretty damn well. Now were given a Doctor that looks like he's barely past puberty.
He does manage to pull off the whacky side fairly well but it's just not believable when he tries to be serious. He makes a threat and I have visions of the "bad" guys giggling wondering if they hurt him will he get his mum.
But that I can tolerate, Doctor Who has never been a serious show it's entertainment so lets suspend disbelief for a minute and look at the real reason a lot of people hate the show now.
The old head writer writer that did Eccleston and Tennants story lines quit.
In step Steven Moffat to the role of head writer. Now he'd already written for the previous 2 Doctors but this would be his first time running the show.
For a show that had been a family show up until now it went entirely the wrong way. It tried to do far too much and leave far too many twists and ask far too many questions that people eventually said "look, bollocks to it I give up". Not because they couldn't follow it (although there are people out there who couldn't and I don't blame them, most of it made no fucking sense) but because it never answered any of the questions.
So it went through bollocks after bollocks and dragged through a few more twists and turns just incase anyone managed to follow what thin plot they had and they wanted them shook loose. In the end all we were given is "who is River Song" which most of us had guessed quite a few episodes ago.
In closing, the main reason it's not as "popular" as it was before Matt Smith isn't really his fault. It's gone from an easy viewing family show to trying to turn into a psychology mind fuck with a guy who isn't the best writer who's works i've been subjected to.
Matt isn't a terrible Doctor. Yeah he's a bit young and baby faced and about as firghtning as a jelly baby but he is trying and he isn't doing a really bad job.
It's the story lines that are letting it down and turning off the families that make up the bulk of the Doctors fans.
Hope that help, sorry for my lack of input before.