I beg to differ. Since when did the death of millions solve problems? We had the 2 world wars because people's freedoms and ways of life were being threatened by expansionist powers, not because some teenagers decided they didnt quite like the way the world is.Furburt said:A nice world war would solve most problems.
0.o ...Your either a Daily Mail reader or a BNP supporter.TimbukTurnip said:The people we need to get rid of to start a nice world are the useless ones - For example, unemployed foreigners who get money from the government for doing bugger all. They're just taking up space, resources and money, and not giving anything back. Why keep them around?
Aye, We Brit's used to do that, but instead of a planet it was a country, a country called Australia.Another idea i like (though unfortunatly not do-able . . yet) is one i remember my grandmother saying several years ago - Send any criminals, worthless people, and arseholes (examples of these being people who graffiti on walls, speeders who are likely to run someone over, etc), basically worthless and dangerous people, up onto their own little planet, where they have no pre-selected to government or laws. It is their planet, and they can treat it as they want but can never leave it.
In the end they'd be living (quite literally) in their own shit that will probably have graffiti painted on it, knife and gun crime being popular hobbies.
Watch them all squirm =]
The whole point was that, EVERYONE sits around thinking they have the problem figured out, nobody does anything about it. There's a distinct line between "identifying the problem" and "griping".MBergman said:But isn't identifying the problem part of solving it?eatenbyagrue said:Honestly? If people would stop griping about "how much the world has changed" or "how bad the world is" and actually did something.
We live in the 21st century. Most of us can expect to live to at least 60, and in great comfort. Things weren't "better" 50 years ago, or 60 or however many years ago various old people will tell us. Things are awesome NOW.
Saying that we should be happy with things now because they are more awsome than yesterday isn't that like if I'm homeless and find a bigger box to live in I should be content with that since the new one is awsome in comparison?
Zing.Nickolai77 said:Aye, We Brit's used to do that, but instead of a planet it was a country, a country called Australia.![]()
I don't read the newspaper and i dont know what BNP is =]Nickolai77 said:0.o ...Your either a Daily Mail reader or a BNP supporter.
Yeah but at least it was kept cleaner than my imaginary planet. Plus it was a sort of big prison i think, whereas they people get free raom on the planet :ÞAye, We Brit's used to do that, but instead of a planet it was a country, a country called Australia.![]()
Yeah, but it would be good while it lasted. And there's always WW4 for when overpopulation starts.MBergman said:Until we reproduce back to our current population and the same circus starts all over again.
Despite the Nuclear Holocaust, yeah, that does sound like fun.Furburt said:A nice world war would solve most problems.