Having played few RPGs, I'm going to go with Diablo (for some reason have't played Diablo 2 and it's expansions), Overlord and Pokemon Ruby/Saphire.
Fallout 1 is a truly excellent game but i would much rather play Fallout 2. I prefer the sense of humour in the second and New Reno is my favourite place in any game even though it is smelly and full of hookers. That's not to say the first game isn't top rate but i fail to understand why people think the first is any better.Lordmarkus said:Since I have only played Fallout 1 and 2, I will have to say Fallout 1.
I don't know but I didn't felt that I was really sucked into Fallout 2 like I was in Fallout 1. Sure Fallout 2 got more weapons, armor and bigger world but I never felt the atmoshpere in it. Which is rather weird because Fallout 1 and 2 is almost the same game though Fallout 2 got more "candy".
I consider Fallout 1 just a prologue, an introduction to the universe. The second game is where everything became fully fleshed out. Also, the first game, although it does have its charms, suffers from massive control and UI issues which make it a chore to play. Like, there's no "Take All" button when you loot, you can't freely trade items with your gang members but they act as merchants, you can't push them out of the way if they're blocking your path, little things but they make the experience very frustrating if you've played the second part too.Lordmarkus said:Since I have only played Fallout 1 and 2, I will have to say Fallout 1.
I don't know but I didn't felt that I was really sucked into Fallout 2 like I was in Fallout 1. Sure Fallout 2 got more weapons, armor and bigger world but I never felt the atmoshpere in it. Which is rather weird because Fallout 1 and 2 is almost the same game though Fallout 2 got more "candy".