Aprilgold said:
Todd Ralph said:
The people and movement are ridiculous. The majority sound like spoiled rich kids and idiots who either never read the fine print line or insisted on living out of their means. Both of which I have absolutely no pity for.
Vicarious Vangaurd said:
A bunch of self-entitled hipsters that don't actually know what they are talking about, but are rather upset about it. The real problem is that they are occupying Wall Street when Wall Street can't fix the economy (or socioeconomic tiers that are a part of pretty much all society) any more than the protesters can.
isometry said:
The occupy movement is a sad confirmation of the dismal expectations I had for my generation. Moral subjectivity in the form of "whatever you want is true for you" and "everyone's opinion matters" is a road that leads to nothing.
Writers in past ages have analyzed the corrupting influence of wealth on government, they've described/predicted the problems we are in and outlined great solutions. The occupiers don't read these books, because they are lazy and use the excuse that all ideas are equally true / deserve equal weight to justify their laziness. Reading books is hard, it's easier to believe that ideas pulled out of their uneducated asses are just as good.
Actually, according to the AP, 71% of OWS members have jobs. Compared to the only 56% of people attending Tea Party rallies that do. Hilarious fact, actually.
Having a job and having a degree are two different things. Do they have jobs that require a college degree or does it just say that they are employed. Does it state where they are employed because quite a few of them could be "self" employed and say they have jobs through themselves and still not be making any money and be devoting their time entirely to the OWS movement.
Those are questions that popped up from just reading your statement about the AP article. I am not trying to discredit anything its just that you need to ask questions to get the whole picture and a lot of people don't and assume that hearing something is enough information rather than getting a few sides to the story. Which is why I personally haven't really made up my mind on the whole OWS movement. I have friends who go to school literally 10 blocks from Wall Street so I have been hearing about this thing from the get go. But I have also been reading about it on both sides and at first they really didn't know what they wanted to some degree because their list of demands was long and quite a few contradicted others. So that cartoon you posted in another post is actually true to a point about them not knowing what they wanted.
You can agree with it or against it just make sure you read things from both sides and not just read one side and feel like you know enough.
*EDIT* The part about having a job and having a degree being two different things means that the people of OWS might have jobs but not necessarily have a degree while people of the Tea Party might have degrees but not have jobs. It would work either way though.