What's Your Opinion of Occupy?

Recommended Videos

Krion_Vark

New member
Mar 25, 2010
1,700
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Aprilgold said:
Todd Ralph said:
The people and movement are ridiculous. The majority sound like spoiled rich kids and idiots who either never read the fine print line or insisted on living out of their means. Both of which I have absolutely no pity for.
Vicarious Vangaurd said:
A bunch of self-entitled hipsters that don't actually know what they are talking about, but are rather upset about it. The real problem is that they are occupying Wall Street when Wall Street can't fix the economy (or socioeconomic tiers that are a part of pretty much all society) any more than the protesters can.
isometry said:
The occupy movement is a sad confirmation of the dismal expectations I had for my generation. Moral subjectivity in the form of "whatever you want is true for you" and "everyone's opinion matters" is a road that leads to nothing.

Writers in past ages have analyzed the corrupting influence of wealth on government, they've described/predicted the problems we are in and outlined great solutions. The occupiers don't read these books, because they are lazy and use the excuse that all ideas are equally true / deserve equal weight to justify their laziness. Reading books is hard, it's easier to believe that ideas pulled out of their uneducated asses are just as good.
Actually, according to the AP, 71% of OWS members have jobs. Compared to the only 56% of people attending Tea Party rallies that do. Hilarious fact, actually.
Having a job and having a degree are two different things. Do they have jobs that require a college degree or does it just say that they are employed. Does it state where they are employed because quite a few of them could be "self" employed and say they have jobs through themselves and still not be making any money and be devoting their time entirely to the OWS movement.
Those are questions that popped up from just reading your statement about the AP article. I am not trying to discredit anything its just that you need to ask questions to get the whole picture and a lot of people don't and assume that hearing something is enough information rather than getting a few sides to the story. Which is why I personally haven't really made up my mind on the whole OWS movement. I have friends who go to school literally 10 blocks from Wall Street so I have been hearing about this thing from the get go. But I have also been reading about it on both sides and at first they really didn't know what they wanted to some degree because their list of demands was long and quite a few contradicted others. So that cartoon you posted in another post is actually true to a point about them not knowing what they wanted.

You can agree with it or against it just make sure you read things from both sides and not just read one side and feel like you know enough.

*EDIT* The part about having a job and having a degree being two different things means that the people of OWS might have jobs but not necessarily have a degree while people of the Tea Party might have degrees but not have jobs. It would work either way though.
 

jawakiller

New member
Jan 14, 2011
776
0
0
It's been said once but I feel I must reiterate.

Fuckin hipsters.
There, I said it. Don't hate brah. That's just how it be. While there were other types of protesters, it was mostly a bunch intitled little (pardon the language) shits wanting a bigger slice of the pie. Pretty simple. I knew a lot of douches that went up. All fucking hipsters. Not exaggerating. All were annoying as fuck and frankly, it was nice to see them gone even if it was only for a few days.

That's about it. People will try arguing with me but I'm speaking from experience. I trust my personal experiences more than word of mouth. Sorry.
 

Todd Ralph

New member
Nov 27, 2011
46
0
0
Krion vark tell me since when was flipping burgers or actual manual labor become a bad thing? You make it seem like you need a degree to succeed. Which I can tell you right off the bat is dead wrong. Neither of my parents hav e a degree and both do pretty well. I have an associates I don't even use and I'm still better off than any of those whining hipsters
 

blizzaradragon

New member
Mar 15, 2010
455
0
0
I used to at least sympathize that they were trying to change the way things were run, but now they're causing the 99% more harm than good. I know of at least a dozen people who lost their jobs because the occupiers decided to block roads in hopes of getting their voices heard, causing them to be late and fired for it. There have been more local businesses that have been affected than big businesses, with a good portion in my state either going into bankruptcy now or flat out closed down. I also know of people who have actually quit their jobs to join the protest, and consequently are now on food stamps and getting unemployment benefits which are costing the 99% they so greatly claim to help even more. They aren't helping the 99%, they're destroying it.
 

Hatchet90

New member
Nov 15, 2009
705
0
0
They're people who say, "fuck corporations" while posting on Facebook using their MacBooks, drinking Starbucks coffee, and wearing American Eagle or Hollister plaid shirts. They're complete hypocrites who don't stand for anything outside of inconveniencing people who actually have a job that doesn't come from a basket-weaving or art history degree. They are arrogant pricks who don't listen to police and are creating a disaster area in public places that are made for people to enjoy. I'm all for people protesting whatever they feel like and I agree that protesting corporate greed is probably a good cause. But creating a Hooverville in the middle of Central Park, blocking intersections and bridges, and making cops use so-called "police brutality" is certainly not the way to go about it. I'm certain that maybe 5% of the protestors stand for something, but the other 95% are just there to bandwagon and be a nuisance.
 

Evil Alpaca

New member
May 22, 2010
225
0
0
I think they are going about their reform the wrong way.

Look at the tea party groups or the Vietnam era protests. It wasn't the rallies and people on camera holding signs in front of buildings that changed public policy. It was the organization of the people to communicate their dissatisfaction to their local politicians.

I see the OWS movement doomed to failure because they are not posing a threat to the people they are protesting against. This is not to say that they should be violent, rather they should show that the rallies are representatives of a larger social outlook.

The Tea party was a similar crazy people movement until they became politically active. Congressmen began listening to them because they showed they represented voters. Until the OWS becomes a major force in politics, its going to be relegated to the sidelines as a group of silly people.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
I support many of the underlying messages of the movement. I agree that it's regrettable that sometimes the least-considered are picked out for comment, but that's the nature of a presence that has intentionally chosen not to have a figurehead. I applaud the dedication many members have shown in the face of violent repression. I'm glad that they've succeeded in getting enough attention to harness the national conversation, and I confess I prefer a scattered message to loudmouths shouting down elected officials at town hall meetings with ill-informed slogans parroted from Fox News.

Fundamentally, I believe that there is enough for all, and you shouldn't get scare-labelled a communist for suggesting we were better off when CEOs made only forty times as much as assembly-line workers.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Eh.

You hit someone and they say "OW". You hit a class and they say "OWS".

There's nothing terribly in-depth about the whole thing, it's a bunch of people saying "Stop hitting me". OWS should be saying "stop hitting us", but it's usually more like "stop hitting me, and people like me" and ignoring the rest of the 99%, same as everyone else does.
 

Kopikatsu

New member
May 27, 2010
4,924
0
0
Acrisius said:
SuperMarshmallow said:
I have to agree with the OP, I can agree with the ideas but there are people in the movement that are... ugh. That said I don't have high hopes for it, I don't have high hopes for "change" in general. As long as politicians can divide the country with partisan rhetoric, the people will never be strong enough to fight back.

I could see something possibly happening if, say, the OWS and Tea Party were to begin working together in some fashion. There is some major common ground to work from, and the fact that they don't agree on every issue would in fact solidify their stance on the ones they do concur on--a corrupt as hell government ruled by special interests and backroom deals. We must show a united front, and demonstrate to those in Washington that they can use Republican/Democrat divisions to keep us down.
First thing you need to do in that politically fucked up country is abolish the 2-party system. That shit just ain't working and it's not democratic at all. Even Britain, I've heard (correct me if I'm wrong, but also the fact that there are now 3 parties in the UK parliament seems to support this), is seriously considering to change that shit, and they've had it basically forever. It's like you say. All they do right now is practice some pretty masterful bullshit-rhetoric. Congress has nothing to do with democracy, if it ever did. Just a bunch of fat cats yelling at each other for the cameras. Correct me if I'm wrong...
No, you're right. I've always believed that the two party system is flawed (Because most of the time, you're voting for who you think will fuck things up the least, not who you think is actually best for the country). Most of the accepted practices in Congress are pretty shitty, too. Especially things like filibusters and pig fat. Actually, I never liked the entire political structure we have in the US. A complete overhaul would be nice, but it would also be extremely unconstitutional, impractical, and other assorted things.

Hatchet90 said:
They're people who say, "fuck corporations" while posting on Facebook using their MacBooks, drinking Starbucks coffee, and wearing American Eagle or Hollister plaid shirts. They're complete hypocrites who don't stand for anything outside of inconveniencing people who actually have a job that doesn't come from a basket-weaving or art history degree. They are arrogant pricks who don't listen to police and are creating a disaster area in public places that are made for people to enjoy. I'm all for people protesting whatever they feel like and I agree that protesting corporate greed is probably a good cause. But creating a Hooverville in the middle of Central Park, blocking intersections and bridges, and making cops use so-called "police brutality" is certainly not the way to go about it. I'm certain that maybe 5% of the protestors stand for something, but the other 95% are just there to bandwagon and be a nuisance.
I write off the OWS protestors because...the standard of living in the US compared to basically everywhere that isn't Europe is EXTREMELY high. There isn't much to complain about if you compare the conditions in the US to somewhere like Northern Africa, Mexico, or even China.

Yeah, yeah 'Just because it's worse somewhere else doesn't mean we can't complain'. It kind of does. Even the poorest people in the US aren't hard off. (I mean, hell, I was homeless for a few months a while back and it wasn't like life was awful.)
 

Todd Ralph

New member
Nov 27, 2011
46
0
0
Pretty much. If you have running water a roof over your head and shit live in America you are already better off than most of the world. Then again I have no sympathy for people at all. There is no reason anyone should go hungry do you have anyidea how easyit is to build a squirrel or bird snare? I lived off the land for 5 weeks in a jungle survival course off habu birds insects and birds
 

NoOne852

The Friendly Neighborhood Nobody
Sep 12, 2011
843
0
0
I don't understand why it's still happening. It lost its momentum and impact. If they want to be effective, they need to step back, gather together, and charge again. Instead, they seem to feel that sticking around there helps them, but as far as I know, they are just pissing off the locals at this point.
 

ckam

Make America Great For Who?
Oct 8, 2008
1,618
0
0
All for fighting the power, but something's giving me a bad feeling about this entire thing... Though, I do like how the police are handling this rather terribly.
 

Knusper

New member
Sep 10, 2010
1,235
0
0
I would like to say that I agree with them, but that's hard - they have no specific criteria, which is why they don't have more public support. So no, I like the movement, I just don't see it getting anywhere.
 

Gottesstrafe

New member
Oct 23, 2010
881
0
0
Honestly? It's a bunch of idealistic kids without any real goals. A grab for media attention against an incredibly generalized target. People caught up in the hype and spirit of the phenomena without any clear plans to enact change. A mess of repressed, ineffectual rage grandstanding as some sort of rebellious movement to symbolize the changing of the times. It's Woodstock without the decency of playing some good music. It's Rebel Without a Cause with all the actors in the dark on their roles.
 

xdiesp

New member
Oct 21, 2007
446
0
0
In Europe, political movements such as this are completely normal. That they scare the US is only proof of how much they're down the hole of authoritarism: why would someone protest the system, they must bad and traitors.
 

beniki

New member
May 28, 2009
745
0
0
Well... take a look at any picture. Most of the clothes they wear have designer labels, none are particularly skinny (a nice way of saying most are down right husky), all have good hair, all of their teeth, and can apparently afford to take a month off work to sit in a street and wave a piece of cardboard.

Not sure what they hope to achieve. Wealth comes from working hard, not from asking for it. This 1% stuff is kind of silly, since that 1% put in the effort to get there. Complaining about it now is pretty much the same as throwing a fit when someone pwns you on Counter Strike. Sure we could make the game easier... or you could just practice more.

I don't agree with the notion of a broken system. In my job, I see people work hard out of poverty the first world hasn't seen in decades, and then manage to make more money than I'll ever dream of. It comes at a price. There always is. Useless to complain the price is too high. Useless to be jealous of the people willing to pay.

Now doing some hard graft in whatever job you have? That's useful to everybody.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Hey I like communism/Socialism as much as the next guy but I don't really see it as a viable system and its essentially what the protests kind of boil down to. I'd like to see some changes but I don't think the protesters are going about this is a good way or present a coherent argument. Maybe if they had some sort of charismatic cult leader organizer then things would look different.