It just seems to be a dick move on thier behalf as it was already on the disc that we spent 60 quid on, and it is something that if succesful could start to pick up momentum and get worse.ohgodalex said:I did not say that you were moronic, but that the complaining is moronic in and of itself.miracleofsound said:It may be a very little snowball, but it stands atop a very steep slope.
Let's not forget the SF4 outfits either... by the way in both cases I did not spend my money on the DLC in question, so implying that I am 'moronic' seems a little counter productive to your thread's flow of discussion.
And, in both instances, Capcom is simply trying to make money. They are, as is mentioned in the Kotaku article that I linked to, a company. They know how to run a profitable business, and I fail to see how their decision to make some of their content, that people were perfectly happy without, optional and paid condemns them in any way.
I'm sorry that you took offense to the statement, though. I'm used to arguing with my friends, who come up with hypothetical arguments to try and emulate the reasoning of people that I disagree with.
What if, for example in the next Resi title you had to pay for an extra download to unlock any multiplayer options, or in SF5 you have to buy Ken seperately?
Downloads like Broken Steel and Knothole Island add a lot of new content to the games, it just seems a little more reasonable than paying to unlock stuff that should really have been included in the original game.